green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thompson, Michael D.
See United States v. Sherod, 960 F.2d 1075, 1077 (D.C.Cir.) (failure to renew motion for acquittal at close of all evidence means there is “nothing to review”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 385 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
See United States v. Butler, 970 F.2d 1017, 1021-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 386 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Tucker v. County of Jefferson
See United States v. Moore, 742 F.Supp. 727, 728 (N.D.N.Y.1990), aff'd, 968 F.2d 216 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 385 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Beckett
See United States v. Butler, 970 F.2d 1017, 1024 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Carroll Beckett
See United States v. Butler, 970 F.2d 1017, 1024 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 386 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. West
The Second Circuit has held that where, as here, the police are making a prompt and reasonable effort to identify the perpetrator, handcuffs and police custody are “necessary incidents of an on-the-scene identification” that do not “render the pre-trial identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive.” Bautista, 23 F.3d at 730 (show-up not unnecessarily suggestive where defendant was presented to the witness “in handcuffs; at night; in the custody of police officers; with his face lit by flashlights; and in the presence of [an officer] who, each time [the witness] identified a susp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goston v. Rivera
The Second Circuit has held that where, as here, the police are making a prompt and reasonable effort to identify the perpetrator, handcuffs and police custody are “necessary incidents of an on-the-scene identification” that do not “render the pretrial identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive.” Bautista, 23 F.3d at 730 (show-up not unnecessarily suggestive where defendant was presented to the witness “in handcuffs; at night; in the custody of police officers; with his face lit by flashlights; and in the presence of [an officer] who, each time [the witness] identified a suspe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Horne v. Perlman
Where, as here, the police are making a prompt and reasonable effort to identify the perpetrator, handcuffs and police custody are “necessary incidents of an on-the-scene identification” that do not “render the pre-trial identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive.” Bautista, 23 F.3d at 730 (show-up not unnecessarily suggestive where defendant was presented to the witness “in handcuffs; at night; in the custody of police officers; with his face lit by flashlights; and in the presence of [an officer] who, each time [the witness] identified a suspect, radioed to his fellow office…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tobias v. Portuondo
Where, as here, the police are making a prompt and reasonable effort to identify the perpetrator, handcuffs and police custody are “necessary incidents of an on-the-scene identification” that do not “render the pre-trial identification procedure unnecessarily suggestive.” Bautista, 23 F.3d at 730 (show-up not unnecessarily suggestive where defendant was presented to the witness “in handcuffs; at night; in the custody of police officers; with his face lit by flashlights; and in the presence of [an officer] who, each time [the witness] identified a suspect, radioed to his fellow office…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eggers
See, e.g., United States v. Hall, 969 F.2d 1102 (D.C.Cir.) ("voluntariness inquiry turns not on whether a 'reasonable' person in the defendant’s position would have felt compelled to consent to a police officer’s request to search, but, rather, on whether the accused herself actually felt compelled to consent”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 481 , 121 L.Ed.2d 386 (1992); United States v. Mendoza-Salgado, 964 F.2d 993 (10th Cir.1992) (same); United States v. Wilson, 895 F.2d 168, 171 (4th Cir.1990) ("the determination of consent to search is subjective”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul David Logan
See, e.g., United States v. Powell, 39 F.3d 894, 896 (8th Cir.1994), and United States v. Brown, 956 F.2d 782, 786-87 (8th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Templeman, 965 F.2d 617, 619 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 482 , 121 L.Ed.2d 387 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hunter
See, e.g., United States v. Butler, 970 F.2d 1017, 1021 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 386 (1992) (witness’ selective identification of two robbers, while failing to identify a third man, supported the conclusion that the identification procedures comported with due process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Ortega, Jesus Mancinas
See, e.g., United States v. Font-Ramirez, 944 F.2d 42, 49 (1st Cir.1991) (burden on government to prove sufficient facts for enhancements for, e.g., ... possession of firearms), cert. denied, [ 502 U.S. 1065 , 112 S.Ct. 954 , 117 L.Ed.2d 122 ] (1992).”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 480 , 121 L.Ed.2d 386 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
White
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-6122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1992.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.