green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Byrd v. Delo
But see, McDonald v. Blackburn, 806 F.2d 613 , 622 n. 9 (5th Cir.1986) (following plurality in Kuhlman ), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 874 (1987); Branion v. Gramly, 855 F.2d 1256, 1260 (7th Cir.1988) (petitioner must make "colorable showing"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 1645 , 104 L.Ed.2d 160 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zia Agricultural Consulting, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
See Nicholas v. Buchanan, 806 F.2d 305, 307 (1st Cir.1986) (plaintiff's “generalized reference to inter-state contacts ‘via telephone communications' and ‘via U.S. mail,’ without more,” did not satisfy due process requirements), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1071 , 107 S.Ct. 2466 , 95 L.Ed.2d 875 (1987); Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1262 (9th Cir.1985) (“ordinarily ‘use of the mails, telephone, or other international communications simply do not qualify as purposeful activity invoking the benefits and protection of the [forum] state’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 475 U…
discussed
Cited "see"
Silver v. Brown
See Nicholas v. Buchanan, 806 F.2d 305, 307 (1st Cir.1986) (plaintiffs “generalized reference to inter-state contacts ‘via telephone communications’ and ‘via U.S. mail,’ without more,” did not satisfy due process requirements), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1071 , 107 S.Ct. 2466 , 95 L.Ed.2d 875 (1987); Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1262 (9th Cir.1985) (“ordinarily ‘use of the mails, telephone, or other international communications simply do not qualify as purposeful activity invoking the benefits and protection of the [forum] state’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 475 …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See State v. Johnson, 240 Kan. 326, 330 , 729 P.2d 1169 (1986), cert. denied 481 U.S. 1071 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Government of the Virgin Islands
See United States v, Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Franklin Beverly v. William Armontrout, Warden State of Missouri, James Franklin Beverly v. William Armontrout, Warden State of Missouri
See Thornblad v. Olson, 952 F.2d 1037, 1038 (8th Cir. 1992). 3 "The sufficiency of an information is primarily a question of state law." Wilkerson v. Wyrick, 806 F.2d 161, 164 (8th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1071 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blankenfeld v. Clarke
Accord, Wilkerson v. Wyrick, 806 F.2d 161, 164 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1071 , 107 S.Ct. 2466 , 95 L.Ed.2d 875 (1987); United States v. Becton, 751 F.2d 250, 256 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3480 , 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Catherine M. Jones v. Pittsburgh National Corporation T/d/b/a Pittsburgh National Bank, a Federally-Chartered Banking Corporation American Motors Corporation, a Delaware Business Corporation Amica Mutual Insurance Company, a Rhode Island Business Corporation American Auto Sales, Incorporated, T/d/b/a Wilkinsburg Jeep, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation Whitehall Adjusters, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation McKean Motors, Inc., a Pennsylvania Business Corporation Golick Corporation, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation Streets Run Auto Service, a Pennsylvania Business Corporation v. David A. Jones, Third Party Deft.
See United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169, 1173, n. 3 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987); Smith v. Danyo, 585 F.2d 83, 86 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Pittsburgh National Corp.
See United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169, 1173, n. 3 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987); Smith v. Danyo, 585 F.2d 83, 86 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aguilar
The Court therefore, on constitutional grounds, reversed Brown's subsequent conviction and sentence for auto theft. 9 To reach this holding, the Court applied the Blockburger test, which is a venerable "standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense." Brown, 432 U.S. at 166 n. 6, 97 S.Ct. at 2226 n. 6; see generally United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169, 1183-85 (3d Cir.1986) (Higginbotham, J., dissenting in part), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aguilar
To reach this holding, the Court applied the Blockburger test, which is a venerable “standard for determining whether successive prosecutions impermissibly involve the same offense.” Brown, 432 U.S. at 166 n. 6, 97 S.Ct. at 2226 n. 6; see generally United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169, 1183-85 (3d Cir.1986) (Higginbotham, J., dissenting in part), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 (3rd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2465 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Autoscribe Corporation v. Goldman and Steinberg, D/B/A Intell-A-Check Goldman and Steinberg, Incorporated Intell-A-Check, Incorporated
See Stuart, 772 F.2d at 1194 ; see also Nicholas v. Buchanan, 806 F.2d 305, 307 (1st Cir.1986) (interstate mail and telephone communications alone insufficient to subject defendant to personal jurisdiction of forum state in breach of contract action), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1071 (1987); Hydrokinetics, 700 F.2d at 1029 ; Scullin Steel v. National Ry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnie M. Owens
More than one court has recognized the sensible principle that “[a] defendant cannot take his chances with a judge and then, if he thinks that the sentence is too severe, secure a disqualification and a hearing before another judge.” Taylor v. United States, 179 F.2d 640, 642 (9th Cir.1950); see also United States v. Rosenberg, 806 F.2d 1169 , 1173 n. 3 (3d Cir.) (“Disqualification motion filed after trial and judgment is usually considered untimely ... for otherwise a party alleging bias would always await judgment in the hopes of a favorable decision.”) (citations omitted), ce rt. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Keds Corp. v. Renee International Trading Corp.
The “Constitutional touchstone” for determining whether the application of personal jurisdiction comports with the due process requirements of the Constitution is “whether the defendant purposely established ‘minimum contacts’ in the forum state.” Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 474 , 105 S.Ct. 2174, 2183 , 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985) (quoting International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 , 66 S.Ct. 154, 158 , 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945)); See also Nicholas v. Buchanan, 806 F.2d 305, 307 (1st Cir.1986) cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1071 , 107 S.Ct. 2466 , 95 L.Ed.2d 875 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geaneas v. Willets
The United States Supreme Court has made clear that “the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation.” Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 456 , 82 S.Ct. 501, 506 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962); see also Owen v. Wainright, 806 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., Owen v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 1071 , 107 S.Ct. 2466 , 95 L.Ed.2d 875 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
Minneapolis Electric Steel Castings
v.
Minneapolis Electric Steel Castings
No. 86-6634.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1987.
Published
Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.