Guzman v. United States, 510 U.S. 899 (1993). · Go Syfert
Guzman v. United States, 510 U.S. 899 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Artis (dc, 2005-09-08) · Strongest negative: United States Ex Rel. Hampton v. DeTella (ilnd, 1998-08-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States Ex Rel. Hampton v. DeTella
N.D. Ill. · 1998 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Gacy v. Welborn, 994 F.2d 305, 311 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (“Any claim sufficiently novel that it was unavailable during the state proceedings must be a ‘new rule’ under Teague.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 899 , 114 S.Ct. 269 , 126 L.Ed.2d 220 (1993).
examined Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Artis (4×)
D.C. · 2005 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
discovery in criminal trials, especially discovery of the defense case, is very limited because of the adversarial nature of criminal prosecutions.
discussed Cited "see" Hammond v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morris v. United States, 622 A.2d 1116, 1126-27 (D.C.) (citing with approval trial court's failure to admit other crimes evidence of third person to show propensity, but deciding question on other grounds), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 899 , 114 S.Ct. 270 , 126 L.Ed.2d 221 (1993). 22 .
discussed Cited "see" McCoy v. United States (2×)
D.C. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morris v. United States, 622 A.2d 1116, 1128 (D.C.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 899 , 114 S.Ct. 270 , 126 L.Ed.2d 221 (1993) (trial court’s ruling excluding evidence results in little, if any prejudice, where much of it gets before the jury).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Carl Green, Movant
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gacy v. Welborn, 994 F.2d 305, 310-11 (7th Cir.) (post-Teague, a petitioner who argues that his claim was novel [lacked a reasonable basis in law] in order to establish cause, merely pleads himself out of court because such a claim must also be a “new rule” under Teague ), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 899 , 114 S.Ct. 269 , 126 L.Ed.2d 220 (1993); Selvage v. Collins, 975 F.2d 131, 135 (5th Cir.1992) (“Since a claim that lacks a ‘reasonable basis’ plainly is not ‘dictated" by precedent,’ a petitioner that meets the cause requirement cannot receive the benefit of the rule”), cert. d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guzman
v.
United States
93-5569.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 899

510 U.S. 899

Guzman
v.
United States.

No. 93-5569.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 990 F. 2d 1262.