green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.4 score
“an employee benefit plan cannot be modified, however, by informal communications regardless of whether those communications are oral or written.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert W.. Smith v. National Credit Union Administration Board
an employee benefit plan cannot be modified, however, by informal communications regardless of whether those communications are oral or written.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smith v. National Credit Union Administration Board
an employee benefit plan cannot be modified, however, by informal communications regardless of whether those communications are oral or written
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Town of Orangetown v. Magee
Such claims are not ripe for judicial review until (1) the governmental entity charged with implementing the regulations has rendered a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the property, and (2) the landowner has availed itself of the procedures provided by State law to obtain just compensation (Williamson, supra, at 194, 200 ; Southview, supra, at 96).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dougherty v. Town Of North Hempstead Board Of Zoning Appeals
See Southview Assocs., Ltd. v. Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84 , 96-97 (2d Cir.1992) (substantive due process), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993); Unity Ventures v. County of Lake, 841 F.2d 770, 774-76 (7th Cir.) (equal protection and substantive and procedural due process), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S.Ct. 226 , 102 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1494 (9th Cir.1987) (equal protection and substantive due process), amended by 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dougherty v. Town of North Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals
See South- view Assocs., Ltd. v. Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84 , 96-97 (2d Cir.1992) (substantive due process), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993); Unity Ventures v. County of Lake, 841 F.2d 770, 774-76 (7th Cir.) (equal protection and substantive and procedural due process), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S.Ct. 226 , 102 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 F.2d 1488, 1494 (9th Cir.1987) (equal protection and substantive due process), amended by 857 F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 S.Ct. 1557 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lefler v. United Healthcare of Utah, Inc.
(2×)
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622, 624-25 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terrence F. Shields v. Local 705, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Plan
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622, 625 (10th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 (1993); cf. Nachwalter v. Christie, 805 F.2d 956, 957 (11th Cir. 1986) (holding that estoppel cannot be used to modify the written terms of an ERISA plan).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shields v. Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Plan
(2×)
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622, 625 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993); cf. Nachwalter v. Christie, 805 F.2d 956, 957 (11th Cir.1986) (holding that estoppel cannot be used to modify the written terms of an ERISA plan).
cited
Cited "see"
Riley v. Town of Bethlehem
See Southview As-socs., Ltd. v. Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84 , 102-03 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
DeLeon v. Little
See Oladeinde v. City of Birmingham, 963 F.2d 1481, 1486 (11th Cir.1992) (transfer, which involves no loss of pay and no loss of rank, does not deprive a plaintiff of a protected property interest), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993); Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1205 (3d Cir.1988) Defendant’s specific requests, (employment decisions which do not terminate or abridge the employment contract and which could be litigated in state tribunals do not constitute deprivations of property interests under the Fourteenth Amendment).
cited
Cited "see"
Cedarwood Land Planning v. Town of Schodack
See Southview Associates, Ltd. v. Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84, 95 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Talladega City Board Of Education
See Oladeinde v. City of Birmingham, 963 F.2d 1481, 1487 (11th Cir.1992) (concluding, without citing a materially similar case, that application of the balancing test in that case would lead to the "inevitable conclusion" that defendants violated the Constitution) (Edmondson, J.), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993). 30 It is, therefore, misleading to speak of a separate category of cases in which there is no "bright-line" rule that "puts the reasonable public [official] on notice of a constitutional violation," but in which the official is nonetheless not enti…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Talladega City Board of Education
See Oladeinde v. City of Birmingham, 963 F.2d 1481, 1487 (11th Cir.1992) (concluding, without citing a materially similar case, that application of the balancing test in that case would lead to the “inevitable conclusion” that defendants violated the Constitution) (Edmondson, J.), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Talladega City Bd. of Ed
See Oladeinde v. City of Birmingham, 963 F.2d 1481, 1487 (11th Cir.1992) (concluding, without citing a materially similar case, that application of the balancing test in that case would lead to the "inevitable conclusion" that defendants violated the Constitution) (Edmondson, J.), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 1194 [ (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 831 , 110 S.Ct. 101 , 107 L.Ed.2d 65 (1989) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1403, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23926e Leo W. Chiles, Gloria Herren, Helen L. Byrd, Joy L. Oleo, Phyllis McMillan Robert D. Hunter, Barbara Jeffries, Glorice Biglow, Jacqueline Steele v. Ceridian Corporation Seagate Technologies, Foreign Corporations
(2×)
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622 (10th Cir.1992) (informal communications to employees do not modify unambiguous contradictory terms in written plan documents), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993); Straub v. Western Union Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chiles v. Ceridian Corporation
(2×)
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622 (10th Cir.1992) (informal communications to employees do not modify unambiguous contradictory terms in written plan documents), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987, 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993); Straub v. Western Union Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
District 65 Retirement Trust for Members of the Bureau of Wholesale Sales Representatives v. Prudential Securities, Inc.
Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see Oladeinde v. Birmingham, 963 F.2d 1481 , 1485 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
IBI Security Service, Inc. v. National Westminster Bank USA (In Re IBI Security Service, Inc.)
See Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, 970 F.2d 1138 , 1147 (2d Cir.1992) (“The proper interpretation of a contract is a question of law for the court.”), cert. de *670 nied, — U.S. --, 113 S.Ct. 1585 , 123 L.Ed.2d 151 (1993); Network Publishing Corp. v. Shapiro, 895 F.2d 97, 99 (2d Cir. 1990); Antilles S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
William J. Elmore Wayne Comer, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Cone Mills Corporation Cone Mills Acquisition Corporation Dewey L. Trogdon Lacy G. Baynes, and Paul W. Stephanz Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, Amicus Curiae (Three Cases). William J. Elmore Wayne Comer, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Cone Mills Corporation Cone Mills Acquisition Corporation Dewey L. Trogdon Lacy G. Baynes, and Paul W. Stephanz Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, Amicus Curiae
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.
See Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622 (10th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. Albright
See, e.g., Oladeinde v. City of Birmingham, 963 F.2d 1481, 1485 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993); Arnold v. Board of Educ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zapata-Ibarra
See, e.g., United States v. Ramirez-Lujan, 976 F.2d 930 , 934 & n. 4 (5th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1587 , 123 L.Ed.2d 153 (1993); United States v. De Leon-Reyna, 930 F.2d 396, 399-402 (5th Cir.1991) (en banc); United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830, 840, 846 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981) (arresting officer’s good faith and reasonable but erroneous construction of statute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arocho v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Miller v. Coastal Corp., 978 F.2d 622, 624-25 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 987 , 113 S.Ct. 1586 , 123 L.Ed.2d 152 (1993); Peckham v. Gem State Mut. of Utah, 964 F.2d 1043, 1050 (10th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stutchin v. Town of Huntington
In the seminal case of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 , 105 S.Ct. 3108 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985), the Supreme Court instructed that plaintiffs must demonstrate they have both received a “final decision regarding the application of the [challenged] regulations to the property at issue” from “the government entity charged with implementing the regulations,” id. at 186 , 105 S.Ct. 3108 , and sought “compensation through the procedures the State has provided for doing so,” id. at 194 , 105 S.Ct. 3108 ; see also Southview Assocs…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hybud Equipment Corp.
v.
Sphere Drake Insurance Co., Ltd.
v.
Sphere Drake Insurance Co., Ltd.
No. 92-1260.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · Eleventh Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.