green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
“sykes ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Time Warner Entertainment/Advance-Newhouse Partnership v. Worldwide Electronics, L.C.
sykes ii
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Olympia v. Drebick
Id. at 786-90, 83 P.3d 443 ; see Campbell & Gwinn, 146 Wash.2d at 11-12 , 43 P.3d 4 (noting that recourse to legislative history is appropriate only where intended meaning is indiscernible from plain language of provision and related provisions and statutes). [4] For example, the dissent relies on Ehrlich v. City of Culver City, 12 Cal.4th 854 , 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 242 , 911 P.2d 429, 444 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 929 , 117 S.Ct. 299 , 136 L.Ed.2d 218 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
DirecTV, Inc. v. Montes
See International Cablevi *355 sion, Inc. v. Sykes, 75 F.3d 123, 133 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 929 , 117 S.Ct. 298 , 136 L.Ed.2d 217 (1996) (holding that an individual’s use of a pirate cable television descrambling device to intercept without authorization programming services transmitted via satellite constituted a violation of § 605(a)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. Partnership
Ehrlich, 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 242 , 911 P.2d at 432 (plurality op. by Arabian, J., joined by Lucas, C.J., and George, J.); id., 50 Cal. Rptr.2d 242 , 911 P.2d at 451 (Mosk, J., concurring) (Dolan "is generally not applicable to development fees; the present case is thus more the exception than the rule”); id., 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 242 , 911 P.2d at 462 (Kennard, J., concurring and dissenting, joined by Baxter, J., in concurring), ("I agree with the majority that Nollan-Dolan’s ‘essential nexus' and 'rough proportionality’ requirements apply to monetary exactions that, like the mitigation fee invol…
cited
Cited "see"
City of Annapolis v. Waterman
See Ehrlich v. City of Culver City, 12 Cal.4th 854 , 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 242 , 911 P.2d 429 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 929 , 117 S.Ct. 299 , 136 L.Ed.2d 218 (1996). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Time Warner Cable of New York City v. Googies Luncheonette, Inc.
See International Cablevision, Inc. v. Sykes, 75 F.3d 123 , 131 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 929 , 117 S.Ct. 298 , 136 L.Ed.2d 217 (1996); Time Warner Cable of New York City v. Pena, No. 97 Civ. 3538(RO)(HBP), slip op. at 10 n.3 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Entertainment by J & J, Inc. v. Al-Waha Enterprises, Inc.
See, e.g., International Cablevision, Inc. v. Sykes, 75 F.3d 123, 131-33 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 929 , 117 S.Ct. 298 , 136 L.Ed.2d 217 (1996) (holding that claims of unauthorized broadcasts of cable television transmissions may be brought under both 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605); Entertainment by J&J, Inc. v. Nina’s Rest. & Catering, No. 01 CIV. 5483KMW-RLE, 2002 WL 1000286 , at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Mandarino
LEXIS 1087 (E.D.N.Y 1989); see also International Cablevision v. Sykes, 75 F.3d 123 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, Noel v. International Cablevision, 519 U.S. 929 , 117 S.Ct. 298 , 136 L.Ed.2d 217 (1996). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Can Do, Inc., Pension and Profit Sharing Plan and Successor Plans, Individually and as Trustee for Holder
v.
Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & Smith
v.
Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & Smith
No. 96-210.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Florida (1)
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.