green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alex Dandy
those cases that have sustained mail fraud convictions have done so where the 'bottom line' of the scheme or artifice had the inevitable result of effecting monetary or property losses to the employer or to the state.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mariani
(2×)
See United States v. Asher, 854 F.2d 1483, 1494 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodrich v. Betkoski
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 91 (3d Cir.1988) (“CERCLA failed to address many important issues, including corporate successor liability.”), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); see also United States v. Carolina Transformer Co., 978 F.2d 832, 837 (4th Cir.1992) (explaining that CERCLA is silent on this subject); Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco, Inc., 909 F.2d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.1990) (“Congress has not addressed the issue of successor liability under CERCLA.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodrich v. Betkoski
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 91 (3d Cir.1988) ("CERCLA failed to address many important issues, including corporate successor liability."), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); see also United States v. Carolina Transformer Co., 978 F.2d 832, 837 (4th Cir.1992) (explaining that CERCLA is silent on this subject); Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco, Inc., 909 F.2d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.1990) ("Congress has not addressed the issue of successor liability under CERCLA."). 49 Nonetheless, most courts have read CERCLA as making succes…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Rohm and Haas Company v. Buckeye Pipe Line Company, Rohm and Haas Company
(2×)
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3d Cir.1988) (statutory merger) (successor corporation was liable for prior corporation's CERCLA liability in the absence of an indemnification clause), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Borough of Sayreville v. Union Carbide Corp.
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 89 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); see generally Transtech, 798 F.Supp. at 1086-87 ; Gould, 901 F.Supp. at 910-11 (discussing Third Circuit CERCLA precedent regarding cost recovery).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael C. Coyle
See United States v. Asher, 854 F.2d 1483, 1497 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coyle
See United States v. Asher, 854 F.2d 1483, 1497 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry
See United States v. Asher, 854 F.2d 1483, 1494 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S. Ct. 836 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Henry Mowry Mike
(2×)
See United States v. Asher, 854 F.2d 1483, 1494 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989). 11 We note that once the Commission's deposits actually were awarded to one of the bidding banks, they legally would be considered the property of that bank.
discussed
Cited "see"
Juniper Development v. Kahn
See 42 U.S.C. 9613(f)(1) ("[T]he ___ court may allocate response costs among liable parties using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate."); see ___ also Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d ____ _______________________________ ______________ 86, 90 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Mostoufi v. Presto Food Stores, Inc.
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
City Environmental, Inc. v. U.S. Chemical Co.
See, Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3rd Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco, Inc., 909 F.2d 1260 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Mexico Feed & Seed Co., 980 F.2d 478 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Carolina Transformer Co., 978 F.2d 832 (4th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mexico Feed & Seed Co.
Anspec, 922 F.2d at 1247 ; see Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex, 851 F.2d 86 , 92 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mexico Feed and Seed Company, Inc. James F. Covington, Individually Mary J. Covington James F. Covington, Doing Business as Mexico Feed and Seed Company, Jack Pierce, Individually and as a Director of Pierce Waste Oil Service Pierce Waste Oil Service, Inc. Martin J. Pierce, a Director of Pierce Waste Oil Service, Inc., Moreco Energy, Inc., United States of America v. Mexico Feed and Seed Company, Inc. James F. Covington, Individually Mary J. Covington James F. Covington, Doing Business as Mexico Feed and Seed Company, Jack Pierce, Individually and as a Director of Pierce Waste Oil Service Pierce Waste Oil Service, Inc., Martin J. Pierce, a Director of Pierce Waste Oil Service, Inc.
Anspec, 922 F.2d at 1247 ; see Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex, 851 F.2d 86 , 92 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 90 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co., 714 F.Supp. 1439, 1451-52 (W.D.Mich.1989); United States v. Vineland Chemical Co., 692 F.Supp. 415, 423 (D.N.J.1988); Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Armstrong World Indus., 669 F.Supp. 1285 , 1291 n. 7 (E.D.Pa.1987); United States v. Stringfellow, 661 F.Supp. 1053, 1062 (C.D.Cal.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry P. Casoni, A/K/A Pete Casoni
See United States v. Asher, 854 F.2d 1483, 1501-15 (3d Cir.1988) (Higginbotham, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
T-K City Disposal, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance
See U.S. v. Distler, 741 F.Supp. 643 (W.D.Ky.1990) (citing Smith Land and Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3d Cir.1988) cert denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dole v. H.M.S. Direct Mail Service, Inc.
See, Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3rd Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989) (where CERCLA silent on issue of successor liability, court consulted legislative history to ensure imposition of successor liability not inconsistent with scheme of statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of California
(2×)
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 91 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hodge v. Henderson
See Saldana v. New York, 850 F.2d 117, 119-21 (2d Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 968 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
GRM Industries, Inc. v. Wickes Manufacturing Co.
See Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3d Cir.1988) (general doctrine of corporate successor liability appropriate in CERCLA action, thus successor liability imposed on corporation which merged or consolidated with responsible party), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. NG US 1, Inc.
See also Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 92 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 (1989) (as between a successor corporation and the taxpayers, “entities which had a specific role in the production or continuation of the hazardous condition” should bear the burden of cleanup); John S. Boyd Co. v. Boston Gas Co., 992 F.2d at 405-406 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bourne v. Center on Children, Inc.
See also Forest Hills Early Learning Center, Inc. v. Jackson, 846 F.2d 260, 264 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989) (following Amos, and noting that “if an exemption is permissible in the context of employment practices in a gymnasium, one can only be more solidly justified where it acts to prevent state interference with church programs that provide education and care for children.”) The cases cited by appellant in his brief are irrelevant or distinguishable.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Hawk
See, e.g., Saldana v. State of New York, 850 F.2d 117, 119 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 968 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Allwaste Environmental Services/North Atlantic, Inc. v. Pastore
See, e.g., Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 91-92 (3rd Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Blosenski
See also, Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 92 (3d Cir.1988) (in resolving successor liability issues under CERCLA, district court on remand “must consider national uniformity”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); United States v. Pisani, 646 F.2d 83, 85-89 (3d Cir.1981) (fashioning federal common law of veil piercing in action to recover Medicare overpayments). “[F]ederal law governs questions involving the rights of the United States arising under nationwide federal programs.” United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Juniper Development Group v. Kahn
See 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (f)(1) ("[T]he court may allocate response costs among liable parties using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate.”); see also Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 90 (3d Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc., (Two Cases) in Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc., in Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc.
See 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (f)(1) ("[T]he court may allocate response costs among liable parties using such equitable factors as the court determines are appropriate."); see also Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 90 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.
See, e.g., Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 89 (3d Cir.1988) (“agreements to indemnify or hold harmless [from CERCLA liabilities] are enforceable between the parties”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel
(2×)
See, e.g., Wells v. United States, 851 F.2d 1471, 1473 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 836 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); 5A C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.
See also Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 90 (3rd Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 837 , 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989); United States v. Kramer, 757 F.Supp. 397, 428 (D.N.J.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.
These and other statements in the legislative history do not suggest that the liability imposed under the Act was meant to be punitive, but that it was intended “to provide a mechanism for prompt recovery of monies expended” by the Government and “to induce such potentially liable persons to pursue appropriate environmental response actions voluntarily.” Id. at 33, U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1980, p. 6136; see also Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 91 (3d Cir.1988) (CERCLA views response liability as a remedial, rather than a punitive, measure), cert. denie…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Independent Federation of Flight Attendants
v.
Zipes
v.
Zipes
No. 88-608.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1989.
488 U.S. 1029
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.