green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Kathryn O. Reinhold v. Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia School for the Deaf and Blind
(2×)
See Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh, 120 F.3d 1286, 1297 (3d Cir. 1997) (holding that threats of reprisal for the rejection of a supervisor’s sexual advances constitute quid pro quo sexual harassment, even if the supervisor does not follow through on the threats, because"a quid pro quo violation occurs at the time when an employee is told that his or her compensation, etc. is dependent upon sub mission to unwelcome sexual advances”); Jansen v. Packaging Corp: of Am.., 123 F.3d 490 , 495 (7th Cir.1997) ("liability for quid pro quo harassment is strict even if the supervisor’s threat does n…
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Levinson v. Kelly McCullough
See Levinson v. F.C.C., 1995 WL 224851 (D.C.Cir.1995), cert denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 570 , 133 L.Ed.2d 494 (1995); Levinson v. F.C.C., 976 F.2d 46 (Table) (D.C.Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Woodruff v. Wilson
See Mendenhall v. Goldsmith, 59 F.3d 685, 691 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 568 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
MacIntosh v. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n International
See Gary v. Long, 59 F.3d 1391, 1399 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 569 , 133 L.Ed.2d 493 (1995) (holding that, “while a supervisory employee may be joined as a party defendant in a Title VII action, that employee must be viewed as being sued in his capacity as the agent of the employer, who is alone liable for a violation of Title VII.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mukaida v. Hawaii
Accord Gary v. Long, 59 F.3d 1391, 1399 (D.C.Cir.1995) (“[W]hile a supervisory employee may be joined as a party defendant in a Title VII action, that employee must be viewed as being sued in his capacity as the agent of the employer, who is alone liable for a violation of Title VII”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 569 , 133 L.Ed.2d 493 (1995); EEOC v. AIC Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hilands v. Department of Revenue, 4512 (or.tax 5-2-2001)
See Ragsdale v. Dept. of Rev ., 321 Or. 216 , 895 P.2d 1348 (1995), cert den sub nom Bank of California, N.A. v. Oregon Dept. of Rev ., 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 569 , 133 L.Ed.2d 493 (1995); see also Stovall v. State of Oregon , 324 Or. 92 , 922 P.2d 646 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyss v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Gary v. Long, 59 F.3d 1391, 1399 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 569 , 133 L.Ed.2d 493 (1995); Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1313-17 (2d Cir.1995); Di ci v. Pennsylvania, 91 F.3d 542, 551-53 (3d Cir.1996); Sheridan v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Perry Center, Inc. v. Heitkamp
See Mendenhall v. Goldsmith, 59 F.3d 685, 691 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 568 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 (1995); Schrob v. Catterson, 948 F.2d 1402, 1409 (3rd Cir.1991); Cole v. Sharp, 898 F.Supp. 799, 803 (D.Kan.1995); Juide v. City of Ann Arbor, 839 F.Supp. 497, 501 (E.D.Mich.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norton v. Town of Brookhaven
Thus, when a high executive officer of a municipality authorizes a civil lawsuit in pursuit of that municipality’s governmental interests, absolute immunity attaches.” Id. at 66; see also Mendenhall v. Goldsmith, 59 F.3d 685, 691 (7th Cir.1995) (holding that the prosecutor’s conduct in filing for an injunction in civil forfeiture case was entitled to absolute immunity because the prosecutor “acted pursuant to the authority vested in him under [state] law, functioning purely in his capacity as an advocate for the state.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 568 , 133 L.Ed.2d 492 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeSario v. Thomas
See, e.g., Hem v. Beye, 57 F.3d 906 , 911 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 569 , 133 L.Ed.2d 494 (1995); Dexter v. Kirsckner, 984 F.2d 979 , 983 (9th Cir.1993) (as amended on denial of rehearing and rehearing en banc); Weaver, 886 F.2d at 198 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Desario v. Thomas
See, e.g., Hern v. Beye, 57 F.3d 906, 911 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1011 , 116 S.Ct. 569 , 133 L.Ed.2d 494 (1995); Dexter v. Kirschner, 984 F.2d 979, 983 (9th Cir.1993) (as amended on denial of rehearing and rehearing en banc); Weaver, 886 F.2d at 198 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bank of California, N. A., Trustee of the Julia D. Ragsdale Trust
v.
Oregon Department of Revenue
v.
Oregon Department of Revenue
No. 95-592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.