green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 ·
…disclosure of sensitive materials to a adversary would undoubtedly have a chilling effect on the parties' willingness to provide the confidential information essential to the fact-finding processes.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 · 2 courts ·
…obviously, where confidential material is disclosed to an employee of a competitor, the risk of the competitor's obtaining an unfair business advantage may be substantially increased.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Diamond Ventures v. Barreto, Hector
(2×)
disclosure of sensitive materials to a adversary would undoubtedly have a chilling effect on the parties' willingness to provide the confidential information essential to the fact-finding processes.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Intel Corp. v. Via Technologies, Inc.
obviously, where confidential material is disclosed to an employee of a competitor, the risk of the competitor's obtaining an unfair business advantage may be substantially increased.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
DeJesus v. State
connelly makes it clear that such personal characteristics of the defendant are constitutionally irrelevant absent proof of coercion brought to bear on the defendant by the state
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.
obviously, where confidential material is disclosed to an employee of a competitor, the risk of the competitor's obtaining an unfair business advantage may be substantially increased.
discussed
Cited "see"
E.L. Reid v. State
See State v. Adkins, 725 S.W.2d 660, 663 (Tenn.) (noting that proof sought by defendant’s counsel through pretrial discovery procedures was available as public records), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 (1987); State v. Cottrell, 868 S.W.2d 673, 677 (Tenn. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reid v. State
See State v. Adkins, 725 S.W.2d 660, 663 (Tenn.) (noting that proof sought by defendant’s counsel through pretrial discovery procedures was available as public records), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987); State v. Cottrell, 868 S.W.2d 673, 677 (Tenn.Crim.App.1992) (noting that judgment document sought through pretrial discovery was public record available for inspection).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sylvester Smith
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1233-1234 (10th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Mehl/Biophile International Corp. v. Milgraum
See Akzo N.V. v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 808 F.2d 1471, 1479 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Snyder
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1239 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987) (noting that “[c]omments on the defendant’s further dangerousness and the chances for rehabilitation are ... permissible.”).
cited
Cited "see"
General Elec. Co. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
See Akzo N.V. v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 808 F.2d 1471 , 1479 (Fed.Cir.1986), cer t. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Matthews v. Price
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1236 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 26,490 United States of America v. William R. Kennedy, Jr.
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1237 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987); see also Greschner, 802 F.2d at 377 (requiring deprivation of a substantial benefit at trial). 7 In Coleman, 802 F.2d at 1237 , we held that a defendant’s allegations “that his attorney was overworked, that many witnesses were involved in the ease, and that the state’s resources far surpassed those of the defense” were insufficient to show that the denial of an investigator violated the defendant’s due process rights.
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Wilson v. Michael Carr
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1242 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See DiGregorio, 605 F.2d at 1190 (fact that a codefendant’s admission tended to corroborate government’s case against the defendant is insufficient, standing alone, to trigger Bru-ton)-, United States v. Rawwad, 807 F.2d 294, 296 (1st Cir.1986) (“[t]he mere fact of corroboration is not enough to warrant finding a Bruton violation”), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987). *1230 The right of confrontation ensures that a criminal defendant can cross-examine his or her accusers.
cited
Cited "see"
Sri International, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.
See Akzo N.V. v. United States International Trade Commission, 808 F.2d 1471 , 1482, 1 USPQ2d 1241, 1247 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hawkins v. State
(2×)
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227 , 1237 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 . 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987). *600 In Shelton v. State, 793 P.2d 866, 873-874 (Okl.Cr. 1990), Appellant's co-defendant, the Court applied the following analysis: Relying on Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), Appellant next contends the trial court denied him due process by refusing to either appoint an investigator to assist with his defense or grant his attorney travel funds to be used for investigation of his case.
cited
Cited "see"
Penda Corp. v. United States
See Akzo N.V. v. United, States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 808 F.2d 1471 , 1481 (Fed.Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald Rickerson, Cross-Appellee v. Robert Tansy, Warden, Cross-Appellant
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1235 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 (1987). 7 Applying those guiding principles to the case at hand, we are not persuaded that defense counsel's failure to call witnesses to testify as to Petitioner's general alcohol abuse prejudiced the defense at sentencing. 1 Defense counsel actively participated in the sentencing phase by cross-examining prosecution witnesses and making argument to the court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calixtro Torres-Rodriguez, United States of America v. Ricardo Guardado, United States of America v. Trinidad J. Estrada-Solorzano, United States of America v. Am Paro Madriz
See United States v. Watkins, 811 F.2d 1408 , 1411 n. 4 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987) (prejudice analysis of Harris survives Rojas-Contreras ) 6 Because we resolve Madriz' challenge on Speedy Trial grounds, we need not address the challenges under the more general continuance doctrine of United States v. Flynt, 756 F.2d at 1358 -62 7 Madriz did not object to this instruction at trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation, Revlon, Inc., and Rorer Group Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Miles, Inc., Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation and Revlon, Inc. v. Chiron Corporation
See Akzo N.V. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 808 F.2d 1471 , 1479, 1 USPQ2d 1241, 1245 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987) (anticipatory reference must be enabling); In re Brown, 329 F.2d 1006, 1011 , 141 USPQ 245 , 249 (CCPA 1964).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Torres-Rodriguez
See United States v. Watkins, 811 F.2d 1408 , 1411 n. 4 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987) (prejudice analysis of Harris survives Rojas-Contreras). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.
See Akzo N. V. v. United States Int’l Trade Comm’n, 808 F.2d 1471 , 1479, 1 USPQ2d 1241, 1245 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987) (anticipatory reference must be enabling); In re Brown, 329 F.2d 1006, 1011 , 141 USPQ 245 , 249 (CCPA 1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia Thom
This standard is applied by examining “the eomment in context to evaluate the motive behind the statement and its impact on the jury.” Dorsey, 819 F.2d at 1061 ; see United States v. Watkins, 811 F.2d 1408, 1412 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Rodriguez
(2×)
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1239 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987); Brooks v. Kemp, 762 F.2d at 1403 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Saffle
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227 (10th Cir.1986) (Coleman I ), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Saffle
See Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227 (10th Cir.1986) (Coleman I), cert, denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed. 2d 383 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackmon v. State
(2×)
When discussing the sufficiency of a no-adverse-inference instruction as it related to a requested jury instruction on the same subject, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in United States v. Gomez-Olivas, 897 F.2d 500, 502 (10th Cir.1990), stated: “In Carter [v. Kentucky, 450 U.S. 288 (1981),] the Supreme Court stated expressly that ‘a criminal trial judge must give a “no-adverse-inference” jury instruction’ only ‘when requested by a defendant to do so.’ 450 U.S. at 300 , 101 S.Ct. at 1119 ; see also Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1234-35 (10th Cir.1986),…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gallegos
Only if the “totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation reveal both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension may a court properly conclude that the Miranda rights have been waived.” Moran, 475 U.S. at 421 , 106 S.Ct. 1135 ; see also United States v. Rohrbach, 813 F.2d 142 (8th Cir.1987) (totality of the circumstances includes the tactics used by the police, the details of the inter *932 rogation, and any characteristics of the accused that might cause his will to be easily overborne), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.
See also Akzo N.V. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 808 F.2d 1471 , 1479 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987); In re King, 801 F.2d 1324, 1326 (Fed.Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mabe
See, e.g., United States v. Rohrbach, 813 F.2d 142, 144-45 (8th Cir.) (defendant’s history of alcoholism and suicide attempts did not render involuntary his allegedly coerced confession), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. Chippas
The granting of a severance is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the defendant seeking severance bears a “heavy burden in demonstrating clear and compelling prejudice. ...” United States v. Kabbaby, 672 F.2d 857, 861 (11th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Watkins, 811 F.2d 1408, 1410 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 381 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Gomez-Olivas
Although the Court in Carter did not address this aspect of the requested instruction, De Hernandez, 745 F.2d at 1309 , held “that for an instruction on this [no-adverse-inference] point to be complete it should include the compulsion aspect.” 1 *502 The instruction given in this case was virtually identical to the instruction challenged and disapproved in De Hernandez, 745 F.2d at 1309 . 2 In this case, however, the defendant’s proposed no-adverse-inference instruction, unlike those requested in Carter and De Hernandez , did not include a statement on the compulsion aspect — that defe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark Wellington
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Rawwad, 807 F.2d 294, 296 (1st Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2490 , 96 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987); United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1, 13 (1st Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Sawyer v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
(2×)
See, e.g., Coleman v. Brown, 802 F.2d 1227, 1238-41 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 107 S.Ct. 2491 , 96 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987); see also Campbell v. Kincheloe, 829 F.2d 1453, 1460-61 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 380 , 102 L.Ed.2d 369 (1988); Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593, 596-97 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 836 , 108 S.Ct. 116 , 98 L.Ed.2d 74 (1987); Mann v. Dugger, 844 F.2d 1446, 1457-58 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salerno
See also U.S. v. Taylor, 562 F.2d 1345, 1365-66 (2d Cir.1977) (conviction affirmed where deliberations continued for almost two full days after the trial court’s undisclosed communication with a juror), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 2958 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Klein
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-6824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1987.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.