green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
TOWN OF AMHERST v. ROCKINGHAM ESTATES, LLC
We therefore agree with plaintiff that the Planning Board may rescind its approval of the final plat, which was approved in error (see Matter of Reiss v Keator, 150 AD2d 939, 941-942 ; see generally Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 281-282 , rearg denied 71 NY2d 995 , cert denied 488 US 801 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Amherst v. Rockingham Estates, LLC
We therefore agree with plaintiff that the Planning Board may rescind its approval of the final plat, which was approved in error (see Matter of Reiss v Keator, 150 AD2d 939, 941-942 [1989]; see generally Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 281-282 [1988], rearg denied 71 NY2d 995 [1988], cert denied 488 US 801 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Amherst v. Rockingham Estates, LLC
We therefore agree with plaintiff that the Planning Board may rescind its approval of the final plat, which was approved in error (see Matter of Reiss v Keator, 150 AD2d 939, 941-942 [1989]; see generally Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 281-282 [1988], rearg denied 71 NY2d 995 [1988], cert denied 488 US 801 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schupak v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Marbletown
Commn., 2 NY3d 727, 729 [2004]), relief remains available “even after completion of the project” because “structures . . . most often can be destroyed” (Matter of Dreikausen v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Long Beach, supra at 172; see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 [1988], cert denied 488 US 801 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kiselgof v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Generally, “estoppel is not available against a governmental agency in the exercise of its governmental functions” (Matter of Daleview Nursing Home v Axelrod, 62 NY2d 30, 33 [1984]; see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 [1988], cert denied 488 US 801 [1988]; Scruggs-Leftwich v Rivercross Tenants’ Corp., 70 NY2d 849, 851-852 [1987]).
discussed
Cited "see"
F.A.S.A. Construction Corp. v. Village of Monroe
Generally, “estoppel is not available against a governmental agency in the exercise of its governmental functions” (Matter of Daleview Nursing Home v Axelrod, 62 NY2d 30, 33 [1984]; see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 [1988], cert denied 488 US 801 [1988]; Scruggs-Leftwich v Rivercross Tenants' Corp., 70 NY2d 849, 852 [1987]; Matter of City of New York v City Civ.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Town Board of Windham
Nor will estoppel be invoked where, as here, “reasonable diligence by a good-faith inquirer would have disclosed the existence of the statute” or where the Town’s correction of an enforcement error will result in a harsh result to petitioners (Waste Recovery Enters, v Town of Unadilla, supra at 769; see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 [1988], appeal dismissed, cert denied 488 US 801 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
County of Nassau v. State
Estoppel, however, is generally not available against a governmental agency engaged in the exercise of its governmental functions (Matter of Frye v Commissioner of Fin. of City of N.Y., 62 NY2d 841, 844 ; Slate v State of New York, 284 AD2d 767 ; see, Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274 , cert denied 488 US 801 ; cf., Market St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Celani v. Marconi
Upon reinspection, defendants again cited that noncompliance. “[I]t is well settled that an individual employee’s statements or actions will not bind a municipality to a course of conduct in violation of its own ordinances” (International Merchants v Village of Old Field, 203 AD2d 247, 248 ; see, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 , rearg denied 71 NY2d 995 , appeal dismissed and cert denied 488 US 801 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoiengs v. County of Adams
See, Boersma v. Karnes, 227 Neb. 329 , 417 N.W.2d 341 (1988), appeal dismissed 488 U.S. 801 , 109 S. Ct. 29 , 102 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Macias v. City of New York
Corp., 162 AD2d 492 ; see generally, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274 , cert denied 488 US 801 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Manning v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
Corp., 162 AD2d 492 ; see generally, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274 , cert denied 488 US 801 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Montipark Realty Corp. v. Village of Monticello
Ventures Corp. v Foster, 71 NY2d 359, 369 ; see, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 , appeal dismissed, cert denied 488 US 801 ; Matter of Daleview Nursing Home v Axelrod, 62 NY2d 30, 33 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delafield 246 Corp. v. City of New York
Finally, estoppel is not generally available against a government agency to prevent it from carrying out its statutory duties, especially when the duty involves taxation (Matter of Frye v Commissioner of Fin. of City of N.Y., 62 NY2d 841, 844 [1984]; see also Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282 [1988], cert denied 488 US 801 [1988] [government agency cannot he estopped from carrying out statutory duty even where there are harsh results]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brackenridge
v.
Ametek, Inc.
v.
Ametek, Inc.
No. 87-1783.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.