green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Lopez v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 91 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Brian Devereaux v. State
See id. (expressly overruling Montoya and holding that a defendant’s failure to pursue to an adverse ruling his 4 objection to a jury argument forfeits his right to complain about the argument on appeal); Robertson v. State, 245 S.W.3d 545, 547 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2007, pet. ref’d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mario Araiza v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 (1997); Moreno v. State, 195 S.W.3d 321, 329 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 th Dist.] 2006, pet. ref’d) (both holding failure to object to jury argument forfeits right to complain on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mario Araiza v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 (1997); Moreno v. State, 195 S.W.3d 321, 329 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, pet. ref’d) (both holding failure to object to jury argument forfeits right to complain on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mario Araiza v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 (1997); Moreno v. State, 195 S.W.3d 321, 329 (Tex.App.–Houston [14 th Dist.] 2006, pet. ref’d) (both holding failure to object to jury argument forfeits right to complain on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanders v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 90 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997) (conducting a harm analysis after determining that the trial court did not commit error).
cited
Cited "see"
in the Matter of T.G., Jr.
Mathis v. State , 67 S.W.3d 918 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002) ; see Cockrell v. State , 933 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1173 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Billy John Skipper v. State
Mathis v. State , 67 S.W.3d 918 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002) ; see Cockrell v. State , 933 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1173 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Billy John Skipper v. State
Mathis v. State, 67 S.W.3d 918 5 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002); see Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Billy John Skipper v. State
Mathis v. State , 67 S.W.3d 918 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002) ; see Cockrell v. State , 933 S.W.2d 73 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1173 (1996).
examined
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Rosenthal v. Poe
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Romo v. State, 631 S.W.2d 504, 506 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), overruled on other grounds, Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997) (juror testified that officer’s unauthorized communication did not affect her ability to decide the case). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
(2×)
See Nonn v. State, 41 S.W.3d 677, 679 (Tex.Crim.App.2001) and Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 90-1 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997) (requiring substantial compliance with Article 38.22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).
cited
Cited "see"
Graham v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. State
See Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997) (explicitly overruling Romo).
cited
Cited "see"
Donaldson v. State
See Lawrence v. State, 698 So.2d 1219, 1222 (Fla.1997); see generally Ferrell v. State, 686 So.2d 1324, 1330 (Fla. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1443 , 137 L.Ed.2d 549 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thornton v. State
Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 859 , 121 S.Ct. 145 , 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000); Wolcott v. State, 774 So.2d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); (c) improperly vouching for the credibility of a key prosecution witness by stating that "Reverend Davis thought very carefully as a man of God." See Lewis v. State, 711 So.2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review denied, 725 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1998); Brown v. State, 787 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also Ferrell v. State, 686 So.2d 1324, 1328 (Fla. 1996)(judges and attorneys must refrain from discussing religious philosophy or engaging…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nonn v. State
See, e.g., Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 90-1 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1173 , 117 S.Ct. 1442 , 137 L.Ed.2d 548 (1997); Sosa v. State, 769 S.W.2d 909, 915-6 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); Bennett v. State, 766 S.W.2d 227, 230-1 (Tex.Crim.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McReynolds
v.
Gangel-Jacob, Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department
v.
Gangel-Jacob, Justice, Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department
No. 96-7790.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 14, 1997.
520 U.S. 1173
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.