green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.3 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 ·
…complaints need not plead legal theories.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, FL
(2×)
complaints need not plead legal theories.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
75 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 758, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 686 Shari L. Lyes v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida, Cinthia Becton, Marge Confrey, Bruce Guyton, Bertha Orange, Barbara Rodriguez, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Riviera Beach City Council, City of Riviera Beach, Florida, Neil Crilly, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
(2×)
complaints need not plead legal theories.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rooney v. Town of Groton
See Aaron v. City of Wichita, Kan., 54 F.3d 652, 658 (10th Cir.) (“Since overtime is not inherently inconsistent with one’s status as a salaried employee, the fact that the firefighters’ paystubs indicated the number of hours covered is also not inconsistent with salaried status.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 965 , 116 S.Ct. 419 , 133 L.Ed.2d 336 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Knuckles v. Brigano
See Knuckles (Knuckles III) v. Ohio, 516 U.S. 965 , 116 S.Ct. 421 , 133 L.Ed.2d 338 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barth v. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.
See Aaron v. City of Wichita, Kan., 54 F.3d 652 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 965 , 116 S.Ct. 419 , 133 L.Ed.2d 336 (1995)(finding genuine issue of fact regarding executive exemption for fire chiefs and captains where City’s contention that they spend in excess of 80% of their work hours managing their respective subdivisions was contradicted by firefighters’ contention that the Chiefs had little or no discretion or independent judgment; no authority to hire, fire, promote, demote, suspend personnel, authorize shift trades, authorize transfers, give pay raises, or reduce pay; no auth…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Juluke
Arguing that possibility to the jury, however, risked eroding a common defense designed to "give strength against a common attack." Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 92 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 475 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting); see Eaglin v. Welborn, 57 F.3d 496, 501 (7th Cir.) ("The making of inconsistent defenses is likely to confuse the jury and to bring public opprobrium on the criminal justice system for tolerating such monkeyshines."), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 965 , 116 S.Ct. 421 , 133 L.Ed.2d 338 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kun v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
See Luckett v. Rent-A-Center, Inc., 53 F.3d 871, 873 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 420 , 133 L.Ed.2d 337 (1995) (affirming district judge's dismissal of Title VII claim as time-barred where (a) the judge initially had dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice because the complaint had failed to state a violation of federal anti-discrimination law and (b) the amended complaint had been filed more than 90 days after the plaintiff had received his right-to-sue letter).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Obenauf v. Frontier Financial Group, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Koopman v. Water District No. 1, 41 F.3d 1417, 1420 (10th Cir.1994) (“It is clear that under *1210 Farrar v. Hobby, [the plaintiff] is a prevailing party because he was awarded nominal damages.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 965 , 116 S.Ct. 420 , 133 L.Ed.2d 337 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cash v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
This directive controls regardless of whether the employee receives her compensation “on a piece-rate, salary, commission, or other basis.” 9 Id.; see,, e.g., id. § 778.113(b) (a monthly salary is translated into a weekly salary by multiplying the monthly salary by twelve) (i.e., the number of months in a year) and dividing the result by fifty-two (i.e., the number of weeks in a year); see also Aaron v. City of Wichita, Kan., 54 F.3d 652, 655 (10th Cir.1995) (“The regular rate is the rate per hour, but employers are not required to compensate employees on an hourly basis.”), cert. den…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. State
There is no reason for us to deny White the same relief. [7] We have consistently characterized mental mitigation as one of the "weightiest mitigating factors." Santos v. State, 629 So.2d 838, 840 (Fla. 1994); see also Hildwin v. Dugger, 654 So.2d 107 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 420 , ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Luckett
v.
Rent-A-Center, Inc.
v.
Rent-A-Center, Inc.
No. 95-5450.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (4)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.