green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Middle Bucks”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
First Franklin Corp. v. Barkley (In Re Anthony)
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1154 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993); In re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc., 987 S.W.2d 571, 574 (Tex.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vicksburg Partners, LP v. Stephens
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1154 (5TH Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993); In re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc., 987 S.W.2d 571, 574 (Tex.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vicksburg Partners, L.P. v. Angela Stephens
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1154 (5TH Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993); In re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc., 987 S.W.2d 571, 574 (Tex. 1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sidney Coal Co., Inc. v. Massanari
Next, the Defendants and the Trustees assert that this action involves “the same parties or their privies” that were involved in Massey I. 18 That case involved three of the plaintiffs in the instant action and two parties not before the court in this case. [See Record No. 54, p. 13; Record No. 57, p. 15, n. 14.] 19 However, all of the companies involved as Plaintiffs in the present action are in direct privity with the plaintiff companies in Massey I. [Record No. 48, p. 2; Record No. 54, pp. 13-14; Record No. 57, p. 15, n. 14]; see Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial,…
cited
Cited "see"
Willhauck v. Town of Mansfield
See D.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1372 (3d Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993); Doe v. Hillsboro Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes Training Inc. v. Cook
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1154 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993); In re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. 987 S.W.2d 571, 574 (Tex.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carrigan v. Davis
See D.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1371 (3d Cir.1992) (recognizing dependence of institutionalized persons, such as prison inmates), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1154 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993) (citing 6A ARTHUR Corbin, Contracts § 1376, at 20-21 (1962) & 7-9 (Supp.1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dutton v. Washington Physicians Health Program
See Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wn.2d 91, 126-27 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992) (citing Creelman v. Svenning, 67 Wn.2d 882, 885 , 410 P.2d 606 (1966)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 (1993); Savage v. State, 127 Wn.2d 434, 442 , 899 P.2d 1270 (1995) (policy justifies extension of quasi-judicial immunity from an agent to the State).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nicole K. by & Through Peter K. v. Upper Perkiomen School District
See D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1368-76 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 *937 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993); Collier, 956 F.Supp. at 1215 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Henderson v. Gunther
(2×)
See D.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Voca tional Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1373-76 (3d Cir.1992) (concluding that State did not create danger where school employees failed to investigate and prevent sexual abuse of female student by classmates), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barkauskie v. Indian River School District
See D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1369 (3d Cir.1992) (en banc) (“[W]hen the state enters into a special relationship with a particular citizen, it may be held liable for failing to protect him or her from the private actions of third parties.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993); see generally DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dep’t of Social Servs., 489 U.S. 189 , 109 S.Ct. 998 , 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York Life Insurance v. Deshotel
See Dillard v. Security Pacific Brokers, Inc., 835 F.2d 607, 609 (5th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993) (for res judica-ta, “whether the second suit involves the same cause of action ... depends ... upon the scope of the compulsory counterclaim rule.”) As discussed earlier, the three delic-tual actions are based upon the “same aggregate of operative facts” as the interpleader action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1159 (5th Cir.1992) (reversing lower court’s dismissal of antitrust claims because plaintiff did not need “to show how he was damaged at this point” and because allegations “that his business and property were injured ... [were] sufficient to satisfy the requirements of notice pleading”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.
See Sanders Confectionery Prod., Inc. v. Heller Fin., Inc., 973 F.2d 474, 486 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079, 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993); Laven v. Flanagan, 695 F.Supp. 800, 807 (D.N.J.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
PAUL EDWARD NEAL v. S.D. WILLIAMS, et al
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1151 (5th Cir. 1992) (refusal to consolidate), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 (1993); Hammons v. Adams, 786 F.2d 1253, 1253 (5th Cir. 1986) (severance).
cited
Cited "see"
HARRY L. BOWLES v. CHARLES N. SCHWARZ, JR.; JACK O'NEILL
See Dillard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 961 F.2d 1148, 1161 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Atlanta Retail, Inc. (In Re Atlanta Retail, Inc.)
Howell Hydrocarbons, Inc. v. Adams, 897 F.2d 183 (5th Cir.1990) (finding that a bankruptcy court's confirmation plan could not preclude a later RICO claim because the bankruptcy court would not have jurisdiction over that claim); Barnett v. Stern, 909 F.2d 973 (7th Cir.1990) (holding that the confirmation plan could only preclude a later claim if the later claim were within the bankruptcy court's core jurisdiction and could be heard in a contested proceeding); compare Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc., 973 F.2d 474 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lucas v. State
Downs v. United States, 382 F.Supp. 713, 750 (M.D.Tenn.1974) (in a Federal Tort Claims Act case it was unnecessary to decide whether government agents were immune, because the government would not be immune even if they were), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.2d 990 (6th Cir.1975); see also Lutheran Day Care v. Snokomish Cy., 119 Wash.2d 91, 108 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992), cer. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Porter v. NationsCredit Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Porter)
Compare Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc., 973 F.2d 474 , 483 n. 4 (6th Cir.1992) (“While the specific causes of action, such as RICO, exist independently of bankruptcy cases, an action against a bankruptcy trustee [under RICO] for the trustee’s administration of the bankruptcy estate could not”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)
United States v. Nagalingam, No. 97-6433, 1998 WL 739822 , at *3 (6th Cir.1998); see also United States v. Sissler, No. 91-2113, 1992 WL 126974, at *6-7 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. City of Philadelphia
See, e.g., D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, 972 F.2d 1364 , 1372 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993); Doe v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 649 F.2d 134 (2nd Cir.1981), after remand, 709 F.2d 782 (2nd Cir.) cert, denied sub nom., Catholic Home Bureau v. Doe, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 195 , 78 L.Ed.2d 171 (1983); Taylor By and Through Walker v. Ledbetter, 818 F.2d 791 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1065 , 109 S.Ct. 1337 , 103 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989); Baby Neal v. Casey, 821 F.Supp. 320, 335 (E.D.Pa.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of Spokane
See also Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wn.2d 91, 107 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992) (policy rationale for quasi-judicial immunity), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S. Ct. 1044 , 122 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mission Springs Inc. v. City of Spokane
See also Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wash.2d 91, 107 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992) (policy rationale for quasijudicial immunity), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chapman v. Wells
See, e.g., Sanders Confectionery Prods., Inc. v. Heller Fin., Inc., 973 F.2d 474 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1046 , 122 L.Ed.2d 355 (1993) (affirming dismissal of debtor’s lender liability action as res judicata of the prior bankruptcy proceeding); K & K Implement (affirming dismissal of creditor’s *729 action against debtor as res judicata of the prior bankruptcy proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Death Row Prisoners v. Ridge
See also D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, 972 F.2d 1364 , 1368 (3rd Cir.1992), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993) (reviewing qualified immunity defense on appeal and stating that “the predicate question ... [is] whether plaintiffs allege deprivation of any right secured by the constitution.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacques v. Sharp
See also Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wn.2d 91, 104-05 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992) (declining to limit sources of legislative history to the House and Senate Journals), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 1079 (1993). 23 Senate Comm, on Judiciary, Bill Rep., SSB 4541 at 1-2 (Feb. 3, 1984, as passed); Senate Comm, on Judiciary, Bill Rep., SB 4541 at 1-2 (Feb. 2, 1984); Senate Bill Rep., SB 4541 at 1 (Jan. 16, 1984); House Comm, on Judiciary, Bill Rep., SSB 4541 at 1-2 (Feb. 17, 1984) (italics ours). 24 Kyle Aiken (Counsel, Senate Judiciary Comm.), A Summary of the Domestic Violence Prevention Act at…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lillard v. Shelby County Board of Education
See Ingraham, v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 673-74 , 97 S.Ct. 1401, 1413-14 , 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977); see also D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1368 (3d Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lillard v. Shelby County Board of Education
See Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 673-74 , 97 S.Ct. 1401, 1413-14 , 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977); see also D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical Sch., 972 F.2d 1364 , 1368 (3d Cir.1992) (en banc ), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993). 43 We first note that, despite the plaintiffs' suggestions to the contrary, we have no doubt that the "shocks the conscience" standard is applicable here.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sissler
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-717.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1993.
506 U.S. 1079
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.