green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Crummey v. Social Security Administration
See Kattan v. District of Columbia, 995 F.2d 274, 276 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 71 (1994); Secs. & Exch.
cited
Cited "see"
Webster v. Fulton County, Ga.
See Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 997 F.2d 1369, 1392 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1400 , 128 L.Ed.2d 73 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bannum v. City of Ft. Lauderdale
See Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 997 F.2d 1369, 1387 (11th Cir. 1993) (approving of “safety” and “effect on city services” as permissible bases for imposing land use restrictions), cert. denied, 7 511 U.S. 1018 (1994); see also Bannum, Inc. v. City of St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bannum, Inc. v. City of Fort Lauderdale
See Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 997 F.2d 1369, 1387 (11th Cir.1993) (approving of “safety” and “effect on city services” as permissible bases for imposing land use restrictions), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1400 , 128 L.Ed.2d 73 (1994); see also Bannum, Inc. v. City of St.
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Materials, Inc. v. City of Slidell
See Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 997 F.2d 1369, 1388, 1392 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1400 , 128 L.Ed.2d 73 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dao v. Knightsbridge International Reinsurance Corp.
See, e.g., Sundance Cruises Corp. v. American Bur. of Shipping, 7 F.3d 1077, 1081 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1399 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maxine GRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AFFILIATED CENTRAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See, e.g., LeBlanc v. Great American Insurance Co., 6 F.3d 836, 847 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Lowe v. J.B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farrell Lines Inc. v. Columbus Cello-Poly Corp.
“A federal court sitting in admiralty must apply federal choice of law rules.” State Trading Corp. of India v. As suranceforeningen Skuld, 921 F.2d 409, 414 (2d Cir.1990); see also Sundance Cruises Corp. v. American Bureau of Shipping, 7 F.3d 1077, 1080 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1399 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norton v. Corrales, Village Of
In short, the doctrine of substantive due process is a constitutionally imposed limitation, which is intended only to prevent government from abusing [its] power, or employing it as an instrument of oppression. 18 Id. at 827-28 (citations and quotations omitted); see also Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 997 F.2d 1369, 1374 (11th Cir.1993) ("First, it must be determined whether there has been a deprivation of a federal constitutionally protected interest, and secondly, whether the deprivation, if any, is the result of an abuse of governmental power sufficient to raise an ordinary tort to the …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LeBlanc
v.
Great American Insurance Co.
v.
Great American Insurance Co.
No. 93-1297.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1994.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.