green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sandra P. Heagerty Heagerty Family Trust v. Home Savings of America, F.A., a Corporation Serrano Reconveyance Co., a California Corporation
Id. at 910.
cited
Cited "see"
Cordova v. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya De Puerto Rico
See King v. California, 784 F.2d 910 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 47 , 98 L.Ed.2d 11 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. IRS
See Okin v. ___ ____ Commissioner, 808 F.2d 1338, 1340-42 (discussing the purpose and ____________ constitutionality of the AMT), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 (1987); ____________ Warfield v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 179, 184 (1985) (rejecting ________ ____________ argument that imposition of the AMT was unfair because income- producing transaction was only a "one-time deal;" "[t]here is no justification for creating such an exception to the express terms" of Section 55); see also Rawlins v. Commissioner, 1995 WL ________ _______ ____________ 610605, at *5-8, 70 T.C.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States
See Okin v. Commissioner, 808 F.2d 1338, 1340-42 (9th Cir.) (discussing the purpose and constitutionality of the AMT), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 45 , 98 L.Ed.2d 10 (1987); Warfield v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 179, 184 , 1985 WL 15306 (1985) (rejecting argument that imposition of the AMT was unfair because income-producing transaction was only a “one-time deal;” “[tjhere is no justification for creating such an exception to the express terms” of Section 55); see also Rawlins v. Commissioner, 1995 WL 610605 , at *5-8, 70 T.C.M.
cited
Cited "see"
Bermudez v. First of America Bank Champion, N.A.
See King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 914-915 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 47 , 98 L.Ed.2d 11 (1987); Jones v. TransOhio Sav.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rouse v. Nielsen
See King v. California, 784 F.2d 910 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 47 , 98 L.Ed.2d 11 (1987); Jones v. TransOhio Savings Assn., 747 F.2d 1037 (6th Cir.1984); Davis v. Edgemere Finance Co., 523 F.Supp. 1121, 1125 (D.Md.1981) (the doctrine of fraudulent concealment could, in the proper case, operate to toll the limitations period of § 1640(e)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Dixon v. James A. Chrans, Dick Irving, S. Jordan
See Hughes v. Sheriff of Fall River County Jail, 814 F.2d 532, 536 (8th Cir.) (applying state tolling law for prisoners despite express tolling exception for § 1983 claims), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 46 , 98 L.Ed.2d 10 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnold v. Waterfield Mortgage Co.
See e.g., King v. State of California, 784 F.2d 910, 913 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 47 , 98 L.Ed.2d 11 , reh. denied, 484 U.S. 971 , 108 S.Ct. 474 , 98 L.Ed.2d 412 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Daytona Beach v. Amsel
See also Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 495 So.2d 801, 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 802 , 108 S.Ct. 45 , 98 L.Ed.2d 10 (1987) "decisions overruling earlier precedent are generally given retroactive effect whereby judicial construction of a statute is deemed to relate back to the enactment of the statute." Since the Barragan decision is silent on the question of retrospective application, it must be presumed to have both retrospective as well as prospective application.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hardin v. Straub
See, e. g., Hughes v. Sheriff of Fall Riper County Jail, 814 F. 2d 532 (CA8) (despite South Dakota statute’s express exclusion of federal civil rights suits, holds plaintiff en *538 titled to benefit of State’s tolling provision), appeal dism'd, 484 U. S. 802 (1987); Bailey v. Faulkner, 765 F. 2d 102 (CA7 1985) (applying Tuntanio, holds Indiana tolling statute not inconsistent with § 1983’s policies, though “hopelessly archaic” given inmates’ access to federal courts); Whitson v. Baker, 755 F. 2d 1406 (CA11 1985) (per curiam) (affirms State Supreme Court opinion interpreting Alaba…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Coats
v.
Woods
v.
Woods
No. 86-7142.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.