green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“a committee report, representing a collective statement by the drafters about the intended purpose of proposed legislation, is considered a particularly good indicator of congressional intent when it is otherwise difficult to ascertain.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wlny-Tv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
a committee report, representing a collective statement by the drafters about the intended purpose of proposed legislation, is considered a particularly good indicator of congressional intent when it is otherwise difficult to ascertain.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Montana Department of Transportation v. Tracy King
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1176 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that the Crow Allotment Act of 1920 did not create a consensual relationship between a tribe and a state), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 (1997); see also County of Lewis v. Allen, 163 F.3d 509, 515 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (stating that Montana's first exception was not meant to apply to "agreements between two governmental entities").
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Montana Department of Transportation v. King
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that the Crow Allotment Act of 1920 did not create a consensual relationship between a tribe and a state), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also County of Lewis v. Allen, 163 F.3d 509, 515 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc) (stating that Montana’s first exception was not meant to apply to “agreements between two governmental entities”).
discussed
Cited "see"
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2432, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3174 State of Washington v. William M. Daley, United States Secretary of Commerce, Midwater Trawlers Co-Operative West Coast Seafood Processors Fisherman's Marketing Assoc. v. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, William M. Daley, United States Secretary of Commerce
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir.1996) (declining to advance to Rule 19(b) analysis upon concluding that absent Tribe is not a necessary party under Rule 19(a)), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also Southwest Center, 150 F.3d at 1155 (reversing district court's determination that absent party was "necessary" and remanding without Rule 19(b) analysis).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington v. Daley
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir.1996) (declining to advance to Rule 19(b) analysis upon concluding that absent Tribe is not a necessary party under Rule 19(a)), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); see also Southwest Center, 150 F.3d at 1155 (reversing district court’s determination that absent party was “necessary” and remanding without Rule 19(b) analysis).
cited
Cited "see"
Landmark Golf Ltd. Partnership v. Las Vegas Paiute Tribe
See Yellowstone County v. Pease, 96 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1691 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
California Democratic Party v. Jones
See O’Callaghan v. Alaska, 914 P.2d 1250 (Alaska 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1690 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Heavey v. Chapman, 93 Wash.2d 700 , 611 P.2d 1256 (1980); Anderson v. Millikin, 186 Wash. 602 , 59 P.2d 295 (1936).
discussed
Cited "see"
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1627, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2175 California Democratic Party Art Torres Kathy Bowler Paul Jorjorian Peace and Freedom Party C.T. Weber Libertarian Party of California Gail Lightfoot, and California Republican Party, Michael Schroeder Shawn Steel Donna Shalansky, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California v. Californians for an Open Primary, Defendant-Intervenor- California Democratic Party Art Torres Kathy Bowler Paul Jorjorian Peace and Freedom Party C.T. Weber Libertarian Party of California Gail Lightfoot, and California Republican Party, Michael Schroeder Shawn Steel Donna Shalansky, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Bill Jones, Secretary of the State of California
See O'Callaghan v. Alaska, 914 P.2d 1250 (Alaska 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209 , 117 S.Ct. 1690 , 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997); Heavey v. Chapman, 93 Wash.2d 700 , 611 P.2d 1256 (1980); Anderson v. Millikin, 186 Wash. 602 , 59 P.2d 295 (1936).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Koger
No. 96-8012.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 12, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
Petition for writ of mandamus denied.