green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
“memorandum of law" filed subsequent to court order treated as a "motion under rule 2-535(a) to revise the judgment”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kim v. Comptroller of Treasury
memorandum of law" filed subsequent to court order treated as a "motion under rule 2-535(a) to revise the judgment
cited
Cited "see"
Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.
See Dieter v. B & H Indus. of Southwest Fla., Inc., 880 F.2d 322, 326 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.
See Dieter v. B&H Indus. of Southwest Fla., Inc., 880 F.2d 322 , 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Casey v. Grossman
See Gluckstem v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 650 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Pickett v. Noba, Inc.
See Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Pickett v. Noba, Inc.
See Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Sager v. Maass
See Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825 , 832 n. 13 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Fila U.S.A., Inc. v. Nam Joo Kim
See Dieter v. B & H Industries of Southwest Florida, Inc., 880 F.2d 322, 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas A. Young v. Chase Riveland
See Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 828 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warren v. Director, District of Columbia Dept. of Corrections
See Ealy v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 897 F.2d 1159, 1161 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990) (in reviewing the grant of a motion for a directed verdict, the court of appeals asks whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and giving him every reasonable inference, the evidence is so one-sided that no reasonable juror could find in the plaintiff's favor). 7 The district court properly entered judgment as a matter of law in favor of the District of Columbia, because Warren offered no evidence linking his allegations to any official policy of the Distri…
discussed
Cited "see"
Linda S. Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
(2×)
See Ealy v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 897 F.2d 1159, 1161 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 370 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990); see also McNeal v. Hi-Lo Powered Scaffolding, Inc., 836 F.2d 637, 64-41 (D.C.Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dive N' Surf, Inc. v. Anselowitz
Similarly, trademark plaintiffs are entitled to full costs of the litigation, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, as pertains to Count II of the complaint because the affidavits of the former Promo Graphics employees establish that defendant’s infringement was malicious, fraudulent, deliberate and wilful. 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (a); accord Dieter v. B & H Indus., 880 F.2d 322 , 329 (11th Cir.1989), cert denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990) (holding that a trademark infringement case is “exceptional” and justifies the award of reasonable a attorney’s fee if defe…
cited
Cited "see"
Birthright v. Birthright, Inc.
See Dieter v. B & H Indus., Inc., 880 F.2d 322 , 329 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Perry Anthony Cribbs v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyrone Chalmers v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Farris Genner Morris, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David Keen v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leroy Hall, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jon Hall v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. Cushwa
The Court reiterated, however, that “the ex post facto clauses are inapplicable to ‘parole guidelines [that] “do not have the force and effect of law” but are merely “policies] ... that show how ... discretion is likely to be exercised.” ’ ” Id. (citations omitted); see Herrera v. State, 357 Md. 186, 188 , 742 A.2d 517 (1999); State v. Kanaras, 357 Md. 170, 184-85 , 742 A.2d 508 (1999); see also Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 671-72 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruby v. State
See also Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 662 , 574 A.2d 898, 912 (describing the Post Conviction Procedure Act as a statutory *107 substitute, under most circumstances, for the collateral common law remedies of habeas corpus and writ of error coram nobis), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990); Jones, 114 Md.App. at 478 , 691 A.2d at 232 (explaining that a “writ of error coram nobis remains available ... as a remedy to mount a collateral attack upon a prior conviction or sentence.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrison v. State
See also Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 663-64 , 574 A.2d 898, 912 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990); Shoemaker, 225 Md. 639 , 171 A.2d 468 ; Lloyd, 217 Md. at 670 , 143 A.2d at 484-85 . 5 In Shoemaker , we described the circumstances leading to the post conviction court’s grant of the defendant’s request for a belated appeal: The accused’s uncle had furnished funds to pay the lawyer who represented him.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland House of Correction v. Fields
See, e.g., Gluckstem v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied sub nom Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burger King Corp. v. Agad
See, e.g., the factors set forth in Dieter v. B & H Industries of Southwest Florida, Inc., 880 F.2d 322, 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990); Conagra, Inc. v. Singleton, 743 F.2d 1508, 1512 (11th Cir.1984); Burger King Corporation v. Mason, 710 F.2d 1480 , 1491-92 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1599 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Chambers
Compare Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990), aff'd 885 F.2d 1318 (8th Cir.1989) (counsel was ineffective by conducting no interviews with Jones).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Andre Bland v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henneberry, Director, Patuxent Institution
v.
Sutton
v.
Sutton
No. 90-385.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
498 U.S. 950
Cited by 22 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
Ct. App. Md. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.