green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Byrd v. Delo
But see, McDonald v. Blackburn, 806 F.2d 613 , 622 n. 9 (5th Cir.1986) (following plurality in Kuhlman ), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 874 (1987); Branion v. Gramly, 855 F.2d 1256, 1260 (7th Cir.1988) (petitioner must make "colorable showing"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 1645 , 104 L.Ed.2d 160 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Government of the Virgin Islands
See United States v, Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Catherine Papajohn
See United States v. Adams, 799 F.2d 665, 670 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2464 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987) (distinguishing between “I believe that the defendant is guilty,” which is an impermissible voucher, and “I believe [that] the evidence has shown the defendant’s guilt,” which is a permitted argument).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Catherine Papajohn
See United States v. Adams, 799 F.2d 665, 670 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 (1987) (distinguishing between "I believe that the defendant is guilty," which is an impermissible voucher, and "I believe [that] the evidence has shown the defendant's guilt," which is a permitted argument).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hohe v. Casey
See plaintiffs’ brief at 15 (citing Robinson v. New Jersey, 806 F.2d 442, 446 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987) and acknowledging that the escrow “regime” established by the union is constitutional).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary A. Hohe Timothy L. Cassel Joseph F. Clover, III Vickie M. Clover Steven A. Ebersole Linda R. Garman Arlene J. Hetzel Carol D. Hench Francis D.M. Hill, Jr. Mark A. Kantorczyk Nancy Lebo Gerald J. Maher Jeri Morris Jack H. Reefer, Jr. Thompson M. Young, II v. Robert P. Casey, Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Joseph L. Zazyczny, Secretary of Administration, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania G. Davis Greene, Jr., State Treasurer, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Council 13, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees v. Leroy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Don Bailey, Auditor General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Frederick T. Marens, Executive Director, Pennsylvania Crime Commission Kenneth R. Reeher, Executive Director, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency William R. Shane, Chairman, Public Utility Commission Donald W. Bagenstose, Executive Director, State Public School Building Authority James H. McCormick Chancellor, State System of Higher Education Robert J. Bray, Jr
See plaintiffs' brief at 15 (citing Robinson v. New Jersey, 806 F.2d 442, 446 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987) and acknowledging that the escrow "regime" established by the union is constitutional). 36 Because of this concession and the plaintiffs' failure to raise on appeal a facial constitutional challenge to Act 84's escrow provisions, we need not address that issue. 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes v. Lipscher
See Robinson v. New Jersey, 806 F.2d 442, 449 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987); Frederick L. v. Thomas, 578 F.2d 513, 517 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes v. Lipscher
See Robinson v. New Jersey, 806 F.2d 442, 449 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987); Frederick L. v. Thomas, 578 F.2d 513, 517 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Catherine M. Jones v. Pittsburgh National Corporation T/d/b/a Pittsburgh National Bank, a Federally-Chartered Banking Corporation American Motors Corporation, a Delaware Business Corporation Amica Mutual Insurance Company, a Rhode Island Business Corporation American Auto Sales, Incorporated, T/d/b/a Wilkinsburg Jeep, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation Whitehall Adjusters, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation McKean Motors, Inc., a Pennsylvania Business Corporation Golick Corporation, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation Streets Run Auto Service, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation v. David A. Jones, Third Party Deft.
See United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169, 1173, n. 3 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987); Smith v. Danyo, 585 F.2d 83, 86 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Pittsburgh National Corp.
See United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169, 1173, n. 3 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987); Smith v. Danyo, 585 F.2d 83, 86 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Britton
See United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 (3d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmie Calvin Caves, United States of America v. Chloe Kathleen Gorman
See generally United States v. Adams, 799 F.2d 665, 672-73 (11th Cir.1986) (upholding conviction for possession of marijuana when female defendant’s presence in motor home containing marijuana “was essential to the success of the ruse — to give the appearance of a couple vacationing in a motor home”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2464 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Anderson Miller v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden
In reviewing whether this challenge implicates Miller’s due process rights, we consider “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (emphasis in original); see Newton v. Superior Court of California, 803 F.2d 1051, 1058-59 (9th Cir.1986) (applying Jackson standard on review of state prisoner’s habeas petition challenging sufficiency of the evidence), ce rt…
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin E. O'BOyle v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc
See Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon, 807 F.2d 1150, 1156 (3d Cir.1986), (except in a few specific situations not applicable here, a notice of appeal from a non-final order will take effect when, due to subsequent events, the previous non-final order is rendered final), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 (3rd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dannenberg v. Software Toolworks Inc.
See also Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon (New York), 807 F.2d 1150, 1155 (3d Cir.1986) (using a pragmatic approach similar to Horn and exercising jurisdiction only after concluding “that the dismissal, which was nominally without prejudice, was for our purposes a final dismissal” because the statute of limitations would prevent the plaintiffs from refiling any dismissed claims), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dannenberg v. The Software Toolworks Inc.
See also Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon (New York), 807 F.2d 1150, 1155 (3d Cir.1986) (using a pragmatic approach similar to Horn and exercising jurisdiction only after concluding "that the dismissal, which was nominally without prejudice, was for our purposes a final dismissal" because the statute of limitations would prevent the plaintiffs from refiling any dismissed claims), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Owens
See also United States v. Adams, 799 F.2d 665, 671 (11th Cir.1986) (when district court withdraws evidence from the jury with an instruction to disregard it, “ ‘the error is cured unless the evidence is so highly prejudicial as to render the error incurable’ ”) (quoting United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 916 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2464 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ahls v. Sherwood/Division of Harsco Corp.
Id. at 308-09 , 82 S.Ct. at 1514-15 , 8 L.Ed.2d at 525-26 ; see also Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon, 807 F.2d 1150, 1155-57 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2463 , 95 L.Ed.2d 872 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnie M. Owens
More than one court has recognized the sensible principle that “[a] defendant cannot take his chances with a judge and then, if he thinks that the sentence is too severe, secure a disqualification and a hearing before another judge.” Taylor v. United States, 179 F.2d 640, 642 (9th Cir.1950); see also United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 , 1173 n. 3 (3d Cir.) (“Disqualification motion filed after trial and judgment is usually considered untimely ... for otherwise a party alleging bias would always await judgment in the hopes of a favorable decision.”) (citations omitted), ce rt. de…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Consolidated Rail Corporation
v.
Erie Lackawanna Inc.
v.
Erie Lackawanna Inc.
No. 86-1612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1987.
481 U.S. 1070
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.