green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…prolonged confinement of an arrested person without a hearing to determine whether he is the person named in the warrant would be a deprivation of liberty without due process of law and thus violate the fourteenth amendment
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 47 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rafael Garcia v. City of Chicago, Illinois, Anna Gall, County of Cook
(2×)
prolonged confinement of an arrested person without a hearing to determine whether he is the person named in the warrant would be a deprivation of liberty without due process of law and thus violate the fourteenth amendment
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ceballos
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133-34 (1st Cir.) (noncapital case), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S. Ct. 162 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York, a New York Corporation v. National Title Resources Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation
See Leichihman v. Pickwick, Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1267 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Fidelity Natl. Title v. Natl. Title
See Leichihman v. Pickwick, Int'l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1267 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Perry
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony v. State
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987); United States v. *128 Senatore, supra; See also Wayne LaFave and Austin W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles B. Dietzen v. William Mork, John P. Snider, and Waupaca County
See Brown v. Patterson, 823 F.2d 167, 169 (7th Cir.) ("Although a prolonged confinement of an arrested person without a hearing to determine whether he is the person named in the warrant would be a deprivation of liberty without due process of law and thus violate the Fourteenth Amendment, there is no suggestion that 24 hours was unreasonable in the circumstances."), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See Leichihman v. Pickwick Int'l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1270 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987); Holley, 771 F.2d at 1167.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cartagena-Carrasquillo
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 132-33 (1st Cir.) (prosecutor’s improper closing argument that defendant “sounds like Peter who for the third time denied Christ” was deliberate and unprovoked, but was not objected to and did not produce plain error in light of overall jury instructions, even without an instruction specifically addressed to the prejudicial comment), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartman v. Smith & Davis Mfg. Co.
See Leichihman v. Pickwick International, 814 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir.1987) (ADEA claim), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987); [4] Watson v. Gulf & Western Industries, 650 F.2d 990, 993 (9th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Fairley v. Zelenik
See Brown v. Patterson, 823 F.2d 167, 169 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 117 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Joann's Launder Center, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See Leichihman v. Pickwick Int'l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1267 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rinehart v. City Of Independence
See Leichihman v. Pickwick Int'l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1270 (8th Cir.) (no adverse inference can be drawn in reduction-in-force case if we apply normal prima facie standards because the employer's action is readily explained by employer's economic hardship or downturn in business), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987); see also Barnes, 896 F.2d at 1465 (in reduction-in-force case proving the normal elements of the prima facie case is not enough because no evidence presented under such test that the workforce reductions were not the reason for the adverse employment acti…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rinehart v. City of Independence
See Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1270 (8th Cir.) (no adverse inference can be drawn in reduction-in-force case if we apply normal prima facie standards because the employer’s action is readily explained by employer’s economic hardship or downturn in business), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987); see also Barnes, 896 F.2d at 1465 (in reduction-in-force ease proving the normal elements of the prima facie case is not enough because no evidence presented under such test that the workforce reductions were not the reason for the adverse employmen…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ortiz
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d ___ _____________ ____ 120, 133 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987). _____ ______ Accordingly, we reject defendant's prosecutorial misconduct argument. -11- 11 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See ___ United States v. Gjonaj, 861 F.2d 143, 144 (6th Cir. 1988); see _____________ ______ ___ also United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 135 (1st Cir.), cert. ____ ______________ ____ _____ denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).5 ______ The government asserts that the FJDA is inapplicable to appellants simply because the indictment charged that the con- _______ spiracy spanned their eighteenth birthdays.
cited
Cited "see"
61 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1607, 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,278 Joseph R. Weber v. American Express Co. Systems Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sai-Systems Associates, Inc., D/B/A American Express Information Services Company, Health Systems Group, D/B/A the Health Systems Group, D/B/A American Express Health Systems
See Leichihman v. Pickwick Int'l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1269 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dino Howard, (92-1566/1567), Frank Bufkin, (92-1608), Marcus David Cerna, (92-1675), and Donnie Riggs, (92-1679)
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 126 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Weber v. American Express Co.
See Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1269 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moreno
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d ___ ______________________ 120, 134 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987). ____ ______ What is no less disturbing is that, even after the warning embodied by this instruction, the prosecutor again departed from the straight and narrow in his closing.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moreno
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 134 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Moreno, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 134 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Slovacek, 24 MJ 140, 141-42 (CMA), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 115 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Terzado-Madruga
See United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 135 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cable Belt Conveyors, Inc. v. Alumina Partners of Jamaica
See Cable Belt Conveyors Inc. v. Alumina Partners of Jamaica, 669 F.Supp. 577 (S.D.N.Y.) (consolidating the proceedings), aff'd, 857 F.2d 1461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brathwaite v. People
See e.g., United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987) (references to the Bible are an improper appeal to jurors’ private religious beliefs); Evans v. Thigpen, 809 F.2d 239, 242 (5th Cir. 1987), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 814 F.2d 658 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1033 (1987) (biblical evidence is irrelevant during the sentencing phase).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zeigler v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int'l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Webner v. Titan Distribution, Inc.
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schultz v. Amick
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Waitek v. Dalkon Shield Trust
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Neely v. American Family Mutual Insurance
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greene v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133 (1st Cir.) (prosecutor's reference to religion constituted irrelevant and inflammatory appeal to jurors' religious beliefs and warranted "especial condemnation"), cert. denied 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Century Wrecker Corp. v. E.R. Buske Manufacturing Co.
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Vetter v. Farmland Industries, Inc.
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taylor
See id.; see also United States v. ___ ___ ___ ____ _____________ Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 ____ _____ ______ (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taylor
See id.; see also United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chadima v. National Fidelity Life Insurance
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Welch
See United States v. Gjonaj, 861 F.2d 143, 144 (6th Cir.1988); see also United States v. dry, 818 F.2d 120, 135 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987). 5 The government asserts that the FJDA is inapplicable to appellants simply because the indictment charged that the conspiracy spanned their eighteenth birthdays.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Snyder
See, e.g., United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133-34 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987) (prosecutor referred to defendant’s denial of Christ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Snyder
See, e.g., United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 133-34 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987) (prosecutor referred to defendant’s denial of Christ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Melvin White v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee Schay, United States of America v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee Schay
See also Leichihman v. Pickwick Int’l, 814 F.2d 1263, 1266 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sattari v. State
See also United States v. Giry , 818 F.2d 120 , 133-34 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987) (wherein the court ruled that, although it was improper for the prosecutor to use an analogy of Peter's denial of Christ to describe defendant's denial of criminal intent because it was an irrelevant and inflammatory appeal to the jurors' religious beliefs, it was harmless error due to unambiguous evidence of guilt); Robison v. Maynard , 829 F.2d 1501 , 1509 (10th Cir. 1987) (wherein the court ruled that the prosecutor's suggestion that the jury should "turn the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Angarone
See also Brown v. Patterson, 823 F.2d 167, 169 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 117 (1987) (police officer who arrests the wrong person in executing an arrest warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment unless the officer acts unreasonably).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Curcio
See also United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 130 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Giry
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-235.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.