green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners
See Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac R.R. v. United States, 945 F.2d 765 , 768 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1667 , 118 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992). “[W]henever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.” Pineville Real Estate Operation Corp. v. Michael, 32 F.3d 88, 89 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1127 , 115 S.Ct. 935 , 130 L.Ed.2d 880 (1995). 3 It appears from the text of the Complaint that Plaintiffs theory of federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Gretkowski
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 680-681 (3d Cir.1991) (availability of judicial review of administrative decisions satisfies requirements of procedural due process), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwards
See Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 941 F.2d 864, 871 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1667 , 118 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 882 F.2d 1556, 1568 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
John E. Long, Inc. v. Borough of Ringwood
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 679 , (3d Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Southern New England Telephone Company Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel United States Telephone Association Ameritech Corporation U S West, Inc. Rural Telephone Coalition Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company Gte Service Corporation Gte Alaska, Incorporated Gte Arkansas Incorporated Gte California, Incorporated Gte Florida, Incorporated Gte Midwest, Incorporated Gte South, Incorporated Gte Southwest, Incorporated Gte North, Incorporated Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company, Incorporated Gte West Coast, Incorporated Contel of Minnesota, Inc. Contel of the South, Inc. Missouri Public Service Commission Gte Northwest, Incorporated Pacific Bell Nevada Bell, Intervenors on Appeal. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Association for Local Telecommunications Services American Telephone and Telegraph Company Telecommunications Resellers Association the Competition Policy Institute Information Technology Association of America National Cable Television Association, Inc. Internet Access Coalition Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee Worldcom, Inc. Sprint Corporation Telco Communications Group, Inc. Excel Telecommunications, Inc. Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies Time Warner Communications Holdings, Inc. MCI Telecommunications Corporation Ny Telephone New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Intervenors on Appeal. America's Carriers Telecommunication Association, Intervenors on Appeal, Commercial Internet Exchange Association, Amicus Curiae. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Ameritech Corporation Time Warner Communications Holdings Us Telephone Association Gte Service Corporation Gte Alaska, Incorporated Gte Arkansas, Incorporated Gte California, Incorporated Gte Florida, Incorporated Gte Midwest, Incorporated Gte South, Incorporated Gte Southwest, Incorporated Benjamin Wayne McCoin Inc. Gte Northwest, Incorporated Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company, Incorporated Gte West Coast, Incorporated Contel of Minnesota, Inc. Contel of the South, Inc. Association for Local Telecommunications Services Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. Bell Atlantic-Washington, D.C., Inc. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc. Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc. Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. New York Telephone Company New England Telephone and Telegraph Company Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance, Intervenors on Appeal. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company Telecommunications Resellers Association MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Lbc Communications, Inc. Worldcom, Inc. Competitive Telecommunications Association, Intervenors on Appeal
See Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 941 F.2d 864, 871 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1667 , 118 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 882 F.2d 1556, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1076 , 110 S.Ct. 1125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
See Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 941 F.2d 864, 871 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1667 , 118 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 882 F.2d 1556, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1076 , 110 S.Ct. 1125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. v. Delaware River Port Authority
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Phila., 945 F.2d 667 , 686 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992) (Unsuccessful applicants for license to operate dance halls can maintain claim for substantive due process violation upon evidence the government deliberately and arbitrarily abused its power; legitimate state concerns with adequate factual bases are not per se arbitrary and unreasonable.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Kansas Public Employees Retirement System
See Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 941 F.2d 864, 871 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1667 , 118 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 882 F.2d 1556, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1076 , 110 S.Ct. 1125 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: KPERS v.
See Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett- Packard Co., 941 F.2d 864, 871 (9th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 (1992); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 882 F.2d 1556, 1568 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Austin v. Neal
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 683-84 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. City of Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kan.
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 683 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
District Counsel 33, American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees v. City of Philadelphia
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 678 (3d Cir.1991) (noting entitlement may exist for benefit sought but not yet obtained if state law limits exercise of discretion by state official responsible for conferring the benefit), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Payne v. Fontenot
See Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of *423 Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992) (holding that denial of dancing hall license for legitimate government reasons not taking of property or due process violation); Richardson v. Town of Eastover, 922 F.2d 1152 (4th Cir.1991) (holding that because business license to operate nightclub issued at discretion of town for public convenience and necessity, no property deprivation when not renewed); Martinez-Velez v. Simonet, 919 F.2d 808 (1st Cir.1990); Brown v. City of Lake Geneva,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Clayton v. United States
Inc. v. United States, 505 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1974); see Shimota v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 510, 518 (1990) (holding that tax exemptions are not granted by implication) (citing cases), aff'd, 943 F.2d 1312 (Fed.Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1669 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. Christie
It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it.’ ” Rogin v. Bensalem Township, 616 F.2d 680, 689 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1737 , 68 L.Ed.2d 223 (1981) (quoting Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 487-88 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955)); see also Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 682 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992); Mabey Bridge & Shore, Inc.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Sidamon-Eristoff
It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it.” 616 F.2d at 689 (quoting Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 487-88 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955)); see also Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 682 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Memo Money Order Co., Inc. v. Sidamon-Eristoff
It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it.” 616 F.2d at 689 (quoting Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 487-88 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955)); see also Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 682 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Spirtos
See also, Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 941 F.2d 864, 871-72 (9th Cir.1991) (motion for recusal filed six weeks after learning of circumstances predicating bias was untimely), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1667 , 118 L.Ed.2d 388 (1992); United States v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 814 F.Supp. 1165, 1172 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (motion filed two months after discovery of relevant facts was deemed untimely); United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 946 F.2d 180 , 183 (2d Cir.1991) (a motion to recuse is timely if it is filed at the “earliest possible moment” following discovery of the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryant v. Clevelands, Inc.
The Fourth Circuit recognizes this standard and, in doing so, follows the rale that where the jurisdictional facts are intertwined with facts central to the merits of a dispute, “the proper course of action for the district court ... is to find that jurisdiction exists and deal with the objection as a direct attack on the merits of the plaintiffs case.” United States v. North Carolina, 180 F.3d 574 (4th Cir.1999)(Rule 12(b)(1) motion is not proper vehicle to resolve jurisdictional issue in Title VII case where the merits and jurisdictional questions are closely related); see McGinnis v. So…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Penn Forest Township
See Rogin v. Bensalem Township, 616 F.2d 680, 695 (3d Cir.1980) (“In Pennsylvania the procedure for challenging zoning ordinances substantially conforms with the general due process guidelines enunciated by the Supreme Court.”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1737 , 68 L.Ed.2d 223 (1981); see also Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Phila., 945 F.2d 667 , 681 (3d Cir.1991) (“The availability of a full judicial mechanism to challenge the administrative decision to deny an application, even an application that *508 was wrongly denied, precluded a determination that the decision was…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mortenson v. United States
See, e.g., McDonald v. United States, 939 F.2d 916 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1669 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992); Williams v. United States, 931 F.2d 805 (11th Cir.1991); Hochstein v. United States, 900 F.2d 543, 545-48 (2d Cir.1990); Commonwealth Nat’l Bank of Dallas v. United States, 665 F.2d 743, 757-58 (5th Cir.1982); Emshwiller v. United States, 565 F.2d 1042, 1045-46 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Durham, 94-2 USTC ¶ 50,331 , 1994 WL 421448 , at *3 (N.D.Okla.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sammon v. New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners
It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it.” 616 F.2d at 689 (quoting Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 487-88 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 464 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955)); see also Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 682 (3d Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alice Sammon v. New Jersey Board Of Medical Examiners
It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it." 25 616 F.2d at 689 (quoting Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 487-88 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 464 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955)); see also Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 682 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pueblo of Santo Domingo
v.
Thompson and United States v. Thompson
v.
Thompson and United States v. Thompson
No. 91-1179; No. 91-1346.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1992.
503 U.S. 984
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 941 F. 2d 1074.