green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Hambrick
(2×)
But see United States v. Gilliam, 994 F2d 97 (2nd Cir), cert den, 510 US 927 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Collier v. United States
See United States v. Gilliam, 994 F.2d 97, 100 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 335 , 126 L.Ed.2d 280 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ashbrook
(2×)
See generally United States v. Evans, 994 F.2d 317, 321 (7thCir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 335 , 126 L.Ed.2d 280 (1993)(when officers reasonably interpreted the defendant's actions as an attempt to conceal a weapon, a protective search was justified); United States v. Nash, 876 F.2d 1359 , *509 1361 (7thCir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 , 110 S.Ct. 1145 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990)(defendant's furtive gesture of raising himself up from the car seat and reaching toward the floor warranted vehicle search); Sutton v. State, 698 So.2d 1321, 1323 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1997)(Florida …
cited
Cited "see"
Goodall v. United States
See United States v. Gilliam, 994 F.2d 97, 101 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 335 , 126 L.Ed.2d 280 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Mangum
Accord United States v. Gilliam, 994 F.2d 97, 101-02 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 335 , 126 L.Ed.2d 280 (1993); United States v. Jacobs, 44 F.3d 1219, 1222 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1835 , 131 L.Ed.2d 754 (1995); United States v. Aleman, 609 F.2d 298, 310 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980); United States v. Barker, 1 F.3d 957, 959 (9th Cir.1993), modified, 20 F.3d 365 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Brinklow, 560 F.2d 1003, 1006 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1047 , 98 S.Ct. 893 , 54 L.Ed.2d 798 …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dickens
(2×)
See State v. Landrigan, 176 Ariz. 1, 4 , 859 P.2d 111, 114 , cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Michelle Rosenfeld v. Gerard Basquiat, as Administrator of the Estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat
See id. (citing United States v. Mejia-Alarcon, 995 F.2d 982, 986 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Martinez, Jr.
See United States v. Mejia-Alarcon, 995 F.2d 982 , 987 n. 2 (10th Cir.) (acknowledging that any pretrial rulings involving Rule 609(a)(1) are necessarily preliminary because the required balancing may be reassessed as the evidence actually comes in), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993); Luce, 469 U.S. at 41-42 , 105 S.Ct. at 463-64 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Spears
See State v. Landrigan, 176 Ariz. 1, 4 , 859 P.2d 111, 114 , cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James B. Kimball
See United States v. Mejia-Alarcon, 995 F.2d 982, 985-88 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hinchey
(2×)
See State v. Landrigan, 176 Ariz. 1, 6 , 859 P.2d 111, 116 (sentencer's discretion sufficiently channeled because statute narrowly defines class of death-eligible defendants), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993). 2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gardetto v. Mason
Evid. 103. -10- the court's ruling was definitive.” Id.; see also United States v. Mejia-Alarcon , 995 F.2d 982, 987-88 (10th Cir.) (establishing the rule), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 927 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shoney's, Inc. v. Barnett
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mejia-Alarcon, 995 F.2d 982 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 334 , 126 L.Ed.2d 279 (1993); Cree v. Hatcher, 969 F.2d 34 (3d Cir.1992); United States v. Brackeen, 969 F.2d 827 (9th Cir.1992); and United States v. Smith, 551 F.2d 348 (D.C.Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Earl
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Evans, 994 F.2d 317 (7th Cir. 1993)(upholding the search of a vehicle based on furtive movements as well as the defendant’s decision to park in front of a house known to be involved in drug trafficking), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 (1993); United States v. Richards, 967 F.2d 1189 (8th Cir. 1992) (upholding the search of the passenger compartment of a motor home when the defendant, who was a released felon, was nervous and when officers saw .22 caliber rifle cartridges on the floor); People v. Innis, 604 N.E.2d 389, 392 (Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Earl Atlas
(2×)
While the defendant's presence in a dangerous area is not by itself enough to raise a reasonable suspicion, "an area's propensity toward criminal activity is something that an officer may consider." United States v. Lender, 985 F.2d 151, 154 (4th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Evans, 994 F.2d 317, 322 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 , 114 S.Ct. 335 , 126 L.Ed.2d 280 (1993). 14 Most significantly, Atlas's reaction upon seeing Officer Reimer supports a determination of reasonable suspicion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Earl Atlas
While the defendant's presence in a dangerous area is not by itself enough to raise a reasonable suspicion, "an area's propensity toward criminal activity is something that an officer may consider." United States v. Lender, 985 F.2d 151, 154 (4th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Evans, 994 F.2d 317, 322 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 927 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robles
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-5888.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1993.
Published
Robles
v.
United States.
No. 93-5888.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 12, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 995 F. 2d 234.