green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…roof of intent is almost inevitably circumstantial and inferential; few defendants admit a specific intent to inflict .
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anselmo v. Target Corp.
roof of intent is almost inevitably circumstantial and inferential; few defendants admit a specific intent to inflict .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anselmo v. Target Corp.
roof of intent is almost inevitably circumstantial and inferential; few defendants admit a specific intent to inflict .
cited
Cited "see"
Leebaert v. Harrington
See Immediato v. Rye Neck School Dist., 73 F.3d 454 , 460-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 813 , 117 S.Ct. 60 , 136 L.Ed.2d 22 (1996). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Leebaert v. Harrington
See Immediato v. Rye Neck School Dist., 73 F.3d 454 , 460-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 813 , 117 S.Ct. 60 , 136 L.Ed.2d 22 (1996). 3 The Troxel Court appears to be the first to use the phrase "care, custody, and control," rather than the very similar "care, custody, and management," Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972), in the context of a parent's right concerning his or her children.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mauri
v.
City of Portland
v.
City of Portland
No. 95-1854.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (2)
Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.