Cite instead
Cite for current doctrine:
O'Sullivan v. Boerckel (1999)
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Land Holdings LLC
merely possessing a medical degree is not sufficient to permit a physician to testify concerning any medical-related issue.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bush v. Michelin Tire Corp.
the issue with regard to expert testimony is not the qualifications of a witness in the abstract, but whether those qualifications provide a foundation for a witness to answer a specific question.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aspire Fed. Credit Union v. Robinson (In re Robinson)
See 7 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 727.02[1] (16th ed. rev. 2013) (citing *157 Barclays/Am.Business Credit (In re Adams) , 31 F.3d 389 (6th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 903 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995) (concluding that property of corporation controlled by debtor considered to be property of debtor for purposes of section 727(a)(2) ).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Delphi Corp. Securities, Derivative & \ERISA\" Litigation"
See Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1354 (6th Cir.1994) cert. denied 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995); In re Initial Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony M. Dixon v. Dave Dormire
See Dolny v. Erickson, 32 F.3d 381 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995), abrogated by O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838 , 119 S.Ct. 1728 , 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony M. Dixon v. Dave Dormire, Superintendent, George J. L. Barton v. James Gammon, Freddie C. Russell v. Mike Kemna Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General State of Missouri
See Dolny v. Erickson, 32 F.3d 381 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 (1995), abrogated by O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Elswick v. Nichols
See Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1350 (6th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Schaal v. James Gammon
See Larson v. Nutt, 34 F.3d 647, 648 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (finding that child witness's unavailability to testify was irrelevant for purposes of the Confrontation Clause), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 (1995); Ring v. Erickson, 983 F.2d 818, 819-21 (8th Cir. 1993) (finding admission of "available" child declarant's videotaped statements at trial violated defendant's confrontation rights).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Schaal, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. James A. Gammon, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Larson v. Nutt, 34 F.3d 647, 648 (8th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (finding that child witness’s unavailability to testify was irrelevant for purposes of the Confrontation Clause), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 901 , 130 L.Ed.2d 785 (1995); Ring v. Erickson, 983 F.2d 818, 819-21 (8th Cir. 1993) (finding admission of “available” child declarant’s videotaped statements at trial violated defendant’s confrontation rights).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berry v. Crown Equipment Corp.
See Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167, 1178 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999) (“The trial court ha[s] to decide whether this particular expert ha[s] sufficient specialized knowledge to assist the jurors in deciding the particular issues in the case”) See also, Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1351 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995) (A proper foundation for a technical expert demonstrates “first hand familiarity” with the subject of the testimony); Isely v. Capuchin Province, 877 F.Supp. 1055, 1063-4 (E.D.Mi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Feist v. Simonson
See Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1354 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995); Brooks v. Scheib, 813 F.2d 1191, 1193 (11th Cir.1987); Strauss v. City of Chicago, 760 F.2d 765 (7th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Verniero
See Marks v. Stinson, 19 F.3d 873 , 882-83 n. 6 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 901 , 130 L.Ed.2d 785 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Waters
See Cummings v. DeKalb County, 24 F.3d 1349, 1354 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 901 , 130 L.Ed.2d 785 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weinberger v. Navarro
“Intimate association” encompasses the “personal relationships that attend the creation and sustenance of a family.” Id. at 1563 ; see Cummings v. DeKalb County, 24 F.3d 1349, 1354 (11th Cir.1994) (setting forth criteria necessary to extend right of intimate association to other than familial relationships), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 901 , 130 L.Ed.2d 785 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson-Gibson v. Beasley
The factors “may be of limited utility in the context of non-scientific expert testimony.” First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Barreto, 268 F.3d 319, 334 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1158 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997)); see also id. (quoting Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1349 (6th Cir. 1994) , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 (1995)) (recognizing that “‘the distinction between scientific and non-scientific expert testimony is a critical one’ and that Daubert is ‘only of limited help’ in assessing technical or experiential ex…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas
Daubert’s factors “may be of limited utility in the context of non-scientific expert testimony.” First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Barreto, 268 F.3d 319, 334 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1158 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997)); see also id. (quoting Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1349 (6th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 (1995)) (recognizing that “‘the distinction between scientific and non-scientific expert testimony is a critical one’ and that Daubert is ‘only of limited help’ in assessing technical or experien…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dehne v. Avanino
Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791-92 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); see also Lind v. Grimmer, 30 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, Wang v. Lind, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hazlett v. Gorshe (In Re Gorshe)
Bowman v. Belt Valley Bank (In re Bowman), 173 B.R. 922, 925 (9th Cir. BAP 1994); see also Barclays/American Business Credit, Inc. v. Adams (In re Adams), 31 F.3d 389, 394 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 903 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995) (exceptions to discharge under § 727 require proof by a preponderance of the evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Sullivan v. Boerckel
(2×)
Compare e. g., Richardson v. Procunier, 762 F. 2d 429 (CA5 1985) (must file petition for discretionary review), with Dolny v. Erickson, 32 F. 3d 381 (CA8 1994) (petition for discretionary review not required), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 1111 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon Borough
See, e.g., Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1349 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. City of Montgomery
Thus, we conclude that our prior decisions, which generated pre-textually terminated employees section 1983 causes of action premised on substantive due process violations, are contrary to Supreme Court jurisprudence; to the extent they are contrary to the holding of this opinion, they áre overruled. 20 F.3d at 1560 ; see also Cummings v. De-Kalb County, 24 F.3d 1349, 1354 (11th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 901 , 130 L.Ed.2d 785 (1995) (holding that a substantive due process claim for pretextual deprivation of employment is precluded by McKinney).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Union of Baptists, Inc.
v.
Trustees of the Particular Primitive Baptist Church at Black Rock, Inc.
v.
Trustees of the Particular Primitive Baptist Church at Black Rock, Inc.
No. 94-895.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1995.
513 U.S. 1111
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Kentucky (1) · W.D. Oklahoma (1)
Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.