green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Harris v. Joint School District No. 241
The district court’s reliance on a denial of certiorari of the second Jones decision, see — U.S. at —, 113 S.Ct. at 2950 (denying certiorari to review Jones, 977 F.2d at 963 ), involves the same sort of speculation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Phyllis Wright Harris, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Three Children Beverly Harris Butler, Formerly Beverly Harris Samuel Harris v. Joint School District No. 241 Board of Trustees of District No. 241 Trent Woods, Chairperson of Board Al Arnzen, Superintendent v. Citizens Preserving America's Heritage, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees
The district court's reliance on a denial of certiorari of the second Jones decision, see --- U.S. at ----, 113 S.Ct. at 2950 (denying certiorari to review Jones, 977 F.2d at 963 ), involves the same sort of speculation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Colleton County Council v. McConnell
(2×)
See Statewide Reapportionment Advisory Comm. v. Theodore, 508 U.S. 968 , 113 S.Ct. 2954 , 125 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Satter v. Class
See Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486, 1490-91 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 967 , 113 S.Ct. 2950 , 124 L.Ed.2d 697 (1993) (prisoner fairly presented claim to state court by referring to due process and citing state cases employing constitutional analysis); see also, Graham v. Solem, 728 F.2d 1533 , 1536 & n. 4 (8th Cir.) (references to constitutional issue of “guilt by association” and the right to "cross examination” and of "compulsory process” sufficient to exhaust claims), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 842 , 105 S.Ct. 148 , 83 L.Ed.2d 86 (1984); see also, Williams v. Lord, 996 F.2d 1481…
discussed
Cited "see"
Statewide Reapportionment Advisory Committee William Gibson, Doctor Frederick Calhoun James, Bishop Herbert Williams, Reverend Willie B. Owens South Carolina Conference of the Naacp Branches v. David M. Beasley, in His Official Capacity as Governor of South Carolina David H. Wilkins, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives, the South Carolina Senate, Intervenor. Michael G. Burton, as Executive Director on Behalf of the Republican Party William P. Collins, III Earl Copeland William Patrick Flack Frank E. Gibson, III Nancy D. Hawk Gus Roberts v. David M. Beasley, in His Official Capacity as Governor of South Carolina David H. Wilkins, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives, the South Carolina Senate, Intervenor
(2×)
See Burton v. Sheheen, 793 F.Supp. 1329 (D.S.C.1992), vacated, Statewide Reapportionment Advisory Comm. v. Theodore, 508 U.S. 968 , 113 S.Ct. 2954 , 125 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993), and Campbell v. Theodore, 508 U.S. 968 , 113 S.Ct. 2954 , 125 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993). 4 In January 1992, the South Carolina Governor, Carroll A. Campbell, Jr., vetoed the plans passed by the General Assembly, requesting a plan with more majority black districts.
examined
Cited "see"
Statewide Reapportionment Advisory Committee v. Beasley
(4×)
See Burton v. Sheheen, 793 F. Supp. 1329 (D.S.C. 1992), vacated, Statewide Reapportionment Comm. v. Theodore, 508 U.S. 968 (1993), and Campbell v. Theodore, 508 U.S. 968 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. State Board of Elections
See Statewide Reapportionment Advisory Comm. v. Theodore, 508 U.S. 968 , 113 S.Ct. 2954 , 125 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993) (where the Court adopted the position advanced by the Solicitor General that the three judge panel had given inadequate consideration to and made inadequate findings concerning § 2 of the Voting Rights Act and remanded the case for further development of the record in accordance with the points raised in the Solicitor General’s amicus brief). 57 .
cited
Cited "see"
Randolph K. Reeves v. Frank X. Hopkins
See Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2950 . . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Randolph K. Reeves, Appellee/appellant v. Frank X. Hopkins, Warden of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, Appellant/appellee
(2×)
See Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 967 , 113 S.Ct. 2950 , 124 L.Ed.2d 697 ....
cited
Cited "see"
John J. Joubert v. Frank X. Hopkins
See id. (constitutional harmless error analysis entails de novo review of the record).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ryan
See Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied 508 U.S. 967 , 113 S. Ct. 2950 , 124 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Williams v. Harold W. Clarke
Rev.Stat. § 29-2520; see Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486, 1493 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2950 , 124 L.Ed.2d 697 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Elbert Whaley Jones v. Gary Jerrison, Parole Officer Cranston Mitchell, Board of Probation and Parole and the Attorney General of Missouri
See Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486, 1491 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2950 , 124 L.Ed.2d 697 (1993); Cox v. Lockhart, 970 F.2d 448, 453-54 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Inkelaar
Compare Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 , reh. denied 508 U.S. 968 , 113 S.Ct. 2951 , 124 L.Ed.2d 698 (1993) (quoting Chapman, 386 U.S. at 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , and explaining Chapman standard means relief from error is required "merely because there is a `"reasonable possibility"' that trial error contributed to the verdict"), with State v. Bailey, 292 Kan. 449, 455 , 255 P.3d 19 (2011) (explaining K.S.A. 22-3414[3] requires party who fails to object to jury instruction to establish jury instruction is "clearly erroneous," which means reviewing court m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. West
As to the standard of review for harmless constitutional error in a criminal case, the Supreme Court stated there: “[Bjefore a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824 ; see also Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 630 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) (noting that in Chapman the Supreme Court had “rejected the argument that the Constitution requires a blanket rule of automatic reversal in the case of constitutional error”), reh’g denied, 508 U.S. 968…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rickman v. Dutton
See also Rust v. Hopkins, 984 F.2d 1486, 1493 (8th Cir.1993) (deprivation of state-created liberty interest in having panel of judges determine proper weight to be given aggravating circumstances based on facts proven beyond reasonable doubt not curable by appellate review), cert. denied, 508 U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2950 , 124 L.Ed.2d 697 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sever
v.
IBM Corp.
v.
IBM Corp.
No. 92-8309.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1993.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.