green
Positive treatment
9.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Williams v. State
But see United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989) (holding that it did not violate the confrontation clause of the United States constitution to convict defendant for conspiracy to distribute controlled substance based upon a lab report admitted under the federal business records exception rule because this exception was "firmly rooted").
cited
Cited "see"
Amanda Marie Massimo v. State
See United States v. Baker , 855 F.2d 1353, 1359 (8 th Cir. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1069 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Massimo v. State
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Amanda Marie Massimo v. State
See United States v. Baker , 855 F.2d 1353, 1359 (8 th Cir. 1988), cert. denied , 490 U.S. 1069 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Jerome Riley
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 (1989) (standard of review).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Jerome Riley
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989) (standard of review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Lamont Evans v. Kelly Lock, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
See Lam v. Iowa, 860 F.2d 873, 876 (8th Cir.1988) (citing Chapman, 386 U.S. at 23-24 , 87 S.Ct. 824 ), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 637 (1989). “[T]his impermissible influence might appear in either of two forms: the evidence might aid the state in proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, or it might unfairly influence or prejudice the jury.” Id.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Evans v. Kelly Lock
See Lam v. Iowa, 860 F.2d 873, 876 (8th Cir. 1988) (citing Chapman, 386 U.S. at 23-24 ), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 (1989). "[T]his impermissible influence might appear in either of two forms: the evidence might aid the state in proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, or it might unfairly influence or prejudice the jury." Id.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Franklin Lyton
See United States v. Portwood, 857 F.2d 1221, 1222 (8th Cir.1988) (passenger may contest legality of stop), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2073 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Lyton
See United States v. Portman, 857 F.2d 1221, 1222 (8th Cir. 1988) (passenger may contest legality of stop), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William King, Jr.
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1362 (8th Cir.1988) (no impermissible shifting of burden of proof where prosecutor’s arguments were a fair comment on the evidence, the jury was instructed that counsel’s statements were not evidence, and the burden of proof remained with the government), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Minner v. Dareld Kerby
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989) (police laboratory reports on controlled substances fit business records exception).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Duncan
See United States v. Portwood, 857 F.2d 1221, 1222 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2073 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth D. Lucht, United States of America v. Gary D. Apker, United States of America v. Cheryl M. Morford, United States of America v. Lovella Mauseth, United States of America v. Sandra A. Volkir, United States of America v. Lamont D. Kress, United States of America v. Rodney S. Rumsey, United States of America v. Timothy S. Egan, United States of America v. Dale Ray Haley, Also Known as Corky Haley, United States of America v. Mary Lee, Also Known as Mary Spethman, United States of America v. Robert T. Farrell
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1357 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lucht
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1357 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)
(2×)
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1358 (8th Cir.1988) (evidence of defendant’s arrest for possession of a pistol and drugs admissible as evidence of the conspiracy), cer t. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sharon A. Aldridge
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1362 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale Eldridge, Also Known as Dale Smith, United States of America v. John David Fuget, Also Known as Poncho Proffer
See, *948 e.g., United States v. Portwood, 857 F.2d 1221, 1223 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2073 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wali Muhammed, Also Known as Willie Johnson, Also Known as Clyde M. Adams, III
See United States v. Portwood, 857 F.2d 1221, 1223 (8th Cir. 1988) (issue of pretext is factual question reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Edward Watts, United States of America v. David Henry Ritcherson, United States of America v. Mary Catherine Ritcherson F/k/a Mary Catherine Luter
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1357-58 (8th Cir.1988) (harmless error where jury could easily separate and apply the evidence to the proper defendants, other defendants not implicated, and evidence connected defendants to the conspiracy), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Watts
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1357-58 (8th Cir.1988) (harmless error where jury could easily separate and apply the evidence to the proper defendants, other defendants not implicated, and evidence connected defendants to the conspiracy), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
David A. Carlson v. State of Minnesota
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1362 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harper v. People
(2×)
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1361 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casey Quesada
See United States v. Phillips, 869 F.2d 1361, 1364 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan S. Agnew
See United States v. Phillips, 869 F.2d 1361, 1368-69 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2074 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Barrow
(2×)
See United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1362 (8th Cir. 1988) (prosecutor's comment that nothing in record supported defendant's testimony was a permissible comment on the witness's testimony), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 (1989); State v. Sinclair,_Conn. App. —, 569 A.2d 551, 555 (1990) (prosecutor entitled to comment on defendant's failure to support his own factual theories); State v. Howard, 320 N.C. 718 , 360 S.E.2d 790, 796 (1987) (permissible for prosecutor to comment on defendant's failure to produce exculpatory or corroborative evidence); Commonwealth v. Yarris, 519 Pa. 571 , 549 A…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rady I. Sdoulam, Also Known as Rady I. Sduolam, Also Known as Roddy Ibrahim, Also Known as Rady A. Sdoulam
Moreover, a defendant “does not have to be aware of the existence of all other conspirators or all the details of the conspiracy, as long as the evidence shows s/he made a knowing act in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Watts, 950 F.2d at 512 ; see also, United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1357 (8th Cir.1988) (holding that the defendant “did *992 not have to be personally acquainted” with the other defendants in order to participate in the conspiracy), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sutherland
See, e.g., United States v. Roulette, 75 F.3d 418, 422 (8th Cir.) (“The admission of such ... reports under the business records exception provides such a firmly rooted exception.” (citing United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1359 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989))), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 147 , 136 L.Ed.2d 93 (1996); Comment, Hearsay, The Confrontation Guarantee and Related Problems, 30 La.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Custody of S.E.G.
(2×)
BIA Guidelines, Introduction, 44 Fed.Reg. 67,583, 67,584 (1979); see also In re Adoption of T.R.M., 525 N.E.2d 298, 307 (Ind. 1988) ("guidelines are helpful but neither controlling nor binding upon state proceedings"), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989). [3] In this case the biological parents did not express a preference and thus this factor was not relevant to the trial court's decision.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey Wiley, United States of America v. Curtis Holub
See, e.g., United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1361 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989); United States v. Hendrix, 549 F.2d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 818 , 98 S.Ct. 58 , 54 L.Ed.2d 74 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard John Lafuente, Also Known as Ricky Lafuente
See, e.g., Carlson v. State, 945 F.2d 1026, 1029 (8th Cir.1991) (citing United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1363 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. United States
See also, under pre-Harris analysis, United States v. Patino, 830 F.2d 1413, 1418 (7th Cir.1987) (first confession proximate to unconstitutional search suppressed), after remand, 862 F.2d 128, 131-33 (7th Cir.1988) (second confession six days after illegal search not connected to the search), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 637 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent G. Smith
Compare United States v. Oates, 560 F.2d 45, 63-84 (2d Cir.1977) (drug analysis by government chemist held inadmissible hearsay not subject to business records exception) with United States v. Baker, 855 F.2d 1353, 1359-60 (8th Cir.1988) (“When made on a routine basis, laboratory analyses of controlled substances are admissible as business records under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6)’’) (citing United States v. Scholle, 553 F.2d 1109 , 1124 & n. 4 (8th Cir.1977)), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2072 , 104 L.Ed.2d 636 (1989), and United States v. Ware, 247 F.2d 698, 699 (7th Cir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Poole, Sr.
See, e.g., United States v. Phillips, 869 F.2d 1361, 1369 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1069 , 109 S.Ct. 2074 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989); United States v. Smith, 806 F.2d 971, 974 (10th Cir.1986); Tafoya v. United States, 386 F.2d 537, 539 (10th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1034 , 88 S.Ct. 1433 , 20 L.Ed.2d 294 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fermin
v.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
v.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
No. 88-6533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1989.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.