green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Shamaeizadeh v. Cunigan
See United States v. Wh ite, Nos. 91- the searches, instead reasoning that Shamaeizadeh failed to 2005, 91-209 0, 91-2168, 91-2169, 91-2308, 91-2403, 1994 WL 70855 , allege an injury for § 1983 purposes because the information at **10 (6th Cir. March 3, 1994) (“[I]t would be a stretch to say that gathered during the second and third searches was purged federal prosecuto rs are in p rivity with an exclusively state prosecution.”), from the affidavit supporting the subsequent search warrants. cert. denied, 513 U.S. 861 , 513 U.S. 949 (19 94); cf. Sunshine A nthra cite But Shamaeizadeh did a…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ali Shamaeizadeh v. Joel Cunigan
See United States v. White, Nos. 91-2005, 91-2090, 91-2168, 91-2169, 91-2308, 91-2403, 1994 WL 70855 , at *10 (6th Cir. March 3, 1994) ("[I]t would be a stretch to say that federal prosecutors are in privity with an exclusively state prosecution.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 861 , 115 S.Ct. 173 , 130 L.Ed.2d 109 , 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 362 , 130 L.Ed.2d 315 (1994); cf. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 402, 60 S.Ct. 907 , 84 L.Ed. 1263 (1940) ("There is privity between officers of the same government.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Joe Ivory Johnson v. United States
See Johnson v. United States, 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 361 , 130 L.Ed.2d 315 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez-Rodriguez
See Goodson, 165 F.3d at 614 ("'The need to force entry may result from danger to the safety of the entering officers or from the imminent destruction of evidence.'" (quoting United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 549 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 (1994))).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Atanacio Gonzalez-Rodriguez
See Goodson, 165 F.3d at 614 (“ ‘The need to force entry may result from danger to the safety of the entering officers or from the imminent destruction of evidence.’” (quoting United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 549 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 363 , 130 L.Ed.2d 316 (1994))).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Myung S. Koh
Thus, his claims fail because they all involved money that was “necessary for the scheme to continue.” Id. at 805 (explaining why “loss in fraud cases includes the amount of property taken, even if all or part has been returned”); accord United States v. Mucciante, 21 F.3d 1228, 1238 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 361 , 130 L.Ed.2d 315 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Arellano Ramirez
See id., United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 555 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 363 , 130 L.Ed.2d 316 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terrence E. Goodson
See id. (forced entries reasonable where officers waited 6 - 8 seconds and 5 - 10 seconds).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold J. Jones
See United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541 , 552 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold J. Jones, United States of America v. James O. Cashaw, United States of America v. John L. Palmer
(2×)
See United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 552 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 363 , 130 L.Ed.2d 316 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marc A. Snoddy
See United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 556 (8th Cir.) (the determination of a defendant’s role in an offense is based on all relevant conduct, not solely on the act of conviction), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 363 , 130 L.Ed.2d 316 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marc A. Snoddy
See United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 556 (8th Cir.) (the determination of a defendant’s role in an offense is based on all relevant conduct, not solely on the act of conviction), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sconsa
See Wilson, 514 U.S. at 929 ; Young, 609 F.3d at 353 ; United States v. Gatewood, 60 F.3d 248, 250 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1001 (1995); see also United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 549 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Eason
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 550-51 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 (1994) (criminal record which contained a nine-year-old misdemeanor drug possession conviction and a thirteen-year-old charge for carrying concealed weapons insufficient particularized evidence to justify no-knock entry).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mazepink v. State
See also United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 949 (1994) (holding that a wait of three to five seconds before forcing entry was insufficient absent evidence that the officers were in danger or that evidence was being destroyed); Mendonsa, 989 F.2d 366 (holding that, absent exigent circumstances, a forced entry after only three to five seconds of silence following the officers’ announcement was not reasonable and required suppression of the evidence); United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 (1990) (holding that instances …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. Lucht, 18 F.3d 541, 550-51 (8th Cir.) (waiting three to five seconds before entering was not long enough to find constructive refusal to admit), cert. denied, [ 513 U.S. 949 , 115 S.Ct. 363 , 130 L.Ed.2d 316 ] (1994); United States v. Marts, 986 F.2d 1216, 1218 (8th Cir.1993) (less than five seconds was not sufficient to find constructive refusal to admit); and United States v. Rodriguez, 663 F.Supp. 585, 587-88 (D.D.C.1987) (three to five second delay was insufficient to find constructive refusal to admit) with [U.S. v.] Smith, 63 F.3d [956,] 962 [10th Cir. (1995)] (f…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mandilakis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-5398.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1994.
513 U.S. 949
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.