green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Standard Fruit”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Martin v. Kansas Department of Revenue
we are unwilling to conclude that the legislature intended to authorize the suspension of drivers' licenses based on the fruits of illegal arrests
cited
Cited "see"
Ackerberg v. Citicorp USA, Inc.
See Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 477-478 (9th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Soto v. American Honda Motor Co.
See Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 477-478 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Kaltwasser v. AT & T MOBILITY LLC
See Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 477-78 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryant v. Service Corp. International
See Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 477-78 (9th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
MacIas v. Excel Building Services LLC
See Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 477-478 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bencharsky v. Cottman Transmission Systems, LLC
In determining whether to issue an order compelling arbitration, the Court may not review the merits of the dispute, but must limit its inquiry to (1) whether the arbitration agreement is governed by Chapter One of the Federal Arbitration Act (rather than Chapter Two or Chapter Three); (2) whether the contract containing the arbitration agreement evidences a transaction involving interstate commerce; (3) whether there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate; and (4) whether the dispute falls within the scope of the agreement to arbitrate. 9 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 202, and 302; see Nicaragua v. Standard…
cited
Cited "see"
Bates v. Jones
See Legislature v. Eu, 54 Cal.3d 492 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 283 , 816 P.2d 1309 (1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1292 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9535, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,471 Tom Bates Edward H. Lyman Richard Sterling Ardis Graham Richard D. Lewis Lawrence J. Buchalter Jonathan Browning Rachel Sherman Martha A. Escutia Sylvia Hernandez Ana Rosa Pena Claudia Navar Barbara J. Friedman Susan Zarakov Harriet Sculley v. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California Bradley J. Clark Alameda County Registrar of Voters Conny McCormack Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters, and Peter F. Schabarum Lewis K. Uhler Lee A. Phelps National Tax Limitation Committee Alliance of California Taxpayers & Involved Voters, Intervenors-Appellees. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California, and Peter F. Schabarum Lewis K. Uhler, Intervenors-Appellants v. Tom Bates Edward H. Lyman Richard D. Lewis Lawrence J. Buchalter Jonathan Browning Rachel Sherman, and National Tax Limitation Committee Alliance of California Taxpayers & Involved Voters, Intervenors v. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California
See Legislature v. Eu, 54 Cal.3d 492 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 283 , 816 P.2d 1309 (1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1292 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992). 6 Thereafter, in 1995, Tom Bates, a former member of the California Assembly, and a group of his constituents filed the present action, also alleging the lifetime term limits of Proposition 140 are unconstitutional.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory v. Electro-Mechanical Corp.
See Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 479 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992); Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp., 708 F.2d 1458, 1464 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. Harper
(2×)
See Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Webb, 809 S.W.2d 899, 902 (Tex.App.Texarkana 1991, no writ), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1293 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992). [1] Nor did Harper request an abatement from the Illinois court before seeking an anti-suit injunction from the Texas court. [2] These factors presumably also support the trial court's conclusion that Golden Rule's lawsuit was "brought for the purpose of harassment." However, not only were the Harpers residents of Illinois, but the choice-of-law provision of their insurance agreement specified, in effect, that the transaction was gover…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ishwar Jain v. Henri Courier De Mere
Convention, Art. 11(3); see Republic of Nicaragua v. Standard Fruit Co., 937 F.2d 469, 477-79 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1294 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992); Ledee, 684 F.2d at 187 ; Beromun Aktiengesellschaft v. Societa Industriale Agricola “Tresse” di Dr. Domenico e Dr. Antonio dal Ferro, 471 F.Supp. 1163 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Trail Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Houston
See, e.g., Jama Construction v. City of Los Angeles, 938 F.2d 1045 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1293 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992); Southern Pacific Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
(2×)
See also Jama Const. v. City of Los Angeles, 938 F.2d 1045 , 1047-48 (9th Cir.1991) (Dismissed as unripe where plaintiff "did not seek compensation through California procedures before bringing its federal action."), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1293 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992); Bateson v. Geisse, 857 F.2d 1300, 1306 (9th Cir.1988) (Because Montana recognizes inverse condemnation under the State Constitution, plaintiff must "pursue [that claim] before he can state a [federal] taking claim."). 28 Oregon argues that the Dodds' Fifth Amendment claim is unripe because they have yet to pursu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atkinson v. Arnold
Co., 719 S.W.2d 161, 163 (Tex.1986); see also Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Webb, 809 S.W.2d 899, 902 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1991, writ dism’d w.o.j.), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 1293 , 117 L.Ed.2d 516 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Finkelman
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 91-947.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1992.
503 U.S. 919
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Kansas (1) · D. Oregon (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.