green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Gilbrook v. City of Westminster
But see Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 878-79 (9th Cir.1996) (reviewing for plain error when the appellant failed to file a motion for directed verdict in the trial court and reversing the judgment when there was no evidence to support the jury’s verdict), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca9 1999
But see Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 878-79 (9th Cir.1996) (reviewing for plain error when the appellant failed to file a motion for directed verdict in the trial court and reversing the judgment when there was no evidence to support the jury's verdict), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). 13 Defendants argue that Garrison's statement was recklessly false and, for that reason, should not be deemed to address a matter of public concern.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Shiloh v. County of Kern
Where a particular 7 amendment provides an explicit textual source of constitutional protection against a particular sort of 8 government behavior, that Amendment, not the more generalized notion of substantive due process, 9 must be the guide for analyzing a plaintiff’s claims." Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 874 (9th Cir. 10 1996) (citations, internal quotations, and brackets omitted), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 11 (1997); County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 842 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salsberg v. Trico Marine Services, Inc. (In Re Trico Marine Services, Inc.)
In short, neither perjury nor nondisclosure, by itself, amounts to anything more than fraud involving injury to a single litigant. *60 860 F.2d at 559-60 (emphasis added); accord Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, 24 F.3d 457, 460 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1843 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1997); New Card, Inc. v. Glenns, No. 00 Civ. 4756(RMB), 2004 WL 540417 , at *3 n. 4 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Ventura Mobilehome Communities Owners Association, an Unincorporated Association v. City of San Buenaventura
See Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 875 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prickett v. Amoco Oil Co.
See Lusk, 238 F.3d at 1241 , citing Thompson v. Holy Family Hosp., 121 F.3d 537, 540 (9th Cir.1997) (finding twenty-five-pound lifting restriction not substantially limiting on its face) and Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys, Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , 349 (4th Cir.1996) (holding, as a matter of law, that a twenty-five pound lifting limitation does not substantially limit the performance of any major life activity), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); accord Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (same); Hacker v. City…
cited
Cited "see"
Ihekwu v. City of Durham, NC
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , 348 (4th Cir.1996) (per curiam), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bissell v. Reno
Because she has not established a prima facie case, “it is unnecessary to address the question of reasonable accommodation.” Id.; see Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Systems, Inc. 101 F.3d 346 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied sub nom Williams v. Avnet, Inc., 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nowlin v. K Mart Corp.
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , (4th Cir.1996) (25-pound restriction), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoskins v. Oakland County Sheriff's Department
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346, 349 (4th Cir.1996) (declaring, as a matter of law, that a 25-pound lifting limitation "does not constitute a significant restriction on one’s ability to lift, work, or perform any other major life activity”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). see also Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (holding that a 25-pound lifting restriction did not substan *890 tially limit any major life activities); Ray v. Glidden Co., 85 F.3d 227, 229 (5th Cir.1996) (c…
Hutton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Hutton
v.
Three Rivers Area Hospital
v.
Three Rivers Area Hospital
No. 96-1426.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1997.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.