green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.9 score
“carlin iii”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dial Information Services Corporation Of New York v. Richard L. Thornburgh
carlin iii
cited
Cited "see"
Kyle Alexander Farrar v. State
See United States v. Bengivenga , 845 F.2d 593, 596 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 924 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Kyle Alexander Farrar v. State
See United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 596 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. State
See United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 596 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Hector Rodriguez v. State
See United States v. Bengivena , 845 F.2d 593, 596 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S. Ct. 306 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chalmers v. Tulon Co of Richmond
See EEOC v. Ithaca Indus., Inc., 849 F.2d 116, 118 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (definition of religion under Title VII requires employers to make reasonable accommoda- tions, short of undue hardship), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 924 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charita D. Chalmers v. Tulon Company of Richmond
(2×)
See EEOC v. Ithaca Indus., Inc., 849 F.2d 116, 118 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (definition of religion under Title VII requires employers to make reasonable accommodations, short of undue hardship), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Hector Rodriguez v. State
See United States v. Bengivena , 845 F.2d 593, 596 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S. Ct. 306 , 102 L.
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1992
See Corwin v. Marney, Orton Invs., 843 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988), citing Breen v. Centex Corp., 695 F.2d 907, 911 (5th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Topalian v. Ehrman
See Corwin v. Marney, Orton Invs., 843 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988), citing Breen v. Centex Corp., 695 F.2d 907, 911 (5th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gene E. Stone
Id. at 358 , 107 S.Ct. at 2880 ; accord United States v. Murphy, 836 F.2d 248, 250 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 307 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth J. Masat
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 675 , 105 S.Ct. 3375, 3380 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985), on remand, 798 F.2d 1297 (9th Cir.1986), later proceeding, 659 F.Supp. 223 (W.D.Wash.1987), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 837 F.2d 371 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 304 , 102 L.Ed.2d 323 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James E. Campbell
See United States v. Murphy, 836 F.2d 248 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy Lee Arlen
See United States v. Bradshaw, 840 F.2d 871 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988); United States v. Mitcheltree, 940 F.2d 1329 (10th Cir.1991); United States v. Cambra, 933 F.2d 752 (9th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haywood Williams, Jr.
Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 (1977); see United States v. Aguilar, 849 F.2d 92 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blair William Guthrie
See United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443 , 92 S.Ct. 589 , 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972); accord United States v. Bagley, 837 F.2d 371, 376 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 304 , 102 L.Ed.2d 323 (1988); United States v. Williams, 782 F.2d 1462, 1466 (9th Cir.1985); Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 674-75 (9th Cir.1980); Farrow v. United States, 580 F.2d 1339, 1344-45 (9th Cir.1978) (en banc).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl S. Granberry
See United States v. Murphy, 836 F.2d 248 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 307 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lewis
(2×)
Ed. 2d 137 (1988); see also United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 599 (5th Cir. 1988) (en banc) (“[W]here an officer asked a motorist to step out of his car and to perform a sobriety test, simply asking passengers to step off a bus and inquiring about ownership of luggage does not render a suspect in custody.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S. Ct. 306 , 102 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kanamu
See also U.S. v. Bagley, 837 F.2d 371, 376 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 304 , 102 L.Ed.2d 323 (1988); U.S. v. Behanna, 814 F.2d 1318, 1321 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
(2×)
Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 , 108 S.Ct. 1392 , 99 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998) ("[E]very reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality.") (quoting Hooper v. California, 155 U.S. 648, 657 , 15 S.Ct. 207 , 39 L.Ed. 297 (1895)); see also Carlin Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 837 F.2d 546 , 560-61 (2d Cir.1988) (finding that as "the presumption is in favor of severability," the court "dropped" the "invalid part" from an FCC regulation, i.e., the words "or indecent," because "the remainder of the statute is fully operative."), cert, denied 488 U.S. 924 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, Incorporated
Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806, 643 F.2d 445, 452 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1046 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981); Redmond, 574 F.2d at 901 ; see also EEOC v. Ithaca Indus., Inc., 849 F.2d 116, 118 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988); Anderson v. General Dynamics Convair Aerospace Div., 589 F.2d 397 , 401 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 2848 , 61 L.Ed.2d 290 (1979); Smith v. Pyro Mining Co., 827 F.2d 1081, 1085 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 1293 , 99 L.Ed.2d 503…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, Incorporated
Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806, 643 F.2d 445, 452 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1046 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981); Redmond, 574 F.2d at 901 ; see also EEOC v. Ithaca Indus., Inc., 849 F.2d 116, 118 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988); Anderson v. General Dynamics Convair Aerospace Div., 589 F.2d 397 , 401 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 921 , 99 S.Ct. 2848 , 61 L.Ed.2d 290 (1979); Smith v. Pyro Mining Co., 827 F.2d 1081, 1085 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 989 , 108 S.Ct. 1293 , 99 L.Ed.2d 503…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bretch
See also United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gonzalez
See, e.g., U.S. v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 597-600 (5th Cir.) (en banc ) (“a Fourth Amendment seizure does not necessarily render a person in custody for purposes of Miranda ") (holding admissible defendant’s statements made during Terry stop and prior to Miranda warnings), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988); U.S. v. Streifel, 781 F.2d 953, 957-62 (1st Cir.1986) ("As a general rule, Terry stops do not implicate the requirements of Miranda____”) ("That [defendants] were asked to turn their motors off and step out of their vehicles ... did not render them…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alioto
See also United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
54 Fair empl.prac.cas. 616, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,464 United States of America v. Johnnie F. Clark, United States of America v. Theresa Jeffery
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, exclusion of evidence is appealable only if “the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context.” Fed.R.Evid. 103(a); see also United States v. Bagley, 837 F.2d 371, 375 (9th Cir.) (“To preserve an issue for review requires an offer of proof and the making of a record.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 304 , 102 L.Ed.2d 323 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wenzel v. Patrick Petroleum Co.
See, e.g., Corwin v. Marney, Orton Investments, 843 F.2d 194, 198 (5th Cir.) (refusing to impute constructive knowledge of information found in state records for federal securities law purposes despite that state law imposes constructive knowledge), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988); Briskin v. Ernst & Ernst, 589 F.2d 1363, 1368 (9th Cir.1978) (refusing to decide as a matter of law that a reasonably prudent person would check SEC filings to verify the terms of a transaction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Doughty
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Martinez-Gallegos, 807 F.2d 868, 870 (9th Cir.1987); see also United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 601 (5th Cir.) (derivative evidence rule applies only to “actual constitutional violation” in a fifth amendment case), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bareno-Burgos
Indeed, no such rule could be assumed in light of United States v. Sokolow, supra, wherein the Supreme Court upheld as a Terry stop a DEA agent “grab[bing]” a defendant by the arm and ultimately escorting him to an office for further inquiry. 109 S.Ct. at 1584 ; see also United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F.2d 593, 599-600 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (moving suspect from bus to trailer for questioning at which bus driver was present does not amount to a formal arrest), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 306 , 102 L.Ed.2d 325 (1988).
Sosa
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-7347.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1988.
488 U.S. 924
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.