green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke Street Ltd. P'ship v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS CALVERT CTY.
See National Advertising Company v. Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 931 , 112 S.Ct. 1997 , 118 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992), Bireline v. Seagondollar, 567 F.2d 260 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied 444 U.S. 842 , 100 S.Ct. 83 , 62 L.Ed.2d 54 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Renteria v. Donahue
See National Advertising Co. v. City of Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1166-67 (4th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 931 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard Ricky Kelly v. Tom C. Martin, Franklin Freeman, J v. Turlington
See National Advertising Co. v. City of Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1161-62 (4th Cir.1991) (borrowing a three-year limitations period from North Carolina law for 1983 actions in that state), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 931 (1992). 11 In conclusion, we AFFIRM the district court's DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE of the claims against defendant Martin, as well as its DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE of the claims against defendants Freeman and Turlington. 1 The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to the applicable rules.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wattley v. City of Charlotte
STAT. § 1-53(4); see also, Nat’l Advertising Co. v. City of Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1161 (4th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 931 (1992) (statute of limitations for § 1983 claims “borrowed from the analogous state statute of limitations.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Napa Valley Publishing Co. v. City of Calistoga
See also National Advertising Co. v. City of Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1168 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 931 , 112 S.Ct. 1997 , 118 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale
(2×)
See, e.g., Commercial Builders of N. Cal. v. City of Sacramento, 941 F.2d 872 (9th Cir.1991) (applying a takings analysis to an ordinance conditioning building permits on payment of fee to offset burdens of providing low-income housing for workers at such developments), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 931 , 112 S.Ct. 1997 , 118 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992); Blue Jeans Equities W. v. City and County of San Francisco, 3 Cal. App.4th 164 , 4 Cal. Rptr.2d 114 (1992) (applying a takings analysis to an ordinance conditioning building permit on payment of fee for traffic control programs).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schnabel Foundation Co.
v.
Harbor Insurance Co.
v.
Harbor Insurance Co.
No. 91-1440.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1992.
504 U.S. 931
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of District of Columbia Chapter of the Federal Bar Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of petitioner to seek the view of the United States denied. Certiorari denied.