green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Ricardo Sanders v. Vince Cullen
See Sanders v. California, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald Dwayne Whatley v. State of Alabama.
See Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4, 36 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996).” Whitehead v. State, 777 So.2d 781, 848 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), affirmed, 777 So.2d 854 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, Whitehead v. Alabama, 532 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 1233 , 149 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Boyd v. Commissioner of Correction
See Boyd v. Armstrong, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S. Ct. 114 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gavin v. State
See Rule 45A, Ala.R.App.P. "`Section 15-10-3[(a)](3), Ala.Code 1975, provides that an officer may arrest an individual without a warrant when a felony has been committed and he has reasonable cause to believe that the individual arrested committed the felony.' Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4, 13 (Ala.Crim.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996). `[R]easonable cause has been equated with probable cause.' Daniels v. State, 534 So.2d 628, 651 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), aff'd, 534 So.2d 656 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1040 , 107…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cardenas v. State
See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 181 , 110 S.Ct. 2793 , 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) “The trial court’s reasoning is irrelevant, however, so long as any theory articulated by the State supports the legality of the search.” Brimage v. State, 918 S.W.2d 466, 479 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996). 2 We must therefore consider the trial court’s denial of Cardenas’ motion to suppress in light of the other theory articulated by the State in the trial court: the officers’ entry into Cardenas’ apartment was lawful under the doctrine…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Molina-Valenzuela
See United States v. Cordovar-Perez, 65 F.3d 1552, 1554 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 113 , 136 L.Ed.2d 65 (1996); accord Thomas v. I.N.S., 35 F.3d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1994) (“compliance by the government with promises made during plea bargaining and analogous contexts generally requires that the agent be authorized to make the promise”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morant v. State
First, “[u]nder the effective defense theory, as developed by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the trial court has the authority to grant immunity to a defense witness ‘when it is found that a potential defense witness can offer testimony which is clearly exculpatory and essential to the defense case and when the government has no strong interest in withholding . . . immunity . . . .’ Government of the Virgin Islands v. Smith, 615 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1980); see generally People v. Lucas, 12 Cal. 4th 415, 460 , 907 P.2d 373 , 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 525 (1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 ,…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holmes
Under the effective defense theory, as developed by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the trial court has the authority to grant immunity to a defense witness “when it is found that a potential defense witness can offer testimony which is clearly exculpatory and essential to the defense case and when the government has no strong interest in withholding . . . immunity . . . .” Government of the Virgin Islands v. Smith, 615 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1980); see generally People v. Lucas, 12 Cal. 4th 415, 460 , 907 P.2d 373 , 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 525 (1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S. Ct. …
cited
Cited "see"
Whitehead v. State
See Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4, 36 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. James
Accord, Boyd v. Meachum, 77 F.3d 60, 64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S. Ct. 114 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shanklin v. State
See also Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996).’ “Ingram v. State, 779 So.2d 1225, 1262-63 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), affirmed, Ex parte Ingram, 779 So.2d 1283 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, Ingram v. Alabama, 531 U.S. 1193 , 121 S.Ct. 1194 , 149 L.Ed.2d 109 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny Sanchez v. State
See also Brimage v. State , 918 S.W.2d 466, 507 (Tex.Crim.App.) (op. on reh'g en banc ), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996). [14] Moreover, when a defendant voluntarily abandons property, he lacks standing to contest the reasonableness of the search of the abandoned property.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny Sanchez v. State
See also Brimage v. State, 918 S.W.2d 466, 507 (Tex.Crim.App.) (op. on reh'g en banc), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996). 14 Moreover, when a defendant voluntarily abandons property, he lacks standing to contest the reasonableness of the search of the abandoned property.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny Sanchez v. State
See also Brimage v. State, 918 S.W.2d 466, 507 (Tex.Crim.App.) (op. on reh'g en banc), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996).[14] Moreover, when a defendant voluntarily abandons property, he lacks standing to contest the reasonableness of the search of the abandoned property.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
See also Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996).” Ingram v. State, 779 So.2d 1225, 1262-63 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), affirmed, Ex parte Ingram, 779 So.2d 1283 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, Ingram v. Alabama, 531 U.S. 1193 , 121 S.Ct. 1194 , 149 L.Ed.2d 109 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in Re: Preston Jerome White, Relator
See also Brimage v. State , 918 S.W.2d 466, 507 (Tex.Crim.App.) (op. on reh'g en banc ), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996). [14] Moreover, when a defendant voluntarily abandons property, he lacks standing to contest the reasonableness of the search of the abandoned property.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Harris
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Sanders, 11 Cal.4th 475 , 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 751 , 905 P.2d 420, 458-59 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996); Burns v. State, 699 So.2d 646, 654 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1121 , 118 S.Ct. 1063 , 140 L.Ed.2d 123 (1998); State v. Loftin, 146 N.J. 295 , 680 A.2d 677, 712-13 (1996); State v. Stenson, 132 Wash.2d 668 , 940 P.2d 1239, 1278-1282 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 1193 , 140 L.Ed.2d 323 (1998). 16 Appellant next argues that the trial court erred in refusing to direct the jury to find as a mitigating circumsta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franks v. State
Mason v. State, 905 S.W.2d 570, 575 (Tex.Crim.App.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1051 , 116 S.Ct. 717 , 133 L.Ed.2d 670 (1996); see also Brimage v. State, 918 S.W.2d 466, 475-76 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cer t. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 66 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Perkins v. State
See also Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. State
Embrey v. State, 283 Ala. 110, 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). “ ‘This hue of argument is “within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses.” Varner v. State, 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App.1982); Cook v. State, 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App.1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala.1978)....’” Kuenzel v. State, 577 So.2d 474, 503 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), aff…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. State
Embrey v. State, 283 Ala. 110, 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). "`This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State, 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App.1982); Cook v. State, 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App.1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978)....'" Kuenzel v. State, 577 So.2d 474, 503 (Ala. Cr.App.1990), aff'd, 577 So…
Stewart
v.
Gramley, Warden
v.
Gramley, Warden
No. 95-9100.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.