green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Studebaker v. Uribe
See Hunter v. Aispuro, 982 F.2d 344, 347-48 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 114 S.Ct. 240 , 126 L.Ed.2d 194 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Castillo v. Clark
See Hunter v. Aispuro, 982 F.2d 344, 348 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 114 S.Ct. 240 , 126 L.Ed.2d 194 (1993) 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nickerson v. Roe
See Hunter v. Aispuro, 982 F.2d 344, 348 (9th Cir.1992) (where a summary denial by the California Supreme Court includes a citation to state authority indicating that the habeas petition was procedurally deficient, the order represents a procedural disposition rather than a decision on the merits), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 114 S.Ct. 240 , 126 L.Ed.2d 194 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
See United States v. Goines, 988 F.2d 750, 775 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 114 S.Ct. 241 , 126 L.Ed.2d 195 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nilesh Patel, Also Known as Nick Patel
See United States v. Goines, 988 F.2d 750, 777 (7th Cir.) (vacating sentences and remanding for proper findings where defendants apparently raised no objection to the court’s findings but disputed the PSR’s drug quantity determinations throughout a lengthy sentencing hearing), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 982, 995, 114 S.Ct. 241 , 483, 558, 126 L.Ed.2d 195 , 433, 458 (1993); see also United States v. Bauer, 19 F.3d 409, 413 (8th Cir.1994) (although the defendant should have specifically objected to the lack of findings to support the imposition of a fine under U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2, he adequat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dort
Compare State v. DesLaurier, supra, 588 (noting that ‘‘[t]he trial court reasonably could have afforded little weight to the assertion of the defendant’s counsel about the defen- dant’s ‘irrational behavior’ during a private conversation because his bare opinion, without any further detail about the date, duration, frequency or actual behavior involved in the conduct, presented only a legal conclu- sion about the defendant’s competency to stand trial and failed to assert facts from which the trial court could make its own legal determination concerning the defendant’s competenc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkinson, Mark v. Cowan, Roger D.
See generally Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 , 109 S. Ct. 1038 (1989); see also, e.g., Hunter v. Aispuro, 982 F.2d 344, 347-48 (9th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 114 S. Ct. 240 (1993); Lewis v. Borg, 879 F.2d 697, 698 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); cf. Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 740 , 111 S. Ct. 2546, 2559 (1991) (procedural default found where state supreme court granted State’s motion to dismiss petition to appeal as untimely, as opposed to denying petition)./1 At this juncture, we believe it appropriate to return the case to the district court to give that court the first …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark Wilkinson v. Roger D. Cowan, Warden
See generally Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 , 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989); see also, e.g., Hunter v. Aispuro, 982 F.2d 344, 347-48 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 887 , 114 S.Ct. 240 , 126 L.Ed.2d 194 (1993); Lewis v. Borg, 879 F.2d 697, 698 (9th Cir.1989) (per curiam); cf. Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 740 , 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2559 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991) (procedural default found where state supreme court granted State’s motion to dismiss petition to appeal as untimely, as opposed to denying petition). 1 At this juncture, we believe it appropriate to return the case to…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-5319.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Clark
v.
United States.
No. 93-5319.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 992 F. 2d 327.