green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1990 ·
…neither the presence of the defendant in the state, nor actual contract formation need take place in the forum state for defendant to do business in that state.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…when the problem consists in keeping silence while the primary violator carries out the fraud, the plaintiff must show that the silent person had a legal duty to speak.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re River Village Associates
the determination of what is adequate information is subjective and made on a ease by case basis. this determination is largely within the discretion of the bankruptcy court.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pippenger v. McQuik's Oilube, Inc.
(2×)
when the problem consists in keeping silence while the primary violator carries out the fraud, the plaintiff must show that the silent person had a legal duty to speak.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eulala Shute and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines
neither the presence of the defendant in the state, nor actual contract formation need take place in the forum state for defendant to do business in that state.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eulala Shute, and Russel Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines
neither the presence of the defendant in the state, nor actual contract formation need take place in the forum state for defendant to do business in that state.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander-Schauss v. Lew
(2×)
See Lanier v. American Bd. of Endodontics, 843 F.2d 901, 907 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simmang v. Texas Board of Law Examiners
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 193 n. 3 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Phoenix Petroleum Co.
A disclosure statement may only be approved after notice and hearing, Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3017(a), and then only if it includes “adequate information.” 11 U.S.C. § 1125 (b); accord, e.g., Matter of Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142, 1157 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re 2TheMart. Com, Inc. Securities Litigation
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 203-204 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crowell v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Services, Co.
See Stephenson v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 839 F.2d 1095, 1101 (5th Cir.1988), cert, denied 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 328 (1988); Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc., 761 F.2d 162, 167 (4th Cir.1985) (noting “the absence of any federal court decision holding that securities transactions are subject to § 5(a)(1) of the FTC Act”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haney v. Delta Petroleum Co., Inc.
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, Middle South Utilities v. Isquith, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
John P. Ladika v. James C. Luker
See In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S. Ct. 311 (1988); In re Carter, 84 B.R. 744 (D.
cited
Cited "see"
Phyllis MERRIWEATHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF INDIANA, INC. Defendant-Appellant
See Kurowski v. Krajewski, 848 F.2d 767, 776 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 309 , 102 L.Ed.2d 328 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salei v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.
(2×)
See Lanier v. American Bd. of Endodontics, 843 F.2d 901, 909 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Best Products Co., Inc.
See Matter of Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142, 1156-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Best Products Co. (In re Best Products Co.)
See Matter of Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142, 1156-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stavroff v. Meyo
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utils., Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 204 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Floors Unlimited, Inc., D/B/A First Floors v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 198-99 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 193 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Endo v. Albertine
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 205 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dewayne Johnson v. Matthew Jochums
See Kurowski v. Krajewski, 848 F.2d 767, 773 (7th Cir.) (holding that a "public official may raise questions of immunity on appeal from a final judgment, even though he bypassed an opportunity to take an interlocutory appeal"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 (1988); see also Weir v. Propst, 915 F.2d 283, 286 (7th Cir.1990) (same). 18 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. * The Honorable John D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Closs v. Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District
(2×)
Id. at 1473, 1480 ; see Isquith v. Middle S. Util., Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 194 (5th Cir.) (recognizing that verified pleadings may be treated as affidavits if the facts asserted are within the pleader’s personal knowledge and are otherwise admissible), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988). 11 The Fifth Circuit’s decision is based in part on the Supreme Court’s holding that, until resolution of the applicability of the immunity defense, discovery should not be allowed.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Colonial Ltd. Partnership Litigation
(2×)
See LHLC Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., 842 F.2d 928, 932-33 (7th Cir.) (citing Barker v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, 797 F.2d 490, 496-97 (7th Cir.1986)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pasternak v. Colonial Equities Corp.
(2×)
See LHLC Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., 842 F.2d 928, 932-33 (7th Cir.) (citing Barker v. Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, 797 F.2d 490, 496-97 (7th Cir.1986)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Todd Kerry Grayson v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden
See Walker v. Endell, 850 F.2d 470, 477 (9th Cir.) (due process "prohibits a trial judge from enhancing a sentence ... based on a conviction infected by constitutional error"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 (1988). 15 Grayson also claims that the trial court erroneously allowed him to be impeached with this conviction.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re MCorp Financial, Inc.
See In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 , 1159 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Allen Silva, AKA Jesse Vega, United States of America v. Kimbel Le Maux, United States of America v. Paul Inrig
See Walker v. Endell, 850 F.2d 470, 476-77 (9th Cir.1987), certs. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 488 U.S. 981 (1988); United States v. Lowe, 654 F.2d 562, 565-66 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Morgan, 595 F.2d 1134, 1135-37 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 205 n. 13 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988) (continuing duty to disclose obtains when “subsequent events” make earlier statements inaccurate, or when those statements are “later discovered” to have been false or misleading from the outset).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,451 Jerry Krim, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Banctexas Group, Inc., Banctexas Group, Inc.
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 207-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krim v. BancTexas Group, Inc.
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186, 207-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert B. Newman v. George Voinovich
(2×)
See Kurowski v. Krajewski, 848 F.2d 767, 770-71 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 309 , 102 L.Ed.2d 328 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Schepps Food Stores, Inc.
See In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 , 1155 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988); In re MCorp Fin., Inc., 139 B.R. 820, 822 (S.D.Tex.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine
(2×)
See, Lanier v. American Board of Endodontics, 843 F.2d 901 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988) (contacts with plaintiff relating entirely to plaintiffs request for certification as a Dip-lómate of the American Board of Endodon-tics held to be the transaction of business for purposes of exercising jurisdiction over the defendant Board).
discussed
Cited "see"
Luce v. First Equipment Leasing Corp. (In Re Luce)
See Texas Extrusion Corp. v. Palmer, Palmer & Coffee (In re Texas Extrusion Corp.), 836 F.2d 217, 220 (5th Cir.), order aff'd, 844 F.2d 1142 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 *1285 (1988); Cities Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
26 Collier bankr.cas.2d 990, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,471 in the Matter Of: Billye M. Luce, D/B/A L & L International, L & L Leasing, and L & L International Enterprises, Debtor. Billye M. Luce, D/B/A L & L International, L & L Leasing and L & L International Enterprises, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. First Equipment Leasing Corporation, Appellee-Cross-Appellant. In the Matter Of: Jack M. Luce and Billye M. Luce, D/B/A L & L International and L & L Leasing, Debtors. Billye M. Luce, D/B/A L & L International and L & L Leasing, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Westinghouse Credit Corporation, Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See Texas Extrusion Corp. v. Palmer, Palmer & Coffee (In re Texas Extrusion Corp.), 836 F.2d 217, 220 (5th Cir.), order aff'd, 844 F.2d 1142 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988); Cities Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Luce v. First Equipment Leasing Corp.
See Texas Extrusion Corp. v. Palmer, Palmer & Coffee (In re Texas Extrusion Corp.), 836 F.2d 217, 220 (5th Cir.), order aff'd, 844 F.2d 1142 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988); Cities Serv.
discussed
Cited "see"
David Farlow v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
(2×)
See Latigo Ventures v. Laventhol & Horwath, 876 F.2d 1322, 1326 (7th Cir.1989) where the audit report was issued two months after plaintiffs had made their investment, and LHLC Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., 842 F.2d 928 (7th Cir.1988), cert. den. 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 , where the accountant’s letter, containing alleged misstatements concerning the value of inventory, was not received by the buyer until after the sale closed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Industrion, Inc. v. Hialeah Industries, Inc.
See In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 , 1158 (5th Cir.) (court order approving settlement reviewed under abuse of discretion standard), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherrill K. Duncan and Dora Mae Duncan v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis
See In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 , 1153 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988); Hamilton v. Smith, 808 F.2d 36, 37 (10th Cir.1986); Knodle v. Jeffrey, 189 Ill.App.3d 877 , 137 Ill.Dec. 256, 260 , 545 N.E.2d 1017, 1021 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lynn Sinay, David Rosenberg (90-4075) and Aline Halye (91-3051) v. The Lamson & Sessions Company Russell Every John Schulze and Gene Budd
(2×)
See Isquith v. Middle South Utils., Inc., 847 F.2d 186 , 204 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
La Preferida, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. De C v. a Mexican Corporation
(2×)
Id.; see LHLC Corp. v. Gluett, Peabody & Co., 842 F.2d 928, 935-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronit Inc. v. Block Shim Development Co.-Irving (In Re Block Shim Development Co.-Irving)
In re Distrigas Corp., 66 B.R. 382, 384 (Bankr.D.Mass.1986); see In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 , 1159 n. 23 (5th Cir.) (unsecured creditors who did not receive the full value of their claims under reorganization plan were therefore impaired), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalton v. Alston & Bird
(2×)
See LHLC Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co., 842 F.2d 928 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1989) (plaintiff must show both loss causation and transaction causation; loss causation means the investor would not have suffered a loss if the facts were as he believed them to be). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc.
II, 994 F.2d 1160 , 1167 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993) (“ § 1129(a)(7) requires that each holder of a claim in a class either accept the plan or receive at least as much as it would receive in a chapter 7 liquidation.”); In re MCorp Fin., Inc., 137 B.R. 219, 228 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1992); see also In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 , 1159 n. 23 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988) (indicating that when impaired unsecured creditors vote against the plan, the bankruptcy court is required to d…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barland v. Eau Claire County
See, e.g., Kurowski v. Krajewski, 848 F.2d 767 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 (1988), Rosenbarger v. Shipman, 857 F. Supp. 1282 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine
(2×)
See also Lanier v. American *262 Board of Endodontics, 843 F.2d 901 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988) (contacts .with plaintiff relating entirely to plaintiffs request for certification as a Diplómate of the American Board of Endodontics held to be the transaction of business for purposes of exercising jurisdiction over the defendant board).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olesen v. Class
Similarly, the procedural default is not “adequate” if the state courts themselves bypass the petitioner’s default and consider his/her claims on the merits, see e.g., Antwine v. Delo, 54 F.3d 1357, 1361 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 753 , 133 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996); Dolny v. Erickson, 32 F.3d 381, 383-85 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995); Bannister v. Armontrout, 4 F.3d 1434, 1441 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994); Evans v. Dowd, 932 F.2d 739, 741 (8th Cir.), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Best Products Co., Inc.
See, e.g., In re Texas Extrusion Corp., 68 B.R. 712, 719 (N.D.Tex.1986), aff'd, 844 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 311 , 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988) (Court did not err in determining at confirmation that the debtor’s lawsuit had a negligible settlement value for best interest purposes under 1129(a)(7)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Compaq Securities Litigation
(2×)
See also Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc., 847 F.2d 186, 203-06 (5th Cir.1988) cert. denied 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988) (discussing when projections can be actionable); Wielgos, 892 F.2d at 512-16 (same); Dennis, supra, note 8 (examining development and utility of imposing liability for misleading projections).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bacik v. Peek
(2×)
See also Lanier v. American Bd. of Endodontics, 843 F.2d 901, 908-909 (6th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 310 , 102 L.Ed.2d 329 (1988) (in discrimination suit, rejecting defendant’s contention that because discriminatory decision was made outside forum state, the cause of action did not arise from defendant’s in state activities; held: “arising out of’ requirement satisfied if the cause of action was “made possible by” or “lies in the wake of’ the defendant’s state contacts) The defendant here negotiated its relationship in Ohio, with Ohio residents, and r…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brewer v. Purvis
See, e.g., Lagos v. Modesto City Schools Dist., 843 F.2d 347 (9th Cir.), cert. *1573 denied, 488 U.S. 926 , 109 S.Ct. 309 , 102 L.Ed.2d 328 (1988); Smith v. Bd. of Educ., 708 F.2d 258, 262 (7th Cir.1983); Jett v. Dallas Indep.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Middle South Utilities, Inc.
v.
Isquith
v.
Isquith
No. 88-408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1988.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.