green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tunnell v. Ford Motor Co.
See Alevromagiros v. Hechinger, 993 F.2d 417, 420-421 (4th Cir.1993), citing Sexton v. Bell Helmets, Inc. 926 F.2d 331 , 337 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 112 S.Ct. 79 , 116 L.Ed.2d 52 (1991); quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Bartholomew, 224 Va. 421, 430 , 297 S.E.2d 675, 679 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Maine Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
See Faucher v. FEC, 743 F.Supp. 64, 68 (D.Me.1990), aff'd, 928 F.2d 468 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 112 S.Ct. 79 , 116 L.Ed.2d 52 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Stack v. Lobo
See Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc., 925 F.2d 682, 691 (3rd Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 112 S.Ct. 79 , 116 L.Ed.2d 52 (1991); *1376 In re Delmarva Sec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Moore
See also, Faucher v. Federal Election Commission, 743 F.Supp. 64, 68 (D.Me.1990), aff’d, 928 F.2d 468 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 112 S.Ct. 79 , 116 L.Ed.2d 52 (1991), following Buckley by narrowly construing the same federal election laws considered in Buckley .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castlerock Management, Ltd. v. Ultralife Batteries, Inc.
Finally, the restrictions of § 11 “concern[] only registration statements” and, thus, “any additional statements, including ‘roadshow’ presentations, analysts’ reports or statements to institutional investors (i.e. conference calls) are generally outside the reach of section 11.” Id. at 1360 n. 8 (citing In re Stac Electronics Securities Lit., 89 F.3d 1399, 1405 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied sub nom., 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997)). 6 Under § 12(2) 7 any defendant who: ‘offers or sells a security ... by means of a prospectus or oral communication’ c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elections Board v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
(2×)
See, e.g., Faucher v. FEC, 928 F.2d 468, 471-72 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied 502 U.S. 820 (1991); FEC v. Central Long Island Tax Reform Immediately Comm., 616 F.2d 45 , 53 (2nd Cir. 1980)(en banc); FEC v. Christian Action Network, 894 F. Supp. 946, 958 (W.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicholson v. American Safety Utility Corp.
See also Sexton by and through Sexton v. Bell Helmets, Inc., 926 F.2d 331, 338-39 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Election Commission v. Survival Education Fund, Inc.
Accordingly, I would characterize the July 1984 mailing not as express advocacy but as what the Supreme Court concluded MCFL's "Special Edition" was not--a "discussion of public issues that by their nature raise the names of certain politicians." Id.; see also Faucher v. Federal Election Comm'n, 928 F.2d 468, 470-71 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 112 S.Ct. 79 , 116 L.Ed.2d 52 (1991); Federal Election Comm'n v. National Org. for Women, 713 F.Supp. 428, 433-35 (D.D.C.1989). 80 The majority concludes that the contributions provision, construed so as to stay within constitutional limits,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Election Commission v. Survival Education Fund, Inc.
Accordingly, I would characterize the July 1984 mailing not as express advocacy but as what the Supreme Court concluded MCFL’s “Special Edition” was not — a “discussion of public issues that by their nature raise the names of certain politicians.” Id.; see also Faucher v. Federal Election Comm’n, 928 F.2d 468, 470-71 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 820 , 112 S.Ct. 79 , 116 L.Ed.2d 52 (1991); Federal Election Comm’n v. National Org. for Wom en, 713 F.Supp. 428, 433-35 (D.D.C.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yellow Freight System, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 90-1913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
502 U.S. 820
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.