green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Plainview Texas, William Mull, in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Plainview Police Department, and Ken Coughlin, Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Plainview Police Department v. Korey Ferguson
See City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 473 U.S. 432, 440 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 3254–55, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 (1985); Clajon Production Corp. v. Petera, 70 F.3d 1566 , F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 1580 (10th Cir.1995); see also City of New Orleans v. Dukes, F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 427 U.S. 297 , 303–04, 96 S.Ct. 2513 , 2516–17, 49 L.Ed.2d S. Ct. 1557, 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). 511 (1976); Barshop v. Medina …
discussed
Cited "see"
Cain v. Ryan
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 162 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rosser v. Chrysler Corp., 864 F.2d 1299, 1304 (7th Cir.1988). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1670 Irmgard Lipcon Mitchell Lipcon Charles R. Lipcon Barbara Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, A.K.A. Corporation of Lloyd's, A.K.A. Society of Lloyd's, A.K.A. Lloyd's of London
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd's, 3 F.3d 156, 162 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
(2×)
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 162 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alan Richards v. Lloyd's of London, an Unincorporated Association, John R. Norton, III Doris S. Norton Diane B. Allison Charles G. Bentzin F.M. Binkley Delmar A. Brady Samme Jo Brady George Maning Close Russell M. Collins Peter Dwares Robert Flesvig Donald P. Gallop Charles A. Gerlach, Jr. Robert W. Gerwig Richard C. Henry Michael C. Hirsh R. William Johnston James H. Kayian Joanne S. Kayian-Olooney Suzanne Kayian Lowell Conrad Lundell Judith M. Ott H.E. Rainbolt David L. Rosenblatt Ray Morse Sanderson Claire Tillman Warren G. Vander Voort Peter Beck Harold Franz Ilg John C. Griffin Ted Kosloff Francis J. Milon Glen R. Mogan Melanie M. Norton Joseph F. Weller v. Lloyd's of London, an Unincorporated Association Corporation of Lloyd's, AKA Society of Lloyd's, AKA the Society and Council of Lloyd's
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd's, 3 F.3d 156, 160-61 (7th Cir.1993) (expressing "serious concerns" that the choice clauses offend public policy but ultimately ruling in Lloyd's favor), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd's, 996 F.2d 1353, 1364-66 (2nd Cir.) (substantially the same), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 333 (1993). 27 We follow our six sister circuits that have ruled to enforce the choice clauses.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richards v. Lloyd's of London
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 160-61 (7th Cir.1993) (expressing “serious concerns” that the choice clauses offend public policy but ultimately ruling in Lloyd’s favor), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 996 F.2d 1353, 1364-66 (2nd Cir.) (substantially the same), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 333 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, Minnesota
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir.1993), cert. *1072 denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Bituminous Materials v. Rice County, MN
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
The Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Technologies, Inc.
See Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 998 F.2d 575, 578-79 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); City of Mt.
cited
Cited "see"
Corner Pocket v. Video Lottery
See -3- Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 998 F.2d 575, 578-79 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 (1994); City of Mt.
cited
Cited "see"
Masepohl v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's
Accord Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156 , 160 n. 10 (7th Cir.1993) (“Nothing excuses the plaintiffs for not being aware of the substantive provisions of English law that the forum selection clause incorporates into their agreement.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); West, Tr. at 132 (finding nothing “would justify failure to read this one-and-a-half-page document which in itself is quite simple”); see also Castro v. Marine Midland Bank, 695 F.Supp. 1548, 1551 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (rejecting claim that arbitration clause was induced by fraud whe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melia v. Zenhire, Inc.
See, e.g., Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 160-161 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 (1994) (Federal securities laws); Wimsatt v. Beverly Hills Weight Loss Clinics Int’l, Inc., 32 Cal. App. 4th 1511, 1520-1521 (1995) (State franchise investment law). “ ‘Public policy’ in this context refers to a court’s conviction, grounded in legislation and precedent, that denying enforcement of a contractual term is necessary to protect some aspect of the public welfare.” Beacon Hill Civic Ass’n v. Ristorante Toscano, Inc., 422 Mass. 318, 321 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Broussard v. Stolt Offshore, Inc.
Additionally, a corporate shipowner “may be deemed to have constructive knowledge if the unseaworthy or negligent condition could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence.” Brister, 946 F.2d at 356 ; see also Cupit v. McClanahan Contractors, Inc., 1 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir.1993) (“ ‘Privity or knowledge,’ sometimes described as ‘complicity in the fault,’ extends beyond actual knowledge to knowledge that the ship owner would have obtained by reasonable investigation.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 *676 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), *940 cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
See, e.g., Schulmerich Carillons, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 154 Pa.Cmwlth. 343 , 623 A.2d 921 , appeal denied, 535 Pa. 642 , 631 A.2d 1013 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another). 58 Plaintiffs have not presented evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact on their civil conspiracy claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida Seed Co. v. Monsanto Co.
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518 (8th Cir.1992), rev’d, in part, 998 F.2d 575 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 450 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Harris v. Shell Oil Co., 371 F.Supp. 376, 377 (M.D.Ala.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
1997-1 Trade Cases P 71,721, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 710 Florida Seed Company, Inc., a Corporation, Frit Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants v. Monsanto Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518 (8th Cir.1992), rev'd in part, 998 F.2d 575 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 450 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Harris v. Shell Oil Co., 371 F.Supp. 376, 377 (M.D.Ala.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County
As an illustration of a "truly irrational" ordinance, the Chesterfield court described it as one "applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the ~`lrst half of the alphabet." Chesterfield, 963 F.2d at 1104 ; See also Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)(applying "truly irrational" standard to federal substantive due process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County
As an illustration of a "truly irrational" ordinance, the Chesterfield court described it as one "applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the first half of the alphabet." Chesterfield, 963 F.2d at 1104 ; See also Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)(applying "truly irrational" standard to federal substantive due process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ashenden v. Lloyd's of London
See, e.g., Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 158-62 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 996 F.2d 1353, 1362-63 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 333 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
Douglas County, Minnesota
v.
Douglas County, Minnesota
93-923.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
Published
Anderson
v.
Douglas County, Minnesota, et al.
No. 93-923.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 F. 3d 574.