Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 484 U.S. 171 (1988).

Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 484 U.S. 171 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 2× 13.5 score

G Cite

cited 3× by 1 distinct case · …mature minor or an immature minor in whose best interest it is to have an abortion has a constitutional right-to have an abortion without notifying her parents. ⚠ not in text

114 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Reproductive Health Services v. Marshall (almd, 2017-07-28)

Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1987 2006 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗

examined Cited as authority (quoted) Reproductive Health Services v. Marshall (3×)

M.D. Ala. · 2017 · quote attribution · 3 verbatim quotes · confidence low

mature minor or an immature minor in whose best interest it is to have an abortion has a constitutional right-to have an abortion without notifying her parents.

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Tiedemann

Utah · 2007 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high

cloereive police activity is a necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not 'voluntary' within the meaning of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.

discussed Cited as authority (rule) The Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores

Ill. · 2013 · confidence medium

The cause was remanded to the district court “for a determination of the constitutionality of the waiver of notice proceedings when such rules are enacted.” Id. at 1545. ¶ 10 The Seventh Circuit’s opinion was affirmed by the United States Supreme Court, without opinion, “by an equally divided court.” Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 484 U.S. 171, 172 (1987) (per curiam) (Zbaraz III). ¶ 11 Subsequently, then-Attorney General Neil Hartigan and then-State’s Attorney Cecil Partee petitioned the federal district court to review the constitutionality of the 1983 Act in light of Illinois Supreme Cou…

discussed Cited as authority (rule) Miller v. State

Ind. · 2002 · confidence medium

It is the State's burden to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant voluntarily waived his rights, and that the defendant's confession was voluntarily given." Schmitt, 730 N.E.2d at 148 . 4 In looking at the totality of the circumstances from all the evidence, many factors may be considered including: the crucial element of police coercion, Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515, 522 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478, 484 (1986); the length of the interrogation, Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 822 US. 143, 153-54, 64 S.Ct. 921, 926-27 , 88 L.Ed. 1192, 1199 (1944); its location, see Reck v. …

cited Cited as authority (rule) New York State Electric & Gas Corporation v. Secretary of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

2d Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium

Myers, 484 U.S. at 989, 108 S.Ct. at 479 (1987) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).

discussed Cited "see" Stevens v. State

Ind. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high

See Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515, 522 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478, 484 (1986)(holding that even when defendant's mental condition is questioned, coercive police conduct is a predicate to finding a defendant's confession involuntary); Petti-ford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 925, 928 (Ind.1998)("Although a person's mental condition is relevant to the issue of susceptibility to police coercion, where the person voluntarily makes a confession without police coercion the confession may be considered in spite of the mental condition.").

8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F.2d 1532, 1545 (7th Cir.1985) ("Severance is improper if the unconstitutional provision is an integral part of the statutory enactment viewed in its entirety." ) (internal quotation omitted), aff'd by an equally divided court, 484 U.S. 171 , 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987).

examined Cited "see" Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota (3×)

8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F.2d 1532, 1545 (7th Cir.1985) (“Severance is improper if the unconstitutional provision is an integral part of the statutory enactment viewed in its en *918 tirety.”) (internal quotation omitted), aff'd by an equally divided court, 484 U.S. 171 , 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987).

examined Cited "see" John R. Weber v. James P. Murphy (3×)

7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F.2d 1532, 1544 (7th Cir.1985), aff 'd 484 U.S. 171 , 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987).

discussed Cited "see" Hodgson v. Minnesota (2×)

SCOTUS · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high

See Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F. 2d 1532, 1552 (CA7 1985) (Coffey, J., dissenting), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 484 U. S. 171 (1987).

discussed Cited "see" PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASS'N OF ATLANTA A. v. Harris (2×)

N.D. Ga. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high

See Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 484 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987). [16] Courts have split on the issue.

discussed Cited "see" Planned Parenthood Ass'n of the Atlanta Area, Inc. v. Harris (2×)

N.D. Ga. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high

See Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 484 U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987). 16 Courts have split on the issue.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hodgson v. State of Minnesota (2×)

8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low

See Akron, 462 U.S. at 441 n. 31, 103 S.Ct. at 2498 n. 31; Matheson, 450 U.S. at 420 and n. 9, 101 S.Ct. at 1177 and n. 9 (Powell, J., concurring) (stating that the rationale for requiring a state to provide a judicial bypass to a consent requirement is applicable to notification statutes); id. at 428 n. 3, 101 S.Ct. at 1181 n. 3 (Marshall, J., dissenting); see also Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F.2d 1532, 1539 (7th Cir.1985), aff'd without op., --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987); Pearson, 716 F.2d at 1132.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hodgson v. Minnesota (2×)

8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low

See Akron, 462 U.S. at 441 n. 31, 103 S.Ct. at 2498 n. 31; Matheson, 450 U.S. at 420 and n. 9, 101 S.Ct. at 1177 and n. 9 (Powell, J., concurring) (stating that the rationale for requiring a state to provide a judicial bypass to a consent requirement is applicable to notification statutes); id. at 428 n. 3, 101 S.Ct. at 1181 n. 3 (Marshall, J., dissenting); see also Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F.2d 1532, 1539 (7th Cir.1985), aff’d without op., — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 479 , 98 L.Ed.2d 478 (1987); Pearson, 716 F.2d at 1132.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." City of Milwaukee v. K.F. (2×)

Wis. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., Zbaraz v. Hartigan, 763 F.2d 1532, 1536 (7th Cir. 1985), aff’d 108 S. Ct. 479 (1987), reh’g denied 108 S.Ct. 1064 (1988) ("The constitutional rights of minors do not receive lesser protection than the rights of adults.”)- However, it has become a well-recognized precept of constitutional law that a statute or ordinance which might be unconstitutional as applied to an adult might be constitutional as applied with respect to juveniles.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 75

Cited "see" 16

Cited "see, e.g." 6

Compared "cf." 6

Procedural disposition 4

Cited as authority (quoted) 4

Cited as authority (rule) 3

Treatment by court

ca7	0R/0Y/3G/4P	20
ca8	0R/0Y/10G	17
ca4	0R/0Y/0G	13
ilnd	0R/0Y/0G	10
ca6	0R/0Y/0G	8
ca10	0R/0Y/0G	6
ca2	0R/0Y/1G	4
ca3	0R/0Y/0G	4
gand	0R/0Y/4G	4
scotus	0R/0Y/2G	4
almd	0R/0Y/3G	3
ca9	0R/0Y/0G	3

Federal circuit treatment

7th Cir.	Pos	0R/0Y/3G/4P	7
8th Cir.	Pos	0R/0Y/10G	10
4th Cir.	Pos	0R/0Y/0G	1
11th Cir.	Pos	0R/0Y/7G	7

Frequently cited alongside

#1	neutral	Zbaraz	co-cited 25×
#2	green	Danforth	co-cited 19×
#3	red	Roe	co-cited 17×
#4	green	Bellotti	co-cited 17×
#5	red	Akron Reproductive Health	co-cited 16×
#6	green	Planned Parenthood KC	co-cited 16×
#7	red	Thornburgh	co-cited 14×
#8	green	HL	co-cited 13×
#9	green	Hodgson	co-cited 9×
#10	green	Reproductive Health	co-cited 9×
#11	red	Casey	co-cited 9×
#12	green	Lambert	co-cited 7×

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

HARTIGAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
v.
ZBARAZ ET AL.

85-673.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb 22, 1988.

484 U.S. 171

108 S. Ct. 479

98 L. Ed. 2d 478

1987 U.S. LEXIS 5210

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Per Curiam.

Cited by 34 opinions | Published

2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases

Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%

Citer courts: M.D. Alabama (3) · Utah Supreme Court (1)

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Michael J. Hayes, First Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs for appellant Hartigan were Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, pro se, Roma Jones Stewart, former Solicitor General, Shawn W. Denney, Solicitor General, and Rita M. Novak, Assistant Attorney General.

Colleen K. Connell argued the cause for appellees. With her on the briefs were Marc O. Beem and Harvey Grossman.^[*]

[*172] PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

[*] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the State of Nevada by Brian McKay, Attorney General, and Ellen F. Whittemore, Deputy Attorney General; for the State of Ohio et al. by Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Attorney General of Ohio, David J. Kovach, Assistant Attorney General, Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona, Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General of Indiana, Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General of Minnesota, William L. Webster, Attorney General of Missouri, and David R. Wilkinson, Attorney General of Utah; for Americans United for Life Legal Defense Fund by Dennis J. Horan, Edward R. Grant, Maura K. Quinlan, Clarke D. Forsythe, and Ann-Louise Lohr; for the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights by Steven Frederick McDowell; for the Family Research Council et al. by Lynn D. Wardle; and for the United States Catholic Conference by John A. Liekweg and Mark E. Chopko.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists et al. by Benjamin W. Heineman, Jr., Carter G. Phillips, Ann E. Allen, Stephan E. Lawton, and Laurie R. Rockett; for the American Psychological Association by Donald N. Bersoff and David W. Ogden; for the American Public Health Association et al. by Patricia Hennessey and Dara Klassel; for the Judicial Consent for Minors Lawyer Referral Panel et al. by Jamie Ann Sabino; for the National Abortion Rights Action League et al. by Rhonda Copelon, Anne E. Simon, Nadine Taub, and Kathryn Kolbert; and for Pregnant Minors Desiring Confidential Abortions in Minnesota and Massachusetts et al. by Janet Benshoof, Lynn M. Paltrow, Rachael N. Pine, William Z. Pentelovitch, and John H. Henn.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the American Life League, Inc., by Thomas Patrick Monaghan; for American Victims of Abortion by James Bopp, Jr.; and for Concerned Women for America by Charles F. Simon and Jordan W. Lorence.