green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
12.7 score
G Cite
cited 76× by 39 distinct cases ·
“Because Mr. Trackwell appears pro se, we review his pleadings and other papers liberally and hold them to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys.”
cited 5× by 1 distinct case ·
“A lack of diligence on the part of plaintiffs attorney does not justify equitable tolling”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[W]hen a party submits material beyond the pleadings in support of or opposing a motion to dismiss, the prior action on the part of the parties puts them on notice that the judge may treat the motions as a Rule 56 motion.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ssebanakitta v. United States Postal Service
because mr. trackwell appears pro se, we review his pleadings and other papers liberally and hold them to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. Lucas
when subject matter jurisdiction is dependent upon the same statute which provides the substantive claim in the case, the jurisdictional claim and the merits are considered to be intertwined.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gilmore v. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER STRONG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DIVISION
a lack of diligence on the part of plaintiffs attorney does not justify equitable tolling
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garcia v. Copenhaver, Bell
we find that the determination of whether qualifies as an employee under the federal discrimination statutes is both a jurisdictional question and an aspect of the substantive claim in her discrimination action.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Luis E. Garcia, M.D. v. Copenhaver, Bell & Associates, m.d.'s, P.A., Defendant-Third Party St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Third Party
we find that the determination of whether qualifies as an employee under the federal discrimination statutes is both a jurisdictional question and an aspect of the substantive claim in her discrimination action
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chandler v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
hen a party submits material beyond the pleadings in support of or opposing a motion to dismiss, the prior action on the part of the parties puts them on notice that the judge may treat the motions as a rule 56 motion.
cited
Cited "see"
Lucero v. Bureau of Collection Recovery, Inc.
See Holt v. United States, 46 F.3d at 1003 (citing to Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 , 259 n. 5 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Wright v. Cleo Wallace Centers
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 , 259 n. 5 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Benhardt v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF WYANDOTTE
See Harris v. City of Pagedale, 821 F.2d 499, 506 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 504 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomison
See Tello, 677 F.Supp. at 1440 (citing Foxgord v. Hischemoeller, 820 F.2d 1030, 1032 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tippett v. United States
See Domme v. United States, 61 F.3d 787, 789 (10th Cir. 1995). -3- merits, see Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 259 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987), the district court was required to convert the government’s 12(b)(1) motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) motion or a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, see Holt, 46 F.3d at 1003.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhoads v. Jones Financial Companies
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 261 (10th Cir.) (individual determined to be bona fide partner even though nature of work remained unchanged after becoming partner, she was supervised in her work and work assignments, and personnel file maintained), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Kevin Brian Fornshill v. Christopher W. Ruddy James Dale Davidson Agora, Incorporated, D/B/A Strategic Investment, LLC Western Center for Journalism
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 260 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Fornshill v. Ruddy
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 260 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Howell
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 259-60 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 484 U.S. 986 (1987) (district court properly converted motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment because both parties submitted affidavits be *346 yond the pleadings and the court properly considered them); Moody v. Town of Weymouth, 805 F.2d 30, 31 (1st Cir. 1986) (finding it proper for a court to convert a motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment and consider information outside pleadings, such as affidavits, even when the plaintiff was not given notice of this consideration if the plaintiff had received …
cited
Cited "see"
Young v. Vaughn
Willis v. Collins, 989 F.2d 187, 189 (5th Cir. 1993); accord Young v. Lynaugh, 821 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 (1987) v. Collins, 924 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter Washington Young v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania the District Attorney for Philadelphia County
Willis v. Collins, 989 F.2d 187, 189 (5th Cir.1993); accord Young v. Lynaugh, 821 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); Allen v. Collins, 924 F.2d 88 (5th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Callis v. Sellars
See Harris v. City of Pagedale, 821 F.2d 499 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 504 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987); Sherrell v. City of Longview, 683 F.Supp. 1108 (E.D.Tex.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darryl Scott Tunstall v. John M. Beck
See Stallcop v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 820 F.2d 1044 , 1050 n. 5 (9th Cir.) (declining to consider claim raised for the first time in opposition to motion for summary judgment, but never alleged in complaint), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987). 9 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
cited
Cited "see"
Scales v. Sonic Industries, Inc.
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomason v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 263 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); see, e.g., Deal, 5 F.3d at 118. 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Padilla
See State v. Ramming, 106 N.M. 42, 47 , 788 P.2d 914, 919 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 106 N.M. 7 , 738 P.2d 125 , and cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Transamerica Premier Insurance v. K & S Construction
R.Civ.P. 12(b); see Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 258-60 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Larsen Ex Rel. Larsen v. Early
R.Civ.P. 12(b); see Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 258-60 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mihalek Corp. v. State of Mich.
See Mihalek Corp. v. Michigan, 630 F.Supp. 9 (E.D.Mich.1985). 3 On appeal to this court, the judgment in favor of defendants was affirmed in Mihalek Corp. v. Michigan, 814 F.2d 290, 297 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
May Sun v. Asian American Recovery Services, Inc.
See Stallcop v. Kaiser Foundation Hosps., 820 F.2d 1044, 1050 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987); Jurado v. Eleven-Fifty Corp., 813 F.2d 1406, 1409 (9th Cir.1987); Yartzoff v. Thomas, 809 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
G. Kevin Jones v. Manuel Lujan, Secretary of the Interior. Sub. Nom. Donald P. Hodel, Defendant-Respondent
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karin D. Follin, John H. Stewart, Broadus v. Stewart, Jr., Donald L. Mason, and Christopher H. Crawford
See United States v. Hammond, 821 F.2d 473, 476 (8th Cir.) (individual conducted illegal gambling business by supplying paper to bettors and allowing phone to be used in gambling operation), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 502 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); see also United States v. Merrell, 701 F.2d at 55. 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Antonelli v. United States (In Re Antonelli)
See, Foxgord v. Hischemoeller, 820 F.2d 1030, 1032 (CA9 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Roybal
See State v. Ramming, 106 N.M. 42 , 738 P.2d 914 (Ct.App.) (evidence not devastating in its effect against defendant), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 275-276 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 986 (1987) (statutory redress under Title VII available only to those in employment relationship); Cobb v. Sun Papers, Inc., 673 F.2d 337, 340-341 (11th Cir.) (term “employee” given common law definition), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 874 (1982); Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826, 829-830 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Montoya
See State v. Ramming, 106 N.M. 42, 46 , 738 P.2d 914, 918 (Ct.App.) (when evidence does not unerringly and devastatingly refer to defendant, and does not form major portion of case against defendant, admission of evidence does not mandate severance, citing State v. Martinez, 102 N.M. 94 , 691 P.2d 887 (Ct.App.1984)), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Dancu v. Coopers & Lybrand
See EEOC Letter to Dancu (Defendant’s Exhibit D) (citing Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987)). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Greenwald v. Resnick
See Greenwald v. Department of Professional Regulation, 501 So.2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 511 So.2d 998 (Fla.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 502 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Redmon v. United States
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 260 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); Carey v. United States Postal Serv., 812 F.2d 621, 623 (10th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Redmon ex rel. Redmon v. United States
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 260 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); Carey v. United States Postal Serv., 812 F.2d 621, 628 (10th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arica Institute, Inc. v. Palmer
See Mihalek Corp. v. State of Michigan, 630 F.Supp. 9, 13 (E.D.Mich.1985) (“fact that both plaintiff and the creators of the state’s campaign sought to extol certain features of the state cannot form the basis of an infringement action”), aff'd, 814 F.2d 290 (6th Cir.), on reh’g, 821 *1063 F.2d 327 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987); McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. Worth Publishers, Inc., 335 F.Supp. 415, 421 (S.D.N.Y.1971) (defendant’s use of technical jargon in economics textbook did not infringe).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ann B. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse
(2×)
See Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); EEOC v. Dowd & Dowd, Ltd., 736 F.2d 1177 (7th Cir.1984); Burke v. Friedman, 556 F.2d 867 (7th Cir.1977); cf. Hyland v. New Haven Radiology Associates, P.C., 794 F.2d 793 (2d Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Haar
See State v. Ramming, 106 N.M. 42 , 738 P.2d 914 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Jane Doe \A\" v. Special School District of Saint Louis County"
See Harris v. City of Pagedale, 821 F.2d 499, 504-07 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 504 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sheldon
See State v. Ramming, 106 N.M. 42 , 738 P.2d 914 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987); State v. Jacobs, 91 N.M. 445 , 575 P.2d 954 (Ct.App.1978), overruled on other grounds, State v. Moore, 109 N.M. 119 , 782 P.2d 91 (Ct.App.1989); State v. Toussaint, 84 N.M. 677 , 506 P.2d 1224 (Ct.App.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.
See Foxgord v. Hischemoeller, 820 F.2d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir.) (where a statute enumerated parties included, a court can infer that the unnamed parties are excluded), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987); see also Developer’s Mortgage Co. v. TransOhio Sav.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. Gates
See, e.g., Harris v. City of Pagedale, 821 F.2d 499 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 504 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987) reh. denied, 484 U.S. 1083 , 108 S.Ct. 1066 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1988). (aldermen involved in several investigations of sexually predatory police officer and who concluded that allegations against him were true, but took no action prior to the incident giving rise to the lawsuit, held responsible on supervisorial liability theory).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Katz v. City of Aurora
Standard of Review If, on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56.... ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b); see also Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 260 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987) (citing Nichols v. United States, 796 F.2d 361, 364 (10th Cir.1986)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown
(2×)
Compare ante, at 408 (sheriff was final policymaker in hiring matters), with Greensboro Professional Fire Fighters Assn., Local 3157 v. Greensboro, 64 F. 3d 962, 965-966 (CA4 1995) (fire chief was not policymaker with respect, to hiring and firing), and Harris v. Pagedale, 821 F. 2d 499, 505-508 (CA8) (municipality was deliberately indifferent to charges of sexual assault), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 986 (1987), with Wilson v. Chicago, 6 F. 3d 1233, 1240-1241 (CA7 1993) (municipal policymaker was not deliberately indifferent to charges of abuse of pretrial detainees), cert. denied, 511 U. S. 1088…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kristie Andrews v. Randy Fowler
See also Harris v. Pagedale, 821 F.2d 499, 504 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 504 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Fowler
See also Harris v. Pagedale, 821 F.2d 499, 504 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 504 , 98 L.Ed.2d 502 (1987). 15 We agree with the district court's conclusion that Andrews failed to demonstrate a city policy or custom of failing to act on or investigate prior complaints of sexual abuse by police officers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vick v. Foote, Inc.
See, e.g., Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 259 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987) (“We find that the determination of whether [the plaintiff] qualifies as an employee under the federal discrimination statutes is both a jurisdictional question and an aspect of the substantive claim in her discrimination action. [Thus,] the motion was appropriately characterized as a motion for summary judgment.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Lee Tucker v. Jack R. Duckworth, Superintendent
See, e.g., id. (finding nexus between challenged convictions and custody despite existence of ten additional prior felonies when only one prior felony was required to establish habitual offender status). 10 The state also argues that the presence of at least two other supporting convictions renders harmless any defect in the Ohio conviction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New Cherokee Corp.
Cortec Industries, Inc., v. Sum Holding L.P., 949 F.2d 42, 47 (2d Cir.), cert. den. — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1561 , 118 L.Ed.2d 208 (1991); see also Wheeler v. Hurdman, 825 F.2d 257, 258-59 (10th Cir.), cert. den. 484 U.S. 986 , 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d. 501 (1987) (where subject matter jurisdiction is intertwined with a substantive claim the motion should be converted into one for summary judgment).
Greenwald
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 87-663.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1987.
484 U.S. 986
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.