green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2005 ·
…here the police entry was into a common hallway, an area where there is no legitimate expectation of privacy ... even though the area was guarded by a locked door.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Logan v. Commonwealth
(2×)
here the police entry was into a common hallway, an area where there is no legitimate expectation of privacy ... even though the area was guarded by a locked door.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae Scurlock
See United States v. Maholias, 985 F.2d 869, 874 (7th Cir.1993) (citing United States v. Johnston, 876 F.2d 589, 593 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheridan Square Partnership v. United States
See Coleman v. Lyng, 864 F.2d 604, 611 (8th Cir.1988) ("Congress ... can change the statutory rights of litigants, even where this change may retroactively eliminate an initially meritorious claim, except where the new statute itself is for some reason unconstitutional."), cert. denied sub nom., 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989). 5 Recognizing the possibility that Sec. 801(a)(1) might preclude a direct attack upon HUD's actions, Sheridan Square alternatively attacks the statute itself on both procedural and substantive due process grounds.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheridan Square Partnership v. United States
See Coleman v. Lyng, 864 F.2d 604, 611 (8th Cir.1988) (“Congress ... can change the statutory rights of litigants, even where this change may retroactively eliminate an initially meritorious claim, except where the new statute itself is for some reason unconstitutional.”), cert. denied sub nom., 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McCarthy
See United States v. Barrios-Moriera, 872 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.) (no expectation of privacy in common hallway of apartment complex even though front door was locked), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack D. Brocksmith
See United States v. Johnston, 876 F.2d 589, 593 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Acosta
See United States v. Barrios-Moriera, 872 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.) (officers’ entry into common hallway of apartment building behind defendant-tenant who unlocked the door was constitutionally permissible), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989), abrogated on other grounds, Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 , 110 S.Ct. 2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990); Reardon v. Wroan, 811 F.2d 1025 , 1027 n. 2 (7th Cir.1987) (holding that persons in hallways of fraternity house, unlike apartment buildings, are constitutionally protected because of greater expectation of privacy).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Acosta A/K/A \Jose Diaz\"
See United States v. Barrios-Moriera, 872 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.) (officers' entry into common hallway of apartment building behind defendant-tenant who unlocked the door was constitutionally permissible), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989), abrogated on other grounds, Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 , 110 S.Ct. 2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990); Reardon v. Wroan, 811 F.2d 1025 , 1027 n. 2 (7th Cir.1987) (holding that persons in hallways of fraternity house, unlike apartment buildings, are constitutionally protected because of greater expectation of privacy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis \Toby\" Tyler v. City of Manhattan
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Local 30, United State, Tile & Composition Roofers, 871 F.2d 401 , 403 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 363 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James T. Anderson, Phillip Cordova, and Jon Gerald Salinas
See also United States v. Johnston, 876 F.2d 589, 592 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989); United States v. Williams, 633 F.2d 742, 745 (8th Cir.1980); and United States v. Vasey, 834 F.2d 782, 788 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James E. Clark
See also United States v. Alexander, 849 F.2d 1293, 1301 (10th Cir.1988) (admission or exclusion of evidence) 2 Defendant cites United States v. Barrios-Moriera, 872 F.2d 12, 16 (2d Cir.) ("lawful entry, inadvertent discovery, and probable cause" must be present for "plain view" seizure test to apply), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 (1989) 3 See also Johnston v. Makowski, 823 F.2d 387, 390 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1026 (1988); United States v. Marx, 485 F.2d 1179, 1184 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 986 (1974) 4 Sands, 899 F.2d at 916 (citing Sumrall v. United States, 360 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bellamy v. Cogdell
See, e.g., Conner v. Director of Div. of Adult Corrections, 870 F.2d 1384, 1386-87 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 363 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989); Bryant v. State of Maryland, 848 F.2d 492, 493 (4th Cir.1988); Kirby v. Dutton, 7 94 F.2d 245 , 247-48 (6th Cir 1986); Vail v. Procunier, 747 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1984) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Marik
No. 89-584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Virginia (2)
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.