green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…under the sentencing guidelines, the amount of the drug being negotiated, even in an uncompleted distribution, shall be used to calculate the total amount in order to determine the base level.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)
(2×)
under the sentencing guidelines, the amount of the drug being negotiated, even in an uncompleted distribution, shall be used to calculate the total amount in order to determine the base level.
discussed
Cited "see"
People Ex Rel. Ls
See Scott v. Department of Social Servs., 76 Md.App. 357 , 545 A.2d 81, 90 (1988) ("child welfare seems to be a particularly appealing subject for periodic redetermination because children can be quickly and irretrievably scarred by negative circumstances"), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3226 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
People ex rel. L.S.
See Scott v. Department of Social Servs., 76 Md.App. 357 , 545 A.2d 81, 90 (1988) (“child welfare seems to be a particularly appealing subject for periodic redetermination because children can be quickly and irretrievably scarred by negative circumstances”), cer t. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3226 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richman v. FWB Bank
Esslinger v. Baltimore City, 95 Md.App. 607, 627 , 622 A.2d 774 , cert. denied, 331 Md. 479 , 628 A.2d 1066 (1993); see Scott v. Prince George’s County Dep’t of Social Servs., 76 Md.App. 357, 374 , 545 A.2d 81 , cert. denied, 314 Md. 193 , 550 A.2d 381 (1988), and cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3226 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Curtis v. School Committee
See United States v. Means, 858 F.2d 404, 406 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard Martin (94-3236) Terrone Dwayne Reavish (94-3237) Larry Traylor (94-3238) Kevin Israel (94-3351)
See United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 48 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Aetna Casualty v. Arsenal Auto Repairs
See United States v. Rivera- Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. P & B Autobody, Arsenal Auto Repairs, Inc., Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. Rodco Autobody, Betty Arhaggelidis, Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. P & B Autobody, Betty Arhaggelidis
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989). 15 One of the body shops, Rodco/P & B Autobody, was owned and operated by defendant Petros Arhaggelidis, who has not appealed the judgment against him.
cited
Cited "see"
Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. P & B Autobody
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Aetna Casualty v. Arsenal Auto Repairs
See United States v. Rivera- Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ovalle Marquez
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guyon
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 ___ _____________ _______________ F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989). ____________ Guyon applied for a series of student loans from the Bank of Boston, called Alliance loans, listing his own name as the student applicant.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Guyon
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State in Interest of JJT
See Scott v. Department of Social Servs., 76 Md.App. 357 , 545 A.2d 81, 90 (1988) ("child welfare seems to be a particularly appealing subject for periodic redetermination because children can be quickly and irretrievably scarred by negative circumstances"), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3226 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. J.J.T.
See Scott v. Department of Social Servs., 76 Md.App. 357 , 545 A.2d 81, 90 (1988) (“child welfare seems to be a particularly appealing subject for periodic redeter-mination because children can be quickly and irretrievably scarred by negative circumstances”), cer t. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3226 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James F. Melvin, United States v. Michael C. Habicht, United States v. Patrick J. Nee, United States v. Robert Emmett Joyce, United States v. James M. Murphy, United States v. Michael C. Habicht, United States v. Robert Emmett Joyce, United States v. James F. Melvin, United States v. James M. Murphy, Jr., United States v. Patrick J. Nee, United States v. Michael O. McNaught United States v. Michael O. McNaught
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin
See United States v. RiveraSantiago, 872 F.2d 1073 , 1078-79 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See United ___ ______ States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073 , 1079 (1st Cir.), cert. ______ _______________ _____ denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989); United States v. Baines, 812 F.2d ______ _____________ ______ 41, 42 (1st.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Welch
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1079 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989); United States v. Baines, 812 F.2d 41, 42 (1st Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zuleta
See United States v. Matovsky United States v. Perez , 871 F.2d 45, 48 (6th Cir.), cert. denied , 492 U.S. 910 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dino Howard, (92-1566/1567), Frank Bufkin, (92-1608), Marcus David Cerna, (92-1675), and Donnie Riggs, (92-1679)
See United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47-48 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel J. Kaylor
See United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989). 5 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanke v. Hanke
See Scott v. Prince George’s County Dept. of Social Services, 76 Md.App. 357, 382-83 , 545 A.2d 81 , cert. denied, 314 Md. 193 , 550 A.2d 381 , cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3226 , *72 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Henry Castro-Poupart v. United States
See United States v. Rivera Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073 , cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989). 1 3 Thereafter Castro filed a motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. St. Vincent De Paul Society
See United States Marshals Service v. Means, 741 F.2d 1053, 1057 (8th Cir.1984), rev’d on other grounds, 858 F.2d 404 (8th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989); Hubbard, 698 F.2d at 288-89 ; Badman v. Stark, 139 F.R.D. 601, 606 (M.D.Pa.1991); Newson v. Harrison, 687 F.Supp. 360, 361-62 (W.D.Tenn.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Hill
See United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989) (clearly erroneous standard applicable to district court’s application of guidelines).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tracy Sewell
See United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47-48 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989). 5 In light of the testimony presented at the sentencing proceeding, the district court's finding that the quantity of drugs involved in the February 1, 1991 transaction was part of the conspiracy is not clearly erroneous.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shmuel David, United States of America v. Jaime Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Amparo Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Yehuda Yarden
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1079 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 , --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 105 , 107 L.Ed.2d 68 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Octavio Font-Ramirez
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1088 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989); Porcaro v. United States, 784 F.2d 38, 44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 916 , 107 S.Ct. 320 , 93 L.Ed.2d 293 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Neal K. Maddox
See United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David
See United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1079 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 , — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 105 , 107 L.Ed.2d 68 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Munoz Franco
See also United States v. Garcia-Rosa, 876 F.2d 209, 232 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989) (government must know testimony is false); United States v. Bucci, 839 F.2d 825, 831 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 844 , 109 S.Ct. 117 , 102 L.Ed.2d 91 (1988) (prosecutor is not normally under duty to disclose exculpatory evidence to grand jury, nor obliged to impeach its own witnesses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Coleman
See also United States v. Garcia-Rosa, 876 F.2d 209, 232 (1st Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989) (government must know testimony is false); United States v. Bucci, 839 F.2d 825, 831 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 844 , 109 S.Ct. 117 , 102 L.Ed.2d 91 (1988) (prosecutor is not normally under duty to disclose exculpatory evidence to grand jury, nor obliged to impeach its own witnesses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Houlihan
See, e.g., United States v. Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073 , ___ ____ ______________ ________ 1079 (1st Cir.) (explaining that proof of a charged conspiracy requires, inter alia, proof of intent to commit the substantive _____ ____ offense), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 & 493 U.S. 832 (1989); _____ ______ United States v. Loder, 23 F.3d 586, 591 (1st Cir. 1994) (stating _____________ _____ that an aider and abettor must "consciously share[] the specific criminal intent of the principals"); 18 U.S.C. 1958 (specifically requiring proof that the defendant acted with "intent that a murder be committed").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Houlihan
See, e.g., United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1079 (1st Cir.) (explaining that proof of a charged conspiracy requires, inter alia, proof of intent to commit the substantive offense), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 & 493 U.S. 832 , 110 S.Ct. 105 , 107 L.Ed.2d 68 (1989); United States v. Loder, 23 F.3d 586, 591 (1st Cir.1994) (stating that an aider and abettor must “consciously share[ ] the specific criminal intent of the principals”); 18 U.S.C. § 1958 (specifically requiring proof that the defendant acted with “intent that a murder be committe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America (93-5156) v. Jeffrey Otis Peters (93-5153) and Marisha Lynn Winton (93-5154)
Given the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses, we are also required to “give due deference to the district court’s application of the guidelines to the facts.” 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e); see also United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.) (applying Section 3742), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Michael Apelt
See, e.g., United States v. Halliburton, 870 F.2d 557, 560-61 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989); United States v. Figueroa-Espinoza, 454 F.2d 590 (9th Cir.1972); United States v. Ware, 897 F.2d 1538, 1541-42 (10th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 496 U.S. 930 , 110 S.Ct. 2629 , 110 L.Ed.2d 649 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerry E. Blanchard
See also United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 48 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth O. Nichols
(2×)
The commentary to section 2D1.4, however, makes clear that an amount involved in an earlier transaction should be counted unless "the defendant did not intend to produce and was not reasonably capable of producing the negotiated amount." U.S.S.G. § 2D1.4, comment. (n. 1) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Gonzales, 929 F.2d 213, 216 (6th Cir.1991) (under section 2D1.4, " 'the amount of the drug being negotiated, even in an uncompleted distribution, shall be used to calculate the total amount in order to determine the base level' ") (quoting United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 48 (6t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas D. Vayko
We review a district court's findings of fact underlying the application of a guideline provision for clear error. 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e); see also United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47-48 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Julio Alberto Tejada, Mancebo, United States of America v. Winston Cabrera
Application Note 1 to § 2D1.4 further explains that “[i]f the defendant is convicted of an offense involving negotiation to traffic in a controlled substance, the weight under negotiation in an uncompleted distribution shall be used to calculate the applicable amount.” Addressing this same issue, the Ninth Circuit, holding that the negotiated amount defined the scope of a conspiracy, stressed that “[t]he fact that a little less is distributed does not affect the computation.” United States v. Alvarez-Cardenas, 902 F.2d 734, 736 (9th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Al Walter Bolden
See also United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 47 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989). 18 In this case, the district court held that the four-point enhancement of section 3B1.1 of the 1989 federal sentencing guidelines applied to defendant's guideline calculation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel Marquez
Compare, e.g., United States v. Rafferty, 911 F.2d 227, 282 (9th Cir.1990) (“The guidelines require the court to impose a fine unless the defendant establishes an inability to pay.”), and United States v. Perez, 871 F.2d 45, 48 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 576 (1989), with United States v. Walker, 900 F.2d 1201, 1206 (8th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (“When imposing any fine, the district court must consider the defendant’s ability to pay, in light of his earning capacity, and the burden the fine places on the defendant.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockhart v. Kenops
Lyng, 108 S.Ct. at 1325 ; see also United States v. Means, 858 F.2d 404, 407 (8th Cir.1988) (listing cases refusing to overturn governmental land management decisions challenged by Indians on free exercise grounds), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockhart v. Kenops
Lyng, 108 S.Ct. at 1325 ; see also United States v. Means, 858 F.2d 404, 407 (8th Cir.1988) (listing cases refusing to overturn governmental land management decisions challenged by Indians on free exercise grounds), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3227 , 106 L.Ed.2d 575 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harrison
v.
Bonner
v.
Bonner
No. 88-7129.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.