green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring Lakes
See *64 Corum v. Univ. of N.C. , 330 N.C. 761 , 782, 413 S.E.2d 276 , 289 ("[I]n the absence of an adequate state remedy, one whose state constitutional rights have been abridged has a direct claim against the State under our Constitution."), reh'g denied , 331 N.C. 558 , 418 S.E.2d 664 , cert. denied , 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 493 , 121 L.Ed.2d 431 (1992) ; *525 Midgett v. N.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Kane v. North Carolina Teachers' & State Employees' Comprehensive Major Medical Plan
See Corum v. Univ. of N.C., 330 N.C. 761 , 413 S.E.2d 276 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arrington v. Martinez
See Craig, 363 N.C. at 338 , 678 S.E.2d at 354 (stating that “[i]n the absence of an adequate state remedy, one whose state constitutional rights have been abridged has a direct claim against the State under our Constitution.” (quoting Corum v. University of North Carolina Through Bd. of Governors, *266 330 N.C. 761, 782 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 289 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Copper ex rel. Copper v. Denlinger
See Corum v. Univ. of N.C., 330 N.C. 761, 782 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 289 (“Therefore, in the absence of an adequate state remedy, one whose state constitutional rights have been abridged has a direct claim against the State under our Constitution.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Looney v. United States
See Cash v. United States, 961 F.2d 562, 565 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 492 , 121 L.Ed.2d 430 (1992); Hornsby, 588 F.2d at 954 ; see also Dallin ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldston v. State
(2×)
See Lewis v. White, 287 N.C. 625, 644-45 , 216 S.E.2d 134, 146-47 (1975) (holding that citizens could bring an action to prevent the construction of a "Cultural Complex" with tax funds appropriated solely for the purpose of building an art museum), superseded on other grounds by statute, North Carolina Environmental Policy Act of 1971, codified as N.C.G.S. § §§ 113A-1 to -10, as recognized in Corum v. Univ. of N.C., 330 N.C. 761, 786 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 292 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 493 , 121 L.Ed.2d 431 (1992); Shaw v. City of Asheville, 269 N.C. 90, 95-96 , 152 S.E.2d 139, 14…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Stumbo
(2×)
See Corum v. University of North Carolina, 330 N.C. 761, 783 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 290 (1992) (stating that the judiciary's "obligation to protect the fundamental rights of individuals is as old as the State"), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 493 , 121 L.Ed.2d 431 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Bacon v. Lee
See Corum v. University of North Carolina, 330 N.C. 761 , 413 S.E.2d 276 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Andrews v. Crump
See Corum v. University of North Carolina, 330 N.C. 761, 772 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 283 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Arnold v. Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. (In Re Arnold)
See Oklahoma v. Crook, 966 F.2d 539 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 491 , 121 L.Ed.2d [430] (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Teleflex Information Systems, Inc. v. Arnold
See Corum v. University of North Carolina, 330 N.C. 761, 782 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 289 , reh’g denied, 331 N.C. 558 , 418 S.E.2d 664 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 S.E.2d 431 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Price v. Davis
See Corum v. University of North Carolina, 330 N.C. 761, 771 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 282-83 , reh’g denied, 331 N.C. 558 , 418 S.E.2d 664 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.Ed.2d 431 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
California v. Deep Sea Research, Inc.
(2×)
See Zych v. Wrecked Vessel Believed to be the Lady Elgin, 960 F. 2d 665 , 670 (CA7), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 985 (1992); Maritime Underwater Surveys, Inc. v. The Unidentified, Wrecked and Abandoned Sailing Vessel, 717 F. 2d 6, 8 (CA1 1983). [*] We granted certiorari to address whether a State's Eleventh Amendment immunity in an in rem admiralty action depends upon evidence of the State's ownership of the res, and to consider the related *501 questions whether the Brother Jonathan is subject to the ASA and whether the ASA pre-empts § 6313. 520 U. S. 1263 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chandler v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission (In Re Chandler)
(2×)
See Walker, 142 F.3d at 821-24; Collins, 173 F.3d at 928-30 ; Antonelli, 123 F.3d at 787 ; see also In re Crook, 966 F.2d 539 , 541-42 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 491 , 121 L.Ed.2d 430 (1992). 4 This limitation on the definition of a suit in bankruptcy is necessary to prevent the States from undermining the bankruptcy system, and is supported by longstanding law related to the bankruptcy courts’ ability to enter orders fundamental to the bankruptcy process, such as discharge orders. 5 Yet, as desirable as this limitation on the definition of a suit may be, we recogniz…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kephart Ex Rel. Tutwiler v. Pendergraph
See, e.g., Corum v. University of North Carolina, 330 N.C. 761, 785-86 , 413 S.E.2d 276, 291-92 (defense of sovereign immunity does not apply to state constitutional claims), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fairport International Exploration, Inc. v. the Shipwrecked Vessel
See e.g., Zych v. Wrecked Vessel Believed to be SB “Lady Elgin”, 960 F.2d 665, 670 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 985 , 113 S.Ct. 491 , 121 L.Ed.2d 430 (1992); Sindia Expedition, Inc. v. Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, Known as “The Sindia", 895 F.2d 116, 122 (3rd Cir.1990); Fitzgerald v. Unidentified Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, 866 F.2d 16, 17 (1st Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Espelita
v.
Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
v.
Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 91-8745.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1992.
506 U.S. 985
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.