green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 8× by 2 distinct cases ·
"Jeffries III "
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“There are numerous criminal statutes providing for criminal liability where the mens rea is ‘reason to know.’ ”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. One 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe, VIN 1GNEC13K3SJ398583
But see United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37, 55 (2nd Cir. Í 993) (acknowledging that the district court held two pretrial probable cause hearings), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1294 , 127 L.Ed.2d 648 (1994).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Lefevre
there are numerous criminal statutes providing for criminal liability where the mens rea is 'reason to know.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, Superintendent
(2×)
jeffries iii
cited
Cited "see"
Fieldwork Boston, Inc. v. United States
See McGinnis v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 548, 551 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) (1988 & Supp.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hess
(2×)
See State v. Curl, 125 Idaho 224 , 869 P.2d 224 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994); Haley v. State, 696 N.E.2d 98 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); State v. Beeken, 7 Neb.App. 438 , 585 N.W.2d 865, 872 (1998) (dictum); State v. Wagoner, 126 N.M. 9 , 966 P.2d 176 (N.M.CtApp.), cert. denied, 125 N.M. 654 , 964 P.2d 818 (N.M.1998); State v. Ackerman, 499 N.W.2d 882 (N.D.1993); State v. Robinson, 103 Ohio App.3d 490 , 659 N.E.2d 1292 (1995); State v. Ramirez, 49 WashApp. 814, 746 P.2d 344 (1987). [¶ 28.]To understand the distinction between serious and minor offenses, …
discussed
Cited "see"
Pineda v. City of Houston
See State v. Curl, 125 Idaho 224 , 869 P.2d 224 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 646 (1994); Haley v. State, 696 N.E.2d 98 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); State v. Beeken, 7 Neb.App. 438, 585 N.W.2d 865, 872 (1998); State v. Wagoner, 126 N.M. 9 , 966 P.2d 176 (1998), cert. denied, 125 N.M. 654 , 964 P.2d 818 (1998); State v. Ackerman, 499 N.W.2d 882 (N.D.1993); State v. Robinson, 103 Ohio App.3d 490 , 659 N.E.2d 1292 (1995); State v. Steelman, 16 S.W.3d 483 (Tex.App. — Eastland 2000, petition for discretionary review granted Sept. 27, 2000), State v. Ramirez, 49 Wash. Ap…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holland
See State v. Curl, 125 Idaho 224 , 869 P. 2d 224 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed. 2d 646 (1994); Haley v. State, 696 N.E. 2d 98 (Ind.Ct.App.1998); State v. Beeken, 7 Neb.App. 438 , 585 N.W. 2d 865, 872 (1998) (dictum); State v. Wagoner, 126 N.M. 9 , 966 P. 2d 176 (Ct.App.), certif. denied, 125 N.M. 654 , 964 P. 2d 818 (1998); State v. Ackerman, 499 N.W. 2d 882 (N.D. 1993); State v. Robinson, 103 Ohio App. 3d 490 , 659 N.E. 2d 1292 (1995); State v. Ramirez, 49 Wash.App. 814 , 746 P. 2d 344 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
John H. Nix v. Patrick J. O'Malley Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley
See United States v. Wuliger, 981 F.2d 1497, 1506 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994); see also United States v. Murdock, 63 F.3d 1391, 1400 (6th Cir.1995) (refusing to expand Title Ill’s “extension telephone” exemption to cover interception by former spouse), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1187 , 116 S.Ct. 1672 , 134 L.Ed.2d 776 (1996); Fultz, 942 F.2d at 400-02 (rejecting an implied “single publication” limit to Title III, finding actionable each disclosure to a different third party).
discussed
Cited "see"
Organizacion Jd Ltda. And Manufacturas Jd Ltda. v. United States Department of Justice and United States Drug Enforcement Administration
See United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1295 , 127 L.Ed.2d 648 (1994); Organi-zacion JD Ltda. v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 18 F.3d 91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perez v. Marshall
See Jeffries v. Blodgett, 5 F.3d 1180, 1189-90 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1294 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994) (question on habeas is whether juror misconduct deprived defendant of his or her right to fair trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
NIKKI LEADER v. SCHOOL BOARD OF THE PARISH OF LIVINGSTON, LOUISIANA; J. ROGERS POPE; AND J. LLOYD WAX
See McGinnis v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 548 , 550 n.1 (5th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994) (noting that Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associated Limited Partnership, 507 U.S. 380 , 113 S.Ct. 1489 , 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993), did not change the standard of good cause under FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gabriel v. United National Insurance
See Systems Signs Supplies v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington D.C., 903 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir.1990); see also McGinnis v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 548, 550 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. One 2004 Audi Sedan Automobile
See also United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37, 47 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , and cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1192 , and cert, denied, 511 U.S. 1030 (“The complaint does not have to meet the ultimate trial burden of showing probable cause for forfeiture; it simply needs to establish a ‘reasonable belief that the government can show probable cause for forfeiture at trial’ ”); United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1127 (11th Cir. 1996). 6 Further, two Supreme Judicial Court decisions, although not directly on point, are helpful to our analysis.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. $87,118.00 in United States Currency and $3,490.00 in United States Currency, Appeal Of: Abiodun Oloko
See United States v. Real Property Known and Numbered as Rural Route 1, Box 137-B, Cutler, Ohio, 24 F.3d 845, 848 (6th Cir.1994) (holding that court " 'must examine the entire record, including evidence developed after the seizure,’ ") (quoting United States v. $67,220.00 in U.S. Currency, 957 F.2d 280, 283 (6th Cir.1992)); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 4492 S. Livonia Rd., 889 F.2d 1258, 1268 (2d Cir.1989) (holding that, although the government cannot start a forfeiture proceeding "in bad faith ... based on the hope that something will turn up to justify its suit, ... [o]nc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnett Bank of Broward County v. Tussing (In re Tussing)
Kirkland, 86 F.3d at 176 ; see also McGinnis v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 548, 550 (5th Cir.1993) (stating that inadvertanee, mistake, or neglect of counsel do not constitute “good cause”), rehearing denied, 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994); Braxton v. United States, 817 F.2d 238, 241-42 (3rd Cir.1987) (stating that neither inadvertence of counsel nor half-hearted attempts at service amount to “good cause” under former Rule 4(j) in holding that the “unexplained delinquency on the part of the process server and lack of oversight by…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abuchaibe Hnos. Ltda.
v.
United States and Abuchaibe Hnos. Ltda. v. Banco Atlantico S. A.
v.
United States and Abuchaibe Hnos. Ltda. v. Banco Atlantico S. A.
93-1018.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
510 U.S. 1191
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · Court of Appeals of Arizona (1)
Abuchaibe Hnos. Ltda.
v.
United States et al.; and
Abuchaibe Hnos. Ltda.
v.
Banco Atlantico S. A. et al.
No. 93-1018.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 21, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 93-1002 and Nos. 93-1018, 93-1019, 93-1020, 93-1061, and 93-1073 (first cases), 6 F. 3d 37.