green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.
But see, Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, 858 F.2d 775, 787-790 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); Hawley v. Hall, 131 F.R.D. 578 (D.Nev.1990). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
s long as a protective order remains in effect, the court that entered the order retains the power to modify it, even if the underlying suit has been dismissed
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Singleton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Singleton)
in support of this 'injunction,' the district court necessarily had the power to enforce the order, at any point while the order was in effect, including periods after judgment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fort Zumwalt School District v. Clynes
clearly, congress did not intend that a school system could discharge its duty under by providing a program that produces some minimal academic advancement, no matter how trivial.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wauchop v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
as a general proposition, pretrial discovery must take place in the public unless compelling reasons exist for denying the public access to the proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
M.S. v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
See Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171 , 179-180 (3d Cir. 1998), cert. denied 488 U.S. 1030 (1989); see also Carlisle Area School v. Scott P., 62 F.3d 520, 533-34 (3d Cir. 1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Massachusetts v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 783 (1st Cir.1988) (noting that “where intervention is available (i.e. civil eases), it is an effective mechanism for third-party claims of access to information generated through judicial proceedings”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dugan v. Wyvern Aviation Consulting Ltd. (In re Flighttime Corp.)
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 781 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); see also 3 Moore supra ¶ 15.10 at 15-107 (“[A]fter a judgment of dismissal plaintiff must move under Rules 59(e) or 60(b) to reopen the judgment.”); 6 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Isbell v. Travis Electric Co.
See Public Citizen v. Lagged Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 781 (1s t Cir.1988 ), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); see also 3 Moore supra ¶ 15 .10 at 15 -107 ("[After a judgm ent of dismissal plaintiff must move under Rules 59(e) or 60(b) to reopen the judgme nt."); 6 Cha rles A. W right & Arthu r R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Doe
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 786 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 (1989); see also Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 777-80 (3d Cir. 1994) (citing cases); Mokhiber v. Davis, 537 A.2d 1100, 1105 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
TH v. Board of Educ. of Palatine
Accord Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 183 (3rd Cir.1988) ("trivial educational advancement" is insufficient), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
2-J CORP. v. Tice
See King v. Hilton-Davis, 855 F.2d 1047 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 839 , 102 L.Ed.2d 971 (1989); Bailey Farms, Inc. v. NOR-AM Chem.
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1995
See Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Carlisle Area School v. Scott P. Ex Rel. Bess P.
See Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 *527 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Acevedo Villalobos v. Hon. Hernandez
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 ___ ______________ ____________________ F.2d 775, 781 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 _____ ______ (1989); see also 3 Moore supra 15.10 at 15-107 ("[A]fter a ___ ____ _____ judgment of dismissal plaintiff must move under Rules 59(e) or 60(b) to reopen the judgment."); 6 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Acevedo Villalobos v. Hon. Hernandez
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 781 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); see also 3 Moore supra ¶ 15.10 at 15-107 (“[A]fter a judgment of dismissal plaintiff must move under Rules 59(e) or 60(b) to reopen the judgment.”); 6 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R.
cited
Cited "see"
Urban v. King
See Pitts v. Turner and Boisseau, Chartered, 850 F.2d 650, 653 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nault's Automobile Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989) (discussing in detail the grounds for issuance and modification of a Rule 26 protective order).
cited
Cited "see"
Oberti Ex Rel. Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District
See Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 176 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); 20 U.S.C. § 1401 (a)(16).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1992
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 783-784 (1st Cir.1988) (Rule 24 is correct course for third parties to challenge protective orders), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); Meyer Goldberg, Inc. of Lorain v. Fisher Foods, 823 F.2d 159, 162 (6th Cir.1987) (recognizing 24(b) intervention as proper method for nonparty to seek protected materials); Martindell v. International Tel. & Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beckman Industries, Inc. v. International Insurance
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 783-784 (1st Cir.1988) (Rule 24 is correct course for third parties to challenge protective orders), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); Meyer Goldberg, Inc. of Lorain v. Fisher Foods, 823 F.2d 159, 162 (6th Cir.1987) (recogniz ing 24(b) intervention as proper method for nonparty to seek protected materials); Martindell v. International Tel. & Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Evans
See Pitts v. Turner and Boisseau Chartered, 850 F.2d 650 , 653 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); Wendt v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, No. 89-2463, slip op. at 6 (D.Kan.
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. Jennings
See, Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F. (2d) 775 (1st Cir. 1988) cert, denied 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S. Ct. 838 ,102 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bivona v. Trollio
See Kelsey v. Muskin, Inc., 848 F.2d 39, 40 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 971 (1989) (holding that the statutory language of § 2072(a) is conclusive in that “[a]n injured person may not recover under the [CPSA] unless his injury occurred ‘by reason of’ a rule violation”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neff v. Coleco Industries, Inc.
See Kelsey v. Muskin, Inc., 848 F.2d 39 (2d Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 971 (1989) (failure to warn was not proximate cause of accident); Caraballo v. United States, 830 F.2d 19 (2d Cir.1987) (failure to warn was not proximate cause of accident); Colosimo v. May Dept.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Independent School District No. 4 Of Bixby
Sec. 1415 (e)(2); see Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989). 2 This case was submitted to the district court on the administrative record, including a transcript of the administrative hearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 4 of Bixby
The legal standard to be used by the district court in considering each of these issues is set forth in the Act: “In any action brought under this paragraph the court shall receive the records of the administrative proceedings, shall hear additional evidence at the request of a party, and, basing its decision on the preponderance of the evidence, shall grant such relief as the court determines is appropriate.” 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (e)(2); see Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).…
cited
Cited "see"
Church of Scientology of Boston v. Internal Revenue Service
See Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 778 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational Industries, Inc
See Kelsey v Muskin, Inc, 848 F2d 39 (CA 2, 1988), cert den 488 US 1030 (1989), Caraballo v United States, 830 F2d 19 (CA 2, 1987), Colosimo v May Dep’t Store Co, 466 F2d 1234 (CA 3, 1972), Winant v Carefree Pools, 709 F Supp 57 (ED NY, 1989) , aff’d without opinion 891 F2d 278 (CA 2, 1989), Dowen v Hall, 191 Ill App 3d 903; 138 Ill Dec 933; 548 NE2d 346 (1989), Amatulli v Delhi Construction Corp, 156 AD2d 500 ; 548 NYS2d 774 (1989), Howard v Poseidon Pools, Inc, 72 NY2d 972 ; 530 NE2d 1280 (1988), Caris v Mele, 134 AD2d 475 ; 521 NYS2d 260 (1987), Belling v Haugh’s Pools, Ltd, 126 AD2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Falls Corporation v. Soni
Sept. 25, 2017) (quoting Kassim v. City of Schenectady, 221 F.R.D. 363, 365 (N.D.N.Y. 2003); see also Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, 858 F. 2d 775, 790 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S. Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 970 (1989) (“[Scheduling] orders and their enforcement are regarded as the essential mechanism for cases becoming trial-ready in an efficient, just, and certain manner.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marrone v. G & P CONSTRUCTION, INC.
See also King v. Hilton-Davis, 855 F. 2d 1047, 1050-51 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 839 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 971 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laflamme v. Carpenters Local 370 Pension plan
See, e.g., Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, 858 F.2d 775, 790 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989) (“[Scheduling] orders and their enforcement are regarded as the essential mechanism for cases becoming trial-ready in an efficient, just, and certain manner.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kassim v. City of Schenectady
See, e.g., Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, 858 F.2d 775, 790 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989) (“[Scheduling] orders and their enforcement are regarded as the essential mechanism for cases becoming trial-ready in an efficient, just, and certain manner.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Montour School District v. S.T.
See also Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171 (3d Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. Olympic Pipeline Co.
Ct., 187 F.3d 1096 , 1102 (9th Cir.1999) (acknowledging right of prejudgment access to civil court documents grounded in federal common law and FRCP 26(c)); see also Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 780-81 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989). [101] The question of whether court records can be sealed has been repeatedly addressed by our courts.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.
See, e.g., King v. Hilton-Davis, 855 F.2d 1047, 1051 (3d Cir.1988) (no recovery for damage caused by chemical to seed potatoes because plaintiffs purchased treated seed potatoes, not chemical), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 839 , 102 L.Ed.2d 971 (1989); American Home Assurance Co. v. Major Tool and Mach., Inc., 767 F.2d 446, 447-48 (8th Cir.1985) (turbine assembler could not recover in tort from manufacturer of defective component parts because damage from those defective parts to remainder of turbine was not damage to other property); Hadar v. Concordia Yacht Builders, 886 F.Supp. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D.B. v. Ocean Township Board of Education
See, e.g., Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171 (3d Cir.1988) (discussing plaintiffs procedural and substantive claims under IDEA), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Empire Blue Cross And Blue Shield v. Janet Greeson's A Place For Us, Inc.
See, e.g., Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 790 (1st Cir.1988) ("Control of pretrial discovery, including the entry or modification of a protective order, is a matter falling peculiarly within the discretion of the district court.") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); Wilk v. AMA, 635 F.2d 1295, 1299 (7th Cir.1981) (if the district court finds prejudice to the party opposing modification (as in this case), it then has "broad discretion" to decide whether to modify). 7 II.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Janet Greeson's A Place For Us, Inc.
See, e.g., Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 790 (1st Cir.1988) (“Control of pretrial discovery, including the entry or modification of a protective order, is a matter falling peculiarly within the discretion of the district court.”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989); Wilk v. AMA 635 F.2d 1295, 1299 (7th Cir.1981) (if the district court finds prejudice to the party opposing modification (as in this ease), it then has “broad discretion” to decide whether to modify).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ITT Electro-Optical Products Division of ITT Corp. v. Electronic Technology Corp.
Wright, supra § 2043 at 301-02; see also Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1, 7 (1st Cir.1986), and Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 789 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wilson County School Board
See also Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171, 176 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989).
Pitts
v.
Turner & Boisseau, Chartered
v.
Turner & Boisseau, Chartered
No. 88-823.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1989.
488 U.S. 1030
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.