green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
STATE EX REL. MARSHALL CTY. COM'N v. Carter
See Wilt v. Buracker, 191 W.Va. 39, 44 , 443 S.E.2d 196, 201 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2137 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994) (citing the United States Supreme Court's determination that the Frye rule, Frye v. United States, 54 App.D.C. 46 , 293 F. 1013 (1923), was inconsistent with Rule 702).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Marshall County County Commission v. Carter
See Wilt v. Buracker, 191 W.Va. 39, 44 , 443 S.E.2d 196, 201 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2137 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994) (citing the United States Supreme Court’s determination that the Frye rule, Frye v. United States, 54 App.D.C. 46 , 293 F. 1013 (1923), was inconsistent with Rule 702).
discussed
Cited "see"
San Francisco v. Wendy's International, Inc.
See Syl. pt. 4, Gentry, 195 W.Va. 512 , 466 S.E.2d 171 ("When scientific evidence is proffered, a circuit court in its `gatekeeper' role under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and Wilt v. Buracker, 191 W.Va. 39 , 443 S.E.2d 196 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2137 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994), must engage in a two-part analysis in regard to the expert testimony.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
(2×)
See United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 11 F.3d 1218, 1222 (5th Cir.) (“heightened scrutiny” of decision to grant challenge), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2138 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994); cf. United States v. Chandler, 996 F.2d 1073, 1102 (11th Cir.1993) (abuse-of-discretion standard for decision to deny challenge), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1227 , 114 S.Ct. 2724 , 129 L.Ed.2d 848 (1994).
examined
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord, United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 11 F.3d 1218, 1222 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2138 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandle
See United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 11 F.3d 1218, 1224-25 (5th Cir.) (rejecting sentencing challenge where either the amount attributed to appellant (13,600 kilograms) or the amount limited to the cocaine actually received by appellant (3,600 kilograms) would have resulted in the same offense level), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2138 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hodgson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
See Crosetto v. State Bar of Wisconsin, 12 F.3d 1396 , 1401 & n. 8 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1129 , 114 S.Ct. 2138 , 128 L.Ed.2d 867 (1994). ‘When ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), the court must accept as true all well-pleaded factual allegations and draw reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” Ezekiel v. Michel, 66 F.3d 894, 897 (7th Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davies
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 93-1701.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1994.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.