green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.4 score
“the scope of fraud under these ______ statutes is broader than common law fraud, and . . . no misrepresentation of fact is required”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Boots
the scope of fraud under these statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lazore
the scope of fraud under these ______ statutes is broader than common law fraud, and . . . no misrepresentation of fact is required
cited
Cited "see"
Correll v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304, 308 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990), abrogated by Jackson v. State, 648 So.2d 85 (Fla.1994). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dorel Industries Inc.
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677, 684-85 (Fed.Cir.) (discussing the use of a hypothetical patent claim to simplify the analysis of whether or not prior art restricts the range of equivalents), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990), overruled on other grounds by Cardinal Chem.
cited
Cited "see"
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677, 683 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677, 683 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Peterson v. Murray, 904 F.2d 882, 888 (4th Cir.) (deeming similar "may" language permissive), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990); United States v. Washington, 819 F.2d 221, 225-26 (9th Cir.1987) (same). 42 The district court argued that the "unless" language in the rebuttal clause implied mandatoriness, since there would be no need for a rebuttal unless there was a mandatory presumption.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Dell v. Netherland
See Peterson v. Murray, 904 F.2d 882, 886-87 (4th Cir.) (Hall, Sprouse, Wilkinson, JJ.) ("[W]e believe that Ramos left to the states the decision concerning what, if anything, a jury should be told about commutation, pardon, and parole." (citing Turner v. Bass)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 (1990); Knox v. Collins, 928 F.2d 657, 660 (5th Cir. 1991) (rejecting petitioner's claim "that the Constitution mandates instruction on parole in capital cases" and holding that "[t]he decision whether to require such an instruction rests entirely with the state legislature"); cf. United States v. Chandler, …
cited
Cited "see"
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. International Biophysics Corporation
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assoc., 904 F.2d 677, 683 , 14 USPQ2d 1942, 1948 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Roger O'dell, III v. J.D. Netherland, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia, Joseph Roger O'dell, III v. J.D. Netherland, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia
See Peterson v. Murray, 904 F.2d 882, 886-87 (4th Cir.) (Hall, Sprouse, Wilkinson, JJ.) ("[W]e believe that Ramos left to the states the decision concerning what, if anything, a jury should be told about commutation, pardon, and parole." (citing Turner v. Bass )), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990); Knox v. Collins, 928 F.2d 657, 660 (5th Cir.1991) (rejecting petitioner's claim "that the Constitution mandates instruction on parole in capital cases" and holding that "[t]he decision whether to require such an instruction rests entirely with the state legislature"…
discussed
Cited "see"
General American Transportation Corporation v. Cryo-Trans, Incorporated
(2×)
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677 , 14 USPQ2d 1942 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Dell v. Netherland
See Peterson v. Murray, 904 F.2d 882, 886-87 (4th Cir.) (Hall, Sprouse, Wilkinson, JJ.) (“[W]e believe that Ramos left to the states the decision concerning what, if anything, a jury should be told about commutation, pardon, and parole.” (citing Turner v. Bass)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990); Knox v. Collins, 928 F.2d 657, 660 (5th Cir.1991) (rejecting petitioner’s claim “that .the Constitution mandates instruction on parole in capital eases” and holding that “[t]he decision whether to require such an instruction rests entirely with the state …
discussed
Cited "see"
Doctor's Associates, Inc. And Franchise World Headquarters, Inc. v. John M. Weible
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677, 683 (Fed.Cir.) (holding that “[i]t would be unfair” to deny a party the right to move for j.n.o.v. where “the court cut short counsel’s [directed verdict motion], making clear its view that the issue presented a jury question and that it wanted to move on to consider the jury instructions”), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990); see also Miller v. Premier Corp., 608 F.2d 973 , 979 n. 3 (4th Cir.1979) (holding that oral motion for “dismissal,” made in a colloquy between the cou…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sawyer
See McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. ___ ____________________________ Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 791-92 (1st Cir.) _______________________ (explaining that mail fraud requires both deceit and deprivation), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 (1990); D'Amato, 39 _____ ______ _______ F.3d at 1257 (explaining that "the deceit must be coupled with a contemplated harm to the victim") (quotation and citation omitted). -30- 30 The centerpiece of the gratuity statute is the giving of an item of "substantial value" (the "gratuity"), to an official, "for or because of any official act performed or to be p…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sawyer
See McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 791-92 (1st Cir.) (explaining that mail fraud requires both deceit and deprivation), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990); D’Amato, 39 F.3d at 1257 (explaining that "the deceit must be coupled with a contemplated harm to the victim”) (quotation and citation omitted). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S., Inc. v. Babbitt
See Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 901 F.2d 147, 152 , and n. 1 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990) (drawing distinction between procedural challenges to agency action, which must be brought within statutory review period or be forever barred, and substantive challenges, which are not subject to such a restriction); N.L.R.B.
cited
Cited "see"
Queen's University at Kingston v. Kinedyne Corp.
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assoc., 904 F.2d 677, 683-84 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neufeld
See McEvoy Travel Bureau v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 791 (1st Cir.1990) (“[T]he scheme must be intended to deceive another, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises, or other deceptive conduct”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.
(2×)
Accord Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assoc., 904 F.2d 677, 684 , 14 USPQ2d 1942, 1948 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990). 386 d.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kearse v. State
See Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1080 (Fla. 1994); accord Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304, 307 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990), abrogated on other grounds, Jackson v. State, 648 So.2d 85 (Fla. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. V. Billmyer
See McEvov Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 791 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 992 (1990). 12 The First Circuit has held that [a]n indictment may charge a crime by claiming that the defendant violated a statute in several different ways.
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. V. Billmyer
See McEvov Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 791 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lupper v. State
See Spencer v. State, 645 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1994); Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 1994); accord Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304, 307 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990), abrogated on other grounds, Jackson v. State, 648 So.2d 85 (Fla. 1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. State
See Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304, 308 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Galvis v. State
See Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990); Wyatt v. State, 641 So.2d 355, 359 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spencer v. State
See Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1078 (Fla. 1994); accord Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304, 307 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990), abrogated on other grounds, Jackson v. State, 648 So.2d 85 (Fla. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Esty v. State
Moreover, even if properly preserved, we would find no merit to this issue. "`[T]aken as a whole, the instructions correctly conveyed the concept of reasonable doubt to the jury.' There is no reasonable likelihood that the jurors who determined [Esty's] guilt applied the instructions in a way that violated the Constitution." Victor v. Nebraska, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 114 S.Ct. 1239, 1251 , 127 L.Ed.2d 583 (1994) (citation omitted) (quoting Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 140 , 75 S.Ct. 127, 138 , 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954)); accord Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304, 307 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 304 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990); Woods v. State, 596 So.2d 156 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 599 So.2d 1281 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 256 , 121 L.Ed.2d 188 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Genentech, Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd.
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677, 684 , 14 USPQ2d 1942, 1948 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, Intervenors
(2×)
See Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 901 F.2d 147, 150 (D.C.Cir.) ("If in proposing a rule the agency uses language that can reasonably be read as an invitation to comment on portions the agency does not explicitly propose to change, or if in responding to comments the agency uses language that shows that it did in fact reconsider an issue, a renewed challenge to the underlying rule or policy will be allowed."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Genentech, Inc. v. The Wellcome Foundation Limited
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677, 684 , 14 USPQ2d 1942, 1948 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990) 41 Another problem faced by plaintiffs/appellees is that the doctrine of equivalents is not available for the attainment in court of a scope of protection which encompasses subject matter deliberately removed from examination by the PTO during prosecution through narrow claiming.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gargoyles, Inc. And Pro-Tec, Inc. v. United States
See generally, Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assoc., 904 F.2d 677 , 14 USPQ2d 1942 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 (1990). 26 In order to apply the hypothetical claim analysis properly, however, the court must "visualiz[e] a hypothetical patent claim, sufficient in scope to literally cover the accused product." Wilson, 904 F.2d at 684 (emphasis in original).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts Metals, Inc. v. Florida Properties Marketing Group, Inc.
See Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Davis Geoffrey & Assocs., 904 F.2d 677 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
See McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 792 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990) (alleged kickbacks in violation of federal law were not deceptive because they did not induce plaintiff to give, up its exclusive dealership).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Williams
See Peterson v. Murray, 904 F.2d 882, 886 (4th Cir.) (“we believe that [California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992 , 103 S.Ct. 3446 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1171 (1983) ] left to the states the decision concerning what, if anything, a jury should be told about commutation, pardon, and parole”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wasserman v. Maimonides Medical Center
See, e.g., McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990); United States v. Lew, 875 F.2d 219 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Shelton, 848 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Selin
See also Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 901 F.2d 147, 151 (D.C.Cir.) (holding that agency's decision to reconsider a rule three years after it was first promulgated prompted a new period for judicial review), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Selin
See also Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 901 F.2d 147, 151 (D.C.Cir.) (holding that agency's decision to reconsider a rule three years after it was first promulgated prompted a new period for judicial review), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Katz v. AIWA America, Inc.
Id.; see also Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Assoc., 904 F.2d 677, 683 (Fed.Cir.1990) (“no infringement if the asserted scope of equivalency of what is literally claimed would encompass the prior art.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 537 , 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nuclear Management & Resources Council, Inc.
v.
Public Citizen
v.
Public Citizen
No. 90-360.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1990.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.