green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Sjtatments made by out-of-court declar-ants that explain subsequent police conduct are admissible.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of D.N.
ere speculation that the tape might be of assistance to him on appeal provides no basis for 27 meaningful appellate review.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Love
sjtatments made by out-of-court declar-ants that explain subsequent police conduct are admissible.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Juvenile Male
detention" began at "the moment was first placed in physically restrictive custody
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Middleton
See State v. Dunn, 817 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Mo. banc 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 992 , 112 S.Ct. 1689 , 118 L.Ed.2d 403 (1992); Borden, 605 S.W.2d at 92 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hyman
See United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 120 (4th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 992 (1992). 11 cause to do so.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juvenile Male, United States of America v. Under Seal, (Three Cases)
See United States v. Romulus, 949 F.2d 713, 716 (4th Cir.1991) (“The thirty-day speedy trial period begins to run from the date on which a juvenile is taken into federal custody.”), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 992 , 112 S.Ct. 1690 , 118 L.Ed.2d 403 (1992); United States v. Doe, 882 F.2d 926, 928 (5th Cir.1989) (“detention” began at “the moment [the juvenile] was first placed in physically restrictive custody”).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Weston
See State v. Dunn, 817 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Mo. banc 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 992 , 112 S.Ct. 1689 , 118 L.Ed.2d 403 (1992), regarding destruction of evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lemrick Nelson, Jr.
See United States v. Romulus, 949 F.2d 713, 715-16 (4th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 992 , 112 S.Ct. 1690 , 118 L.Ed.2d 403 (1992); United States v. C.G., 736 F.2d 1474, 1478-79 (11th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Isa Yusufu, A/K/A Uni Kano, A/K/A David Barbarine
U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1; see United States v. Romulus, 949 F.2d 713, 717 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 992 , 112 S.Ct. 1690 , 118 L.Ed.2d 403 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juvenile Male
Ngo v. United States, 115 S.Ct. 1968 (1995), and Kwok v. United States, 115 S.Ct. 1968 (1995), and Wang v. United States, 115 S.Ct. 2568 (1995), and Wong v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 190 (1995); see also United States v. Romulus, 949 F.2d 713, 716 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 992 (1992). 17 The period of time between the government's filing of a motion to transfer a juvenile to adult status, and the district court's ruling on that motion, is properly excluded from the thirty-day period "in the interest of justice." See Wong, 40 F.3d at 1371 ; Romulus, 949 F.2d at 716 . 18 Defendant wa…
Simmons
v.
Simmons
v.
Simmons
No. 91-7432.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1992.
503 U.S. 992
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.