green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Blaik v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d 916, 928-29 (5th Cir.) (upholding restitution to all victims irrespective of the counts of conviction under the rationale that all losses caused by a fraudulent scheme satisfy the specific conduct requirement of Hughey ), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 , and cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993); United States v. Brothers, 955 F.2d 493, 497 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 847 , 113 S.Ct. 142 , 121 L.Ed.2d 94 (1992). of an offense" for "any victim of such offense." 18 U.S.C. § 3663 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodman v. State
(2×)
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672-73 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993); Royster v. State, 622 S.W.2d 442, 446 (Tex.Crim.App.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672-75 (Tex.Crim.App.) (discussing the extensive Texas case law recognizing and applying this two-pronged standard), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993). 188 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. State
(2×)
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993); Bell v. State, 693 S.W.2d 434, 442 (Tex.Crim.App.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Edward Sharp v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 681 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Edward Sharp v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 681 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Edward Sharp v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 681 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Levan v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex.Cr.App.), ce rt. den’d, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennsylvania State Police v. Grogan
(2×)
Accord United States v. Meeks, 987 F.2d 575 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cardenas v. State
(2×)
See id. (citing Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993)).
cited
Cited "see"
Garza v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 682 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Fuentes v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lasky
See United States v. Clements, 992 F.2d 417, 420 (2d Cir.) (“conditions imposed by the government are of sufficient importance that they should be stated to the court so that it can take them into consideration when inquiring into the voluntariness of the plea”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 316 , 126 L.Ed.2d 262 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of V.M.D.
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 673 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatto v. United States
See United States v. Clements, 992 F.2d 417, 419 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 316 , 126 L.Ed.2d 262 (1993); United States v. Seligsohn, 981 F.2d 1418, 1426 (3d Cir.1992); United States v. Pollard, 959 F.2d 1011, 1020-21 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 , 113 S.Ct. 322 , 121 L.Ed.2d 242 (1992); United States v. Marquez, 909 F.2d 738, 741-42 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1084 , 111 S.Ct. 957 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1991); Politte v. United States, 852 F.2d 924, 930-31 (7th Cir.1988); United States v. Wheat, 813 F.2d 1399, 1405 (9th Cir.1987), aff'd, 486 U.S. 153 , …
examined
Cited "see"
Arevalo v. State
(3×)
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672-673 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993); Aguilar v. State, 682 S.W.2d 556, 558 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Royster v. State, 622 S.W.2d 442, 446 (Tex.Crim.App.1981) (plurality op. on reh'g). .
cited
Cited "see"
Lavarry v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 673 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993); Lugo v. State, 667 S.W.2d 144, 147 (Tex.Crim.App.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Indelicato
Accord United States v. Meeks, 987 F.2d 575, 578 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Price v. Short
See Rousseau v. State, 824 S.W.2d 579 , 584 n. 9 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Dillard v. State
See Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 673 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lucarelli
(2×)
Bauer, 956 F.2d at 695 ; Allen, 895 F.2d at 1579 ; see also United States v. Meeks, 987 F.2d 575 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, [ 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993)]. 67 F.3d at 1100 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Feldman v. State
The first step is to decide whether the offense is actually a lesser-included offense of the offense charged. 4 See Art. 37.09; see also, e.g., Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993); Aguilar, 682 S.W.2d at 558 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ames v. United States
See also United States v. Clements, 992 F.2d 417, 419 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 316 , 126 L.Ed.2d 262 (1993); Harman v. Mohn, 683 F.2d 834 (4th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Tony v. Carruthers And James Montgomery
See also United States v. Meeks, 987 F.2d 575, 579 (9th Cir. 1993 ), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993) (citing Unite d State s v. Ke lm, 827 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir. 1987) and United States v. Leavitt, 608 F.2d 1 290 (9th Cir. 197 9) (“In limited circums tances, a cou rt may force a de fendan t to proceed pro se if his conduct is “‘dilatory and hinders the efficient admin istration of jus tice.’”)); United States v. Fazzini, 871 F.2d 635, 642 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S . 982, 110 S.Ct. 517 , 107 L.Ed.2d 518 (1989) (quoting United States v. Moo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. State
(2×)
See Schweinle v. State, 915 S.W.2d 17, 18 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); see also Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied., 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 313 , 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boykin
Id; see also United States v. Meeks, 987 F.2d 575 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993) (defendant’s continuing attempts to substitute counsel did not constitute waiver by conduct where the court did not warn the defendant of the dangers of proceeding pro se); United States v. Bauer, 956 F.2d 693 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 882 , 113 S.Ct. 234 , 121 L.Ed.2d 169 (1992) (finding waiver by conduct where defendant was warned of the dangers of self-representation, could afford to hire an attorney, but refused to do so); United States v. Allen, 895 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hardy
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-5226.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1993.
Published
Hardy
v.
United States.
No. 93-5226.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 12, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 990 F. 2d 1267.