green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hanauer v. Reich, Sec
See, e.g., Staacke, 841 F.2d at 281 (citing Kyne and hold- ing that "jurisdiction exists where [the Secretary of Labor] is charged with violating a clear statutory mandate or prohibition"); see also Brumley v. United States Dep't of Labor, 28 F.3d 746, 747 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 734 (1995); Woodruff v. United States Dep't of Labor, 954 F.2d 634, 639 (11th Cir. 1992); Owens v. Brock, 860 F.2d 1363, 1367 (6th Cir. 1988); but see Paluca v. Secretary of Labor, 813 F.2d 524, 527-28 (1st Cir. 1987) (stating, without consid- ering Kyne, that "[f]ederal employees have no right to ap…
discussed
Cited "but see"
James L. Hanauer v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor
(2×)
See, e.g., Staacke, 841 F.2d at 281 (citing Kyne and holding that “jurisdiction exists where [the Secretary of Labor] is charged with violating a clear statutory mandate or prohibition”); see also Brumley v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 28 F.3d 746, 747 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 734 , 130 L.Ed.2d 637 (1995); Woodruff v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 954 F.2d 634 , 639 (11th Cir.1992); Owens v. Brock, 860 F.2d 1363, 1367 (6th Cir.1988); but see Paluca v. Secretary of Labor, 813 F.2d 524, 527-28 (1st Cir.1987) (stating, without considering Kyne , that “[f]ede…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Brumley v. United States Department of Labor
But see Paluca v. Secretary, 813 F.2d 524 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied sub. nom Roberts v. Secretary of Labor, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987) (holding that though a district court has jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to the Secretary’s actions administering FECA, no jurisdiction exists to hear challenges based on statutory grounds).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rolo v. City Investing Co.
he time to file suit begins to run when the investor either knows or in the exercise of reasonable diligence could have discovered the facts on which the suit is based
discussed
Cited "see"
AGP Industries SA v. JPS Elastromerics Corp., Stevens Urethane Division
See E.A.S.T., Inc. Of Stamford v. M/V Alaia, 876 F.2d 1168, 1172 (5th Cir.1989) (‘‘[T]he Convention focuses on the situs of the arbitration, not upon the nationality of the parties.”) (citing National Iranian Oil Co. v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 817 F.2d 326 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
See generally United States v. Bank of New England, 821 F.2d 844, 854-56 (1st Cir.1987) C‘[K]nowledge obtained by corporate employees acting within the scope of their employment is imputed to the corporation.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987). 34 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dapuzzo v. Globalvest Management Co., L.P.
See National Iranian Oil Co. v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 817 F.2d 326, 331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987) (noting that under the Convention federal courts were granted power to compel arbitration only in signatory countries).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Zeta Chi Fraternity
Va. 1974). “[T]he corporation is considered to have acquired the collective knowledge of its employees and is held responsible for their failure to act accordingly.” Id.; see United States v. Bank of New England, N.A., 821 F.2d 844, 856 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marder
See United States v. Bank of New England, N.A., 821 F.2d 844, 854 (1st Cir.) ("A finding of willfulness under the Reporting Act must be supported by proof of the defendant's knowledge of the reporting requirements and his specific intent to commit the crime.”) (citations omitted) (interpreting the meaning of § 5322's willfulness provision in a context other than § 5324's anti-structuring provisions), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marder
See United States v. Bank of New England, N.A., ___ _____________ __________________________ 821 F.2d 844, 854 (1st Cir.) ("A finding of willfulness under the Reporting Act must be supported by proof of the defendant's knowledge of the reporting requirements and his specific intent to commit the crime.") (citations omitted) (interpreting the meaning of 5322's willfulness provision in a context other than 5324's anti-structuring provisions), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew v. Restivo, II
See United States v. Mize, 756 F.2d 353, 355 (5th Cir.1985) (reviewing alleged error in jury instruction for plain error where no objection made at trial), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987); United States v. Fitzpatrick, 581 F.2d 1221, 1223 (5th Cir.1978) (same). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. Nat'l Bank of Detroit
(2×)
See United States v Bank of New England, 821 F2d 844, 856 (CA 1,1987), cert den 484 US 943 (1987), 14 and citations therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Warrick
See U.S. v. Mize, 820 F.2d 118, 119-20 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987) (rejection of double jeopardy claim on appeal from first trial is the law of the case); U.S. v. Grabinski, 727 F.2d 681, 687 (8th Cir.1984). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Pratt v. Watkins
See Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Herrington, 826 F.2d 16, 27 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 327 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Farm & Home Savings Association, Thomas A. Williams, Ronald Meyer, Ronald Whitaker, Fred Wilmot and Leon Miller A/K/A Lee Miller
See United States v. Bank of New England, 821 F.2d 844, 850-51 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987); United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 792 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. American Investors, 879 F.2d 1087 , 1098-1099 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 368 , 107 L.Ed.2d 354 (1989); United States v. Thompson, 603 F.2d 1200, 1203-04 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Hayes, 827 F.2d 469, 472 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Cook, 745 F.2d 1311, 1315-16 (10th Cir.1984), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see"
Zechman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See National Iranian Oil Co. v. Ashland Oil, 817 F.2d 326, 335 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987); 9 U.S.C. § 4 (empowering the court to direct a recalcitrant arbitrator “to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the agreement”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co., Inc.
See Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Herrington, 826 F.2d 16, 28 (Em.App.) (upon a finding of good faith, district court declined to assess penalties), cer t. denied, Chamberlain v. United States, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 327 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cheryl Ranzy v. Single N Corporation
Corp., 211 F.3d 1217 , 1222 (11th Cir.2000) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also In re Salomon Inc. S’holders’ Derivative Litig., 68 F.3d 554, 561 (2d Cir.1995) (citing Nat’l Iranian Oil Co. v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 817 F.2d 326, 333-34 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
See, e.g., Osorio, 929 F.2d at 761 , citing United States v. Bank of New England, 821 F.2d 844, 855 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987) (finding no reason why similar principles of institutional responsibility should not be used to analyze the actions of individual government attorneys called upon to represent the government as an institution in matters of court-ordered disclosure obligations). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Texas v. American Blastfax, Inc.
See United States v. Pollution Serv. of Oswego, Inc., 763 F.2d 133, 134-35 (2nd Cir.1985) (finding officers liable under Rivers and Harbors Act for direct, personal involvement in illegal dumping; distinguishing Sexton Cove as involving liability “premised solely on [defendants’] corporate offices or ownership”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037 , 106 S.Ct. 605 , 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985); see also Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Herrington, 826 F.2d 16, 25 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1987) (“[P]ersonal responsibility for corporate liability may attach when the individual’s wrongful conduct causes…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nissan Van 1987 Vin Jn8
United States v. Beusch, 596 F.2d 871, 877 (9th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Bank of New England, 821 F.2d 844, 856 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 (1987). 2 15 Second, Big Island's "[f]ailure to exercise due care precludes reliance upon the innocent owner defense." United States v. $215,300 U.S. Currency, 882 F.2d 417, 420 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1005 (1990); cf. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co., 416 U.S. 663, 690 (1974) (forfeiture statute could constitutionally be applied to otherwise innocent owner who "voluntarily entrusted the lessees with possessi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ratzlaf v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Aversa, 984 F. 2d 493, 502 (1993) (en banc). [4] The dominant formulation of the standard for a willful violation of the related provisions demands "proof of the defendant's knowledge of the reporting requirement and his specific intent to commit the crime." United States v. Granda, 565 F. 2d 922, 926 (CA5 1978); see also United States v. Bank of New England, N. A., 821 F. 2d 844, 854 (CA1) ("willful" violation of § 5313 requires "`knowledge of the reporting requirements and [defendant's] specific intent to commit the crime' "), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 943 (1987); United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 91-1617
See, e.g., United States v. Bank of New England, N.A., 821 F.2d 844, 856 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987) (discussing general agency principles in the context of corporate criminal liability).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. One Parcel of Land Located at 7326 Highway 45 North, Three Lakes, Oneida County
See, e.g., United States v. Bank of New England, N.A., 821 F.2d 844, 856 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987) (discussing general agency principles in the context of corporate criminal liability).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary B. Moss v. Lynn Martin, Secretary, Department of Labor, and Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
See, e.g., Paluca v. Secretary of Labor, 813 F.2d 524 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 (1987) (district court has jurisdiction to consider constitutional challenge to Secretary of Labor's decisions, despite statute prohibiting judicial review); Rodrigues v. Donovan, 769 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir.1985) (district court has jurisdiction to review claim that workers' compensation benefits were suspended in violation of right to due process.) 4 Furthermore, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 provides that courts may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Hermann
Lampf , — U.S. at -, 111 S.Ct. at 2782 ; Short, 908 F.2d at 1391-92 ; see also Norris v. Wirtz, 818 F.2d 1329 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987) (Legislative history of § 13 indicates that Congress did not intend equitable tolling principles to apply in actions under the federal securities laws).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ceres Partners v. GEL Associates
Compare La Rosa Building Corp. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 542 F.2d 990, 991-93 (7th Cir.1976) (Indiana’s two-year period), with Norris v. Wirtz, 818 F.2d 1329, 1331-33 (7th Cir.) (Illinois’s three-year period), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987), and Cahill v. Ernst & Ernst, 625 F.2d at 153-56 (Wisconsin’s one-year/three-year period).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ceres Partners v. Gel Associates
Compare La Rosa Building Corp. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 542 F.2d 990, 991-93 (7th Cir.1976) (Indiana's two-year period), with Norris v. Wirtz, 818 F.2d 1329, 1331-33 (7th Cir.) (Illinois's three-year period), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987), and Cahill v. Ernst & Ernst, 625 F.2d at 153-56 (Wisconsin's one-year/three-year period).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Solmsen
See, e.g., Crawford v. La Boucherie Bernard, Ltd., 815 F.2d 117 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Welch v. Cadre Capital
See, e.g., Norris v. Wirtz, 818 F.2d 1329, 1332 (7th Cir.) (Easterbrook, J.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 329 , 98 L.Ed.2d 356 (1987); L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Jeffrey Cantrell v. William F. Kelley
See, e.g., United States v. Mize, 820 F.2d 118 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 943 , 108 S.Ct. 328 , 98 L.Ed.2d 355 (1987). 8 Cantrell, attaching special significance to the fact that a jury was waiting to be impaneled to try the case, argues that his reindictment after his original indictment had been nolle prossed subjects him to double jeopardy.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burtenshaw
v.
Ferry
v.
Ferry
No. 87-450.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.