green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.6 score
“the declaration of a mistrial is an extraordinary act which should only be granted if necessary to serve the ends of justice.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Zadeh
the declaration of a mistrial is an extraordinary act which should only be granted if necessary to serve the ends of justice.
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida (Duval County)
See Stano v. Dugger, 921 F.2d 1125, 1153 (11th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Latham
See Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 410 , 583 A.2d 218 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Alston v. State
See Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 422 , 583 A.2d 218 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Contemporary OB/GYN Associates
At the outset, because appellants’ challenge is raised in the context of the court’s failure to grant a mistrial or a new trial, we pause to review the standards that govern our review. “ ‘ “The declaration of a mistrial is an extraordinary act which should only be granted if necessary to serve the ends of justice.” ’ ” Hill v. State, 134 Md.App. 327, 348-49 , 759 A.2d 1164 (citations omitted), cert. denied, 362 Md. 188 , 763 A.2d 735 (2000); see Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 422 , 583 A.2d 218 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991). “ ‘The…
cited
Cited "see"
Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John Shanks
See Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 115 , 116 L.Ed.2d 84 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Shanks
See Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Loftin
(2×)
See Hunt v. State, 312 Md. 494 , 540 A.2d 1125 (1988) (upholding capital conviction despite trial court’s failure to provide a curative instruction after victim’s family members, who were never identified on the record, left courtroom crying), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ball v. Martin
See Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387 , 583 A.2d 218 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991); Prout v. State, 311 Md. 348 , 535 A.2d 445 (1988); Hickman v. State, 76 Md.App. 111 , 543 A.2d 870 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grandison v. State
See, e.g., Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 86 , 108 S.Ct. 2273, 2277 , 101 L.Ed.2d 80, 88 (1988); accord Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 418 , 583 A.2d 218, 233 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Laforest
See Stano v. Dugger, 921 F.2d 1125, 1142 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bobby Gonzales v. Robert J. Tansy
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-96 (1984); accord Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 115 (1991). 7 The Strickland test also applies to guilty plea challenges based on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
cited
Cited "see"
Crowe v. State
See Stano v. Dugger, 921 F2d 1125, 1144-1145, 1148 (11th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U. S. 835 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cook
See Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387 , 583 A.2d 218 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991); King v. State, 287 Md. 530 , 414 A.2d 909 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Rozelle Banks v. Dan M. Reynolds, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester Oklahoma Susan B. Loving, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Smith v. Murray, 477 U.S. 527, 536 , 106 S.Ct. 2661, 2667 , 91 L.Ed.2d 434 (1986); see Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1564 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 115 , 116 L.Ed.2d 84 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary N. Fields v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
(2×)
As a result, a defendant who desires to invoke his right to self-representation, thereby waiving his right to counsel, must do so “clearly and unequivocally.” United States v. Reddeck, 22 F.3d 1504, 1510 (10th Cir.1994); accord Stano v. Dugger, 921 F.2d 1125, 1144 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 116 , 116 L.Ed.2d 85 (1991); United States v. Lorick, 753 F.2d 1295, 1298 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 2342 , 85 L.Ed.2d 857 (1985); McNamara v. Riddle, 563 F.2d 125, 127 (4th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Chambers v. State
See Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 405 , 583 A.2d 218, 226 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evans v. State
(2×)
See also Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 431-32 , 583 A.2d 218, 239 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991) and State v. Colvin, 314 Md. 1 , 17-18 n. 5, 548 A.2d 506 , 514 n. 5 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony v. Schuppel
See State v. Zimmerman, 261 Md. 11 , 273 A.2d 156, 163 (1971); Johnson v. State, 292 Md. 405 , 439 A.2d 542, 559 (1982); Harris v. State, 295 Md. 329 , 455 A.2d 979, 983 (1983); see also Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387 , 583 A.2d 218, 227 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klauenberg v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 422 , 583 A.2d 218, 235 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991); State v. Hawkins, 326 Md. 270, 277 , 604 A.2d 489, 493 (1992); White v. State, 300 Md. 719, 737 , 481 A.2d 201, 210 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 837 (1985); Wilhelm v. State, 272 Md. 404, 429 , 326 A.2d 707, 723 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkins v. State
See also Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 401 , 583 A.2d 218, 224 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Nance v. Michael A. Nelson, Robert T. Stephan
In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, "the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319 ; see also Tapia v. Tansy, 926 F.2d 1554, 1562 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pugh v. State
Ordinarily, “consideration of a claim of ineffective counsel is best left to a post conviction hearing____” Harris v. State, 295 Md. 329, 337 , 455 A.2d 979 (1983); see also Hunt v. State, 321 Md. 387, 407 , 583 A.2d 218 (1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 835 , 112 S.Ct. 117 , 116 L.Ed.2d 86 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carballea
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-8147.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
502 U.S. 835
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.