green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The speedy trial requirements should not operate to reward a recalcitrant and reluctant defendant”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Smith
the speedy trial requirements should not operate to reward a recalcitrant and reluctant defendant
cited
Cited "see"
John Gilbert Freeman, Sr. v. James Upchurch, Warden Attorney General for the State of Arizona
See United States v. Aguirre, 994 F.2d 1454, 1456 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1029 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Falcon
See United States v. Aguirre, 994 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir.1993) (noting that the “Aguirre’s acquiescence in the delay, despite his knowledge of the outstanding indictment, is ... a reason to place the burden of proving prejudice on him”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1029 , 114 S.Ct. 645 , 126 L.Ed.2d 603 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson and Coker, Inc. v. Lynam
See Dunn v. HOVIC, 1 F.3d 1362, 1364 (3d Cir.1993), modified on other grounds, 13 F.3d 58 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 650 , — L.Ed.2d - — , 62 U.S.L.W. 3409 (U.S. Dec. 13, 1993); Klein v. Hollings, 992 F.2d 1285, 1290 (3d Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vaneenwyk
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 995 F.2d 776, 778 (7th Cir.) (address book was lawfully seized from defendant’s person as part of search incident to arrest), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1029 , 114 S.Ct. 648 , 126 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); United States v. Holzman, 871 F.2d 1496, 1504-05 (9th Cir.1989) (arresting officer legitimately examined address book discovered during search incident to arrest and determined that it contained “a bunch of names and numbers,” and subsequent, more thorough search of book’s contents was also valid), overruled on other grounds, Horton v. California, 496 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bascom O'quinn, United States of America v. Ronnie Dale Blevins
Compare United States v. Spiropoulous, 976 F.2d 155 (3d Cir.1992) (holding that costs of imprisonment may not be assessed under Sec. 5E1.2 due to lack of statutory authorization), with United States v. Turner, 998 F.2d 534 (7th Cir.) (sentencing Commission has statutory authority to assess costs under Sec. 5E1.2), cert. denied, 62 U.S.L.W. 3409 (U.S.1993) 4 If O'Quinn or Blevins cannot make the monthly installments when they are on supervised release, the condition would be more restrictive than necessary to effectuate the purposes of sentencing.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mathews
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-6692.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
Mathews
v.
United States.
No. 93-6692.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 13, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 997 F. 2d 848.