green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Concepts in Optics, Inc.
dissemination and public accessibility are the keys to the legal determination whether a prior art reference was 'published.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Stan L. Floyd, Herbert D. Muise and Mark A. Stanish
a statement in a patent that something is in the prior art is binding on the applicant and patentee for determinations of anticipation and obviousness.
discussed
Cited "see"
Suffolk Technologies, LLC v. Aol Inc.
“A given reference is ‘publicly accessible’ upon a satisfactory showing that such document has been disseminated or otherwise made available to the extent that persons interested and ordinarily skilled in the subject matter or art exercising reasonable diligence, can locate it.” Id. (quoting Bruckelmyer v. Ground Heaters, Inc., 445 F.3d 1374, 1378 (Fed.Cir.2006)); see In re Cronyn, 890 F.2d 1158, 1160 (Fed.Cir.1989) (“[Dissemination and public accessibility are the keys to the legal determination whether a prior art reference was ‘published.’ ” (quoting Constant v. Advanced Mic…
cited
Cited "see"
1500 Mineral Spring Associates, LP v. Gencarelli
See In re Chisum, 847 F.2d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Solomon
See In re Chisum, 68 B.R. 471 (9th Cir. BAP 1986), aff'd 847 F.2d 597 , certiorari denied 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 [“Bankruptcy court has inherent power to impose sanctions on parties and counsel who willfully abuse judicial process.” Chisum, Ibid at 473.] Regardless of Debtor’s good or bad faith in connection with the preparation of these totally inaccurate schedules, this Court believes that Creditors are entitled to have accurate bankruptcy schedules and full disclosure of Debtor’s actual financial condition.
cited
Cited "see"
Persyn v. United States
See Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1571-72 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Cub Cadet Corp. v. Rosage (In Re Rosage)
See In re Chisum, 847 F.2d 597, 599 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re VIII South Michigan Associates
Accord In re Chisum, 847 F.2d 597 , 599 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988); In re Leigh, 165 B.R. 203, 231 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1993). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.
See Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1571 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988). ("The [specification] text does not implicitly suggest that the words should be interpreted [as plaintiff suggests].”). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
General Electric Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
See Constant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1569 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Interpreting this single comment to require that the PB patent covers only multiple laser source applications would improperly “diminish or vary the limitations of the claims.” Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. Davis, 102 U.S. 222, 227 , 26 L.Ed. 149 (1880); see also Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1571 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988) (holding that it is improper to read limitations from the specifications into the claims). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie G. Harris v. Coweta County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Georgia, Larry T. Hammett, Sheriff of Coweta County
See also W.D.D., Inc. v. Thornbury Township, 850 F.2d 170, 171 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988) (no jurisdiction over appeal from denial of summary judgment where township raised no claim of immunity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldberg v. Town Of Rocky Hill
See, e.g., W.D.D., Inc. v. Thornbury Township, 839 F.2d 151 , 154 n. 3 (3d Cir.) ("[a]s a municipal corporation, the Township * * * cannot make a claim of immunity under the law governing § 1983 suits"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 170 (3d Cir.1988); Blackburn v. Snow, 771 F.2d 556 , 571 n. 13 (1st Cir.1985) ("[u]nlike individual defendants, local governmental entities may not interpose the defense of immunity [in a § 1983 action]"); Finkelstein v. Barthelemy, 678 F.Supp. 1255, 1261 (E.D.La.1988) ("[a]s to a defendan…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldberg v. Town of Rocky Hill
See, e.g., W.D.D., Inc. v. Thornbury Township, 839 F.2d 151 , 154 n. 3 (3d Cir.) (“[a]s a municipal corporation, the Township * * * cannot make a claim of immunity under the law governing § 1983 suits”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988), vacated on other grounds, 850 F.2d 170 (3d Cir.1988); Blackburn v. Snow, 771 F.2d 556 , 571 n. 13 (1st Cir.1985) (“[ujnlike individual defendants, local governmental entities may not interpose the defense of immunity [in a § 1983 action]”); Finkelstein v. Barthelemy, 678 F.Supp. 1255, 1261 (E.D.La.1988) (“[a]s to …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc.
See also Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1571 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988) (patentee may be his own lexicographer provided that the patent specification supports his asserted definition).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Earl
See e.g., In re Chisum, 847 F.2d 597, 600 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, sub nom, Mortgage Mart, Inc. v. Rechnitzer, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988) (multiple filings permissible because of changed circumstances).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Rifle Association of America
v.
Minnesota State Ethical Practices Board
v.
Minnesota State Ethical Practices Board
No. 88-300.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.