green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“generally a trier of fact may draw an adverse inference from the destruction of evidence relevant to a case”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Turiano v. Schnarrs
(2×)
But see Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992) (relevant case law for qualified immunity determination is issued by Supreme Court and applicable circuit court).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.
generally a trier of fact may draw an adverse inference from the destruction of evidence relevant to a case
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Doe
(2×)
See Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 551 (2d Cir. 1991) (declining to rely on dicta when determining whether right was clearly established), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S. Ct. 1565 , 1181 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Middaugh
(2×)
See Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Casey
See generally State v. Green, 306 S.C. 94 , 409 S.E.2d 785 (1991) (absent showing that solicitor intentionally exercised strike because of discriminatory reasons, trial judge’s findings that strike was not racially motivated should be given great deference on appeal), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1566 , 118 L.Ed.2d 212 (1992); Gill, 319 S.C. 283, 290 , 460 S.E.2d 412, 416 (“There will seldom be much evidence bearing on [the issue of invidious discrimination], and the best evidence often will be the demeanor of the attorney who exercises the challenge.... evaluation of the prosecu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Shechter v. Comptroller of City of New York
(2×)
See Francis v. Coughlin, 891 F.2d 43, 46 (2d Cir.1989) (citing Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 , 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987)). 27 Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992); see also Rodriguez, 66 F.3d at 476 . 28 The analysis of the "clearly established right" issue by the district court in this case does not meet these standards.
cited
Cited "see"
Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
See Akiona v. United States, 938 F.2d 158, 161 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1567 , 118 L.Ed.2d 212 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Phillips
(2×)
See Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Phillips
(2×)
See Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992). 15 We now review in turn each of plaintiffs' claims to determine whether a clearly established right was violated, or whether any disputed factual issues identified by the district court are material to the resolution of defendants' qualified immunity defense.
cited
Cited "see"
Gilbert v. Selsky
See Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hudson
See United States v. Ochoa-Fabian, 935 F.2d 1139, 1142 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992); United States v. Sasser, 974 F.2d 1544, 1551-53 (10th Cir.1992), petition for cert. filed, — U.S.L.W.-(U.S. Dec. 4, 1992) (No. 92-6815); Francisco-Lopez, 939 F.2d at 1410 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. Martin
(2×)
Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 638, 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); see also Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeLoreto v. Ment
(2×)
Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 638 , 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3038 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); see also Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992); Komlosi v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 64 F.3d 810, 815-16 (2d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Ass'n v. Forst
(2×)
See, e.g., Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re State Police Litigation
(2×)
See, e.g., Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gyadu v. Workers' Compensation Commission
(2×)
Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 638 , 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3038 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); see also Jermosen v. Smith, 945 F.2d 547, 550 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Easler
E.g., State v. Tomlin, 299 S.C. 294 , 384 S.E. (2d) 707 (1989); see also State v. Green, 306 S.C. 94 , 409 S.E. (2d) 785 (1991) (articulating test), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1566 , 118 L.Ed. (2d) 212 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Adams
(2×)
To date, we have interpreted Batson to require the party that exercised the peremptory challenges at issue to present an explanation that is racially neutral, clear and reasonably specific, and legitimate, E.g., State v. Tomlin, 299 S.C. 294 , 384 S.E. (2d) 707 (1989); see also State v. Green, 306 S.C. 94 , 409 S.E. (2d) 785 (1991) (articulating test), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 962 , 112 S.Ct. 1566 , 118 L.Ed. (2d) 212 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Ray Barbee and Juanita Elizabeth Barbee, Also Known as Juanita Elizabeth Lopez-Ayon
See, e.g., United States v. Ochoa-Fabian, 935 F.2d 1139, 1141 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992).
Jermosen
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
No. 91-6939.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. California (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.